Putin Won’t Accept
Fox News wrote on March 14:
“Zelenskyy is correct – peace in Ukraine is a long way off. Putin is highly unlikely to accept President Trump’s current peace plan…
“Trump demands that his staff accomplish things at record speeds, or ‘in Trump time’… But with all due respect to President Trump and his accomplishments, the Russia-Ukraine situation is extremely complex. Russia has a very different strategic culture from Western culture. And Putin is an entirely different kind of animal from anyone Trump has dealt with before… [Putin] wants to end the war but only on his terms, which, if accepted by the U.S., would humiliate Washington.
“On March 6th, Putin publicly ruled out making any concessions on Ukraine… Putin believes he can call the shots. Unconscionable Russian (and Ukrainian) losses notwithstanding, Russia is capable of dragging this war out for years. Indeed, Putin has been developing his strategy ever since he became president, a quarter of a century ago… This is why the Russians largely dismissed Trump’s threat of ‘large-scale’ sanctions. ‘To speak with Russia from the position of strength and to threaten with sanctions is a road to nowhere,’ said State Duma Representative from the Crimea Region Yuri Nesterenko. Additional sanctions are highly unlikely to change Putin’s decision calculus…
“Putin has indicated multiple times that a temporary break in fighting was out of the question as he doesn’t want to give a strategic pause to Ukraine, Europe or the U.S., to rearm… Russia, being on a wartime footing, now produces more weapons in three months than the entire NATO alliance in one year… Putin also increased Russia’s armed forces above the constitutionally allowable size, to ensure that Russia can fight till the last Ukrainian…
“Putin ruled out negotiating with Zelenskyy, having told state Rossiya 1 TV that ‘he [Zelenskyy] has no right to sign anything,’ having called the Ukrainian leader ‘illegitimate.’ Indeed, Zelenskyy’s presidential term expired in May. The Ukrainian parliament, at the end of February, rebuffed U.S. calls for elections by passing a resolution that ruled out elections during wartime, citing martial law, in compliance with the Ukrainian constitution…”
Unstable From the Start
The Mirror wrote on March 13:
“Vladimir Putin has said Ukrainian troops involved in a counter-offensive will have to ‘surrender or die’ before he agrees to a ceasefire… Putin also recalled his visit to Kursk yesterday, where Russian troops are attempting to repel a Ukrainian counteroffensive in their own territory. He said ‘the situation is fully under our control, and the group that invaded our territory has been fully isolated’. The Russian leader added that Ukrainian troops can no longer leave the area, and they will have to ‘surrender or die’. He identified the fighting in the region as one of the issues preventing a deal being reached…
“One defence and security analyst told the Mirror that he does not believe the US be able to persuade Russia to change its position – and that the West should prepare for war with Russia… Michael Clarke said: ‘… The Kremlin also has an agenda to weaken Europe in all ways possible and thinks it is on a roll now so there will be a sense of military momentum behind what Russia plans next.’ He said any ceasefire that is reached would be an ‘unstable truce from the start’…”
“Putin Is Playing Trump (Again)”
Politico wrote on March 14:
“U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the ball was in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s court. But it was an easier ball for the Russian leader to play than many thought… It was classic Putin… There was no firm Russian nyet to stoke the U.S. leader’s anger, rather a teacher’s applause for Trump’s idea and effort. The temporary truce was ‘correct’ and ‘we support it,’ the Russian leader said, but, alas, there were many sticking points…
“It was all drawn from the playbook that he and his lugubrious Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov have used time and again: Obfuscate, delay, muddle, throw in some whataboutism, be sorrowfully unctuous, but make sure to dangle a carrot… so far, the play seems to be going as planned. For Trump, Putin’s response was ‘very promising.’… The carrot is working, and he can slow Trump’s eagerness for a deal…
“Trump’s options for forcing Putin into doing anything aren’t great. Earlier this week, he threatened to apply economic pressure on Russia if Putin didn’t agree to a ceasefire… But Russia’s already been sanctioned every which way since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago…”
Trump Repeats Putin’s Lie
Bild Online wrote on March 14:
“Ukrainians are threatened with a massacre in Kursk, Putin claims – and Trump is portraying himself online as their savior. But the whole story is nonsense… Putin claimed in Moscow: ‘A 30-day ceasefire is beneficial for Ukraine, as all its military personnel are blocked in the Kursk region.’ Putin added, verbatim: ‘It is becoming increasingly impossible for the Ukrainian military to escape the encirclement.’
“Complete nonsense! Except for small groups of Ukrainian soldiers (about 25 men in total), thousands of Ukrainians have managed to withdraw from Kursk toward the Ukrainian region of Sumy… Even the maps of Russian war bloggers clearly show that there are NO ‘encircled,’ ‘surrounded,’ ‘encircled,’ or ‘blockaded’ Ukrainian units in Kursk…
“Hard to believe: The day after the baseless claim, US President Donald Trump repeated Putin’s propaganda. ‘Thousands of Ukrainian troops are completely surrounded by the Russian military,’ Trump said on the network ‘Truth Social.’ He asked Putin to ‘spare their lives’ to prevent a ‘horrific massacre.’ ‘This would be a horrific massacre, the likes of which hasn’t been seen since World War II,’ Trump wrote – completely beside the point.”
Putin, a mass murderer, liar and former KGB agent and spy, knows how to play his cards to his advantage.
Trump-Putin Phone Call
Deutsche Welle wrote on March 18 and March 19:
“Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump agreed in a phone call that Russia and Ukraine stop attacking each other’s energy infrastructure for 30 days… ‘It was emphasized that the key condition for preventing the escalation of the conflict and working towards its resolution by political and diplomatic means should be a complete cessation of foreign military assistance and the provision of intelligence information to Kyiv,’ the Kremlin said…
“‘We’ve seen that attacks on civilian infrastructure have not eased at all in the first night after this supposedly ground-breaking, great phone call’ between Putin and US President Donald Trump, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said in a TV interview, adding that ‘Putin is playing a game.’ The German minister also described as ‘unacceptable’ the Kremlin’s insistence that a ‘key condition’ for peace would be a complete halt to Western military and intelligence support for Ukraine’s embattled military….
“Germany is set to deliver additional military supplies to Ukraine this year… The package includes €3 billion ($3.3 billion) in aid for 2025 and a further €8.3 billion for the years 2026 to 2029. A spokesman for Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the equipment would consist of Iris-T air defense systems, guided missiles, surveillance radars, drones, combat vehicles and light weapons.”
The Sun wrote on March 18 and 19:
“Putin’s red lines remain intact and he has not shifted from his original goals of a Nato rollback in Eastern Europe or a demilitarised Ukraine… The Russian said… that he would not agree to a full ceasefire until all military aid to Ukraine from the US and its allies stopped…
“German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron have vowed to keep arming Ukraine, directly pushing back against Vladimir Putin’s demand for a ‘complete cessation’ of Western military support…
“IT is a sign of how badly Donald Trump has been played that Putin’s only concession to Kyiv was not to murder prisoners of war. [Putin] rejected calls for full 30-day ceasefire. He rejected calls to end all air strikes and attacks in the Black Sea…”
The New York Post Editorial Board wrote on March 19:
“Putin’s publicly ruling out a ceasefire unless he first gets a total halt on all foreign military aid and intelligence-sharing to Ukraine…
“46% of Americans think Washington isn’t doing enough to help Ukraine, the highest level of support Ukraine’s enjoyed here since the war began — up 16 points since December and 21 since October. Meanwhile, the share who think we’re doing too much has plunged from 37% in December to 30%. And a majority, 53%, actually want to help Ukraine reclaim territory it’s lost to Russia, even if it prolongs the conflict — vs. 45% who want to end it quickly and let Russia keep land it’s stolen.
“Trump is right to try to end the war, but getting to peace will require strength — including, if Putin keeps playing games, strengthening Ukraine. Remember, Russia itself is running out of manpower and materiel.”
Trump Strikes Houthi Terrorists, Warns Iran
The Associated Press wrote on March 14:
“President Donald Trump said he ordered a series of airstrikes on the Houthi-held areas in Yemen on Saturday, promising to use ‘overwhelming lethal force’ until the Iran-backed rebels cease their attacks on shipping along a vital maritime corridor… He also warned Iran to stop supporting the rebel group, promising to hold the country ‘fully accountable’ for the actions of its proxy…
“A U.S. official said this was the beginning of air strikes on Houthi targets that are expected to continue.”
Trump and Sudani Kill ISIS Terrorists
Politico wrote on March 15:
“A joint Iraq-U.S. operation killed a leader of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, according to Washington and Baghdad. Abdallah Makki Muslih al-Rufay’i, also known as Abu Khadija, was responsible for Islamic State operations, logistics and planning and directed ‘a significant portion of finance for the group’s global organization,’ the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) said… Friday. He was killed alongside one other IS operative in a ‘precision airstrike’ in Iraq’s western Al Anbar province, CENTCOM said.
“Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said Khadija was considered ‘one of the most dangerous terrorists in Iraq and the world.’…
“Islamic State seized large swathes Syria and northern Iraq in 2014… [It] has remained active… U.S. commander General Michael Erik Kurilla said Khadija was ‘one of the most important ISIS members in the entire global ISIS organization.’”
America First—An Impossibility
Focus wrote on March 12:
“Perhaps Trump has fallen so in love with the idea of a Fortress America that fends off foreign people (migrants) and goods (imports) alike that he is willing to test the robustness of the financial and labor markets in his first year in office…
“Perhaps later, when historians, rather than psychologists, have passed judgment, we will realize: America First was not an option in an interconnected world, but an impossibility.”
Needed—a European Army
Indianetwork News wrote on March 14:
“The European rearmament is ‘a first necessary step’ [towards a European Army]… the former president of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, [said]…
“‘When Russia attacked Ukraine I told myself if we had had a common army, it would not have done it ‘… [We need] one in which ‘there is a common [only or single] command in which everyone participates.’”
Europe WILL have a common army, and IT will attack Russia and other Far Eastern nations, but they will retaliate.
Germany War-Ready?
Deutsche Welle reported on March 14:
“The conservative CDU/CSU bloc… and the SPD have agreed in principle with the Greens on plans for a massive increase in state borrowing ahead of a parliamentary vote next week. The debt reform plan, put forward jointly by the conservatives and the SPD, would exempt defense spending from the country’s constitutionally enshrined debt brake… ‘It is a clear message to our partners and friends, but also to our opponents, to the enemies of our freedom: we are capable of defending ourselves and we are now fully prepared to defend ourselves,’ [Merz] said… ‘There will be no shortage of financial resources to defend freedom and peace on our continent… Germany is making its major contribution to the defense of freedom and peace in Europe.’
“Meanwhile, Social Democrat co-leader Lars Klingbeil said a major government borrowing and investment push was a ‘powerful boost’ for Europe’s largest economy. ‘We have laid the foundation for Germany to get back on its feet and protect itself,’ Klingbeil said…”
Suddenly, all leading politicians are united in their view that Germany must become war-ready. Note the following articles.
Guttenberg Paints a Bleak Picture of German Foreign Policy
Die Deutsche Handwerkszeitung (“The German Crafts Newspaper”) wrote on March 14:
“Former Federal Minister of Economics Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg has… sharply criticized German foreign policy over the past decades. ‘We have settled into a state of dependence,’ he said. The country has been in a ‘deep sleep.’ The dependence on the US for defense, previously on Russia for energy supplies, and on China for trade is worrying. These interdependencies have put Germany in a dangerous situation. ‘The law of the strongest prevails again,’ Guttenberg emphasized, referring to Washington, Moscow, and Beijing.
“He made it clear that Europe can no longer rely on US protection. ‘The world after Donald Trump’s reign will never be the same.'”
In this context, please view our recent StandingWatch program, titled, “Politicians Demand What We Have Told You For Decades!”
Schulz: America No Longer Wants to Be a Partner!
Forum wrote on March 14:
“The formation of a new federal government is under enormous pressure. The Trump administration’s policies demand swift and decisive reactions from Europeans. They, in turn, expect a strong role from Germany. Martin Schulz, [former President of the European Parliament], demands: We should accept the fight…
“‘The Federal Republic of Germany must assume a leading role in the European Union… I believe we must soberly acknowledge that the United States of America, under the leadership of this President, no longer wants to be a partner of the Europeans. The US views Europe as enemy territory… The 450 million people on this continent, even if we are not all rich, represent the richest region in the world with the greatest purchasing power. We don’t need to hide from the United States of America, quite the opposite…”
Germany Must Lead!
Vorwaerts wrote on March 13:
“[European Council President] António Costa… made it clear: ‘We need Germany with its determined investments in our common defense…’ Because the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine has shown how urgently it is necessary to build a European defense…
“SPD Chairman Lars Klingbeil [said:] ‘The West as we knew it is finished, at the latest with the re-election of Donald Trump’… This is also why Europe is needed more than ever… ‘This can only succeed if we finally make Europe strong,’ Klingbeil demanded. At the same time, Europe is more fragile than it has been for a long time. ‘Europe is at a crossroads; either we pull ourselves together and move forward together, or Europe dies… Peace in Europe is in danger today,’ Klingbeil said. To defend it, Germany has a leadership role to play. ‘We must be prepared to take on this leadership role,’ he demanded.”
“Germany’s Bundestag Votes in Favor of Reforming ‘Debt Brake’”
Deutsche Welle wrote on March 18:
“The multibillion-euro package loosens borrowing limits and allows new investments in defense, infrastructure and climate… The legislation now goes to the upper house of parliament, the Bundesrat, where a vote is scheduled for Friday…
“DW’s political correspondent Michaela Kuefner has said a vote in favor of the changes would give chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz a free hand when it comes to defense spending. ‘It means he would have the money to do what he says he wants to do, which is for Germany to take more of a leading role in Europe… spending more on European defense… He effectively has a blank check when it comes to defense spending which is fully exempt from the debt brake…
“AFD co-leader Tino Chrupalla has accused the conservative CDU/CSU and center-left Social Democrats of a ‘spectacle’ in bringing the vote on the debt brake before the outgoing Bundestag. The package has been brought to the old parliament rather than the newly elected one, due to hold its first session on March 25, because parties that were unlikely to agree to the change have just over one-third of the seats in the new chamber….”
NPR added on March 18:
“The package will exempt from the debt rules spending on defense and security, including intelligence agencies and assistance to Ukraine, worth more than 1% of GDP. It also foresees a 500 billion-euro ($544 billion) fund, financed by borrowing, to pour funding into Germany’s infrastructure over the next 12 years and help restore the stagnant economy — Europe’s biggest — to growth. At the Greens’ insistence, 100 billion euros from the investment fund will go into climate-related spending.”
The French-German Engine Is Running Again… Thanks to Trump
Politico wrote on March 19:
“French President Emmanuel Macron has finally found the kindred German spirit he’s spent years looking for — and he has Donald Trump to thank… France is delighting at the prospect of a German leader [Merz] who, even before taking office, is moving with urgency to clear a path for his country to invest billions of euros in infrastructure and arms…
“Merz and Macron were probably always going to get along well. Both are former creatures of the corporate world, though Merz’s career in the private sector — which included stints at white shoe law firm Mayer Brown and on the board of investment firm BlackRock — was much longer than Macron’s time as a banker at Rothschild & Co.. But without Trump, it’s not clear that the two leaders would’ve gotten off on such good footing.”
Britain to Become a “Second-Tier” European Nation?
Daily Mail wrote on March 13:
“Britain is on course to becoming a ‘second tier’ European nation like Spain or Italy due to economic decline and a weak military that undermines its usefulness to allies, an expert has warned.
“Research professor Dr Azeem Ibrahim OBE concluded in a damning new report that the U.K. has been paralysed by low investment, high tax and misguided policies that could see it lose its standing as a top-tier middle power at current growth rates… ‘Britain no longer has the industrial base to logistically sustain a war with a near-peer like Russia for more than two months,’ he wrote in The Henry Jackson Society’s latest report, Strategic Prosperity: The Case for Economic Growth as a National Security Priority.
“The report assesses… that [Poland’s] military will soon surpass the U.K.’s along lines of both manpower and equipment on the current trajectory… Britain’s usefulness to its allies is now ‘falling behind even second-tier European powers’, [Ibrahim] warned…
“The former advisor to the 2021 Integrated Defence and Security Review noted in the report that in spite of the ‘weakening’ of the institutions once ‘secured’ by the U.S., Britain is responding by harming the last vestiges of its military might and economic power. The U.K., he said, ‘seems to be making increasingly expensive gestures’ like the £9bn handover of the strategic Chagos Islands and opening talks on reparations for Caribbean Slavery….”
The former glory of the British Empire has long passed, but the Bible says that Britain (Ephraim) does not realize it.
Portugal Rejects F-35 Jets Due to U.S. Unpredictability
BulgarianMilitary.com wrote on March 14:
“Portugal has slammed the lid on any flicker of hope that it might one day strap into [America’s] Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Lightning II… Defense Minister Nuno Melo laid down the law: the fifth-generation jet isn’t in Portugal’s future, and Donald Trump’s fresh stint in the White House is a glaring reason why… it’s a blaring alarm about how a NATO ally is weighing U.S. trustworthiness in an era that’s starting to feel like a geopolitical rollercoaster…
“As of March 2025, 14 NATO nations are either flying or waiting on F-35s, locking it in as the alliance’s top bird. For Lockheed Martin, every potential customer is a lifeline. Foreign sales keep the factory humming in Fort Worth, Texas… Portugal was never a sure bet, but it’s hard ‘no’ prick the bubble of F-35 inevitability just the same… The White House has sold the F-35 as a unifier, a way to stitch NATO together with shared tech and tight-knit ops. Portugal’s rejection, even of a what-if buy, frays that story at the edges…
“European rigs like the Eurofighter Typhoon or Dassault Rafale keep popping up in the rumor mill, offering a clean break from U.S. strings. The Typhoon, flown by Germany, Spain, and the UK, packs a multirole punch and slots into NATO’s playbook, though its price tag rivals the F-35’s… The stakes reach way beyond Portugal’s hangars. Its Atlantic perch makes it a keystone in NATO’s western wall, especially as Russian subs and surface ships poke around more often, testing the edges of allied waters.
“The F-35’s stealth cloak and sensor suite would’ve handed Lisbon a razor-sharp edge in that cat-and-mouse game—something its aging F-16s can’t even fake… If other small NATO players—say, Slovakia or Romania—start sniffing around non-American kit, the ripples could swell into a tide…”
Another American ally turning against the USA.
Acquiring Greenland?
The Hill wrote on March 13:
“President Trump on Thursday expressed confidence the United States would annex Greenland, even suggesting the head of the NATO alliance could be a key player in facilitating the acquisition. ‘I think it will happen,’ Trump told reporters in the Oval Office during a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte… ‘You know, Mark, we need that for international security,’ Trump said, gesturing to Rutte.
“Rutte agreed that Greenland and the Arctic Circle are critical for security reasons, noting that China and Russia have a growing presence in the region. But he said any discussion about Trump’s attempts to acquire Greenland were outside of his purview. ‘I don’t want to drag NATO in that,’ Rutte said.”
Daily Mail wrote on March 14:
“Greenland’s Prime Minister has declared ‘enough is enough’ in response to President Donald Trump’s threat to dispatch soldiers to annex the island… [Trump said:] ‘We have a couple of bases on Greenland already and we have quite a few soldiers. May be you will see more and more soldiers go there,’ he threatened…
“In early January, after he was elected but before inauguration, Trump indicated he was willing to use force on both Greenland and Panama…”
Reclaiming the Panama Canal?
Express wrote on March 13:
“Donald Trump has reportedly ordered the US military to come up with plans to increase the number of troops in Panama as part of his mission to ‘reclaim’ the canal. US Southern Command, responsible for security cooperation and operations in Central America, has drafted ideas such as working with the Panamanian military and US troops taking the canal by force… The likelihood of military force depends on the level of partnership agreed upon by the Panamanian military…
“The US president said last week that ‘to further enhance our national security, my administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal, and we’ve already started doing it’. While it remains unclear what ‘reclaiming’ means,… US Southern Command chief Admiral Alvin Holsey sent draft strategies to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth this week ahead of his visit to Panama next month. [It was] stressed that military action in Panama would only be considered if the country does not allow Mr Trump to ‘reclaim’ the canal.”
Conquering Canada?
NBC News wrote on March 14:
“Speaking with reporters in the Oval Office, Trump… riffed about how Canada shouldn’t exist as a sovereign country before getting to what has increasingly become a fixation: wholesale annexation of Canada as a U.S. state… ‘If you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through it, between Canada and the U.S. Just a straight, artificial line. Somebody did it a long time ago, many many decades ago. Makes no sense… why should we subsidize another country for $200 billion?… we don’t need their lumber, we don’t need their energy. We have more than they do. We don’t need anything. We don’t need their cars. I’d much rather make the cars here. And there’s not a thing that we need. Now, there will be a little disruption, but it won’t be very long. But they need us. We really don’t need them. And we have to do this. I’m sorry.’
“Trump has been unapologetic in his quest to conquer the Canadians… Few think he’s joking…, and the Canadians have stopped laughing. A source with direct knowledge of the discussions told NBC News that Trump is heavily focused on Canada in conversations with aides, who believe he is completely serious about making the country the 51st state — even with Trudeau out of power and a new prime minister in place…
“The president made clear in a phone call with Trudeau last month that he wants to revise the boundary between the two nations set by a 1908 border treaty… The president has also mentioned renegotiating agreements that dictate how the Great Lakes and Columbia River are governed… Trump wants to control the Northwest Passage, a maritime path that begins west of Greenland and cuts through Northern Canada to the Arctic Ocean…”
All of this causes America’s “friends” to become extremely alarmed.
A New Travel Ban?
Newsmax wrote on March 14:
“The Trump administration is considering a three-tiered travel ban targeting 43 countries, including 11 that would be hit with an outright ban on all travel to the United States, The New York Times reported Friday.
“Iran, Libya, North Korea, and Venezuela are among the ‘red’ list countries whose citizens would be barred from entering the U.S., according to the Times.
“Another 10 countries on the ‘orange’ list, including Russia and Pakistan, would be slapped with sharp restrictions on visas; the rest of the countries, the ‘yellow’ list, would require 60 days to address concerns, according to the report.
“The restrictions being considered are broader than the travel ban Trump implemented in January 2017 on seven majority-Muslim countries, all of which are on the ‘red’ list this time around save for Iraq, which is not targeted for any ban or restriction, according to the Times.
“The State Department compiled the list of 43 countries several weeks ago and changes by the White House are likely, the Times reported. Those likely to be banned on the ‘orange’ list include people on tourist visas while business travelers might be allowed in, according to the report. Regardless, any person on the ‘orange’ list would be subjected to a mandatory, in-person interview to receive a visa, the Times reported.
“Other ‘red’ list countries include Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, according to the report.
“The other ‘orange’ list countries include Belarus, Eritrea, Haiti, Laos, Myanmar, Sierra Leone, South Sudan and Turkmenistan, the Times reported.
“The ‘yellow’ list is composed of Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Chad, the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, São Tomé and Príncipe, Vanuatu, and Zimbabwe, according to the report.”
Although not yet final, these preparations create further animosity towards the USA.
Deporting Green Card Holders?
ABC News wrote on March 13:
“The detaining of Mahmoud Khali, the Columbia University student and Palestinian activist who possessed a green card, has raised questions about the deportation risks faced by lawful permanent residents amid the Trump administration’s escalating crackdown on immigration. President Donald Trump’s administration, which has alleged that Khalil was a supporter of Hamas, has said it has the authority to deport Khalil under the Immigration and Nationality Act. ‘Secretary [Marco] Rubio reserves the right to revoke the visa of Mahmoud Khalil under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Secretary of State has the right to revoke a green card or a visa for individuals who are adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States of America,’ White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a press conference this week. Khalil… is married to an American citizen who is eight months pregnant…
“Under the Immigration Nationality Act,… the government can charge a green card holder as being deportable without being convicted of a crime if there are reasonable grounds to believe they engaged in certain criminal or terrorist activities… But experts and immigration attorneys… said the statute does not give the secretary of state the power to deport green card holders like Khalil without going through a procedure… After the federal government invokes the statute, individuals like Khalil are entitled to argue their case before an immigration judge. Khalil is set to appear before an immigration judge later this month in Louisiana…
“Experts told ABC News there are a number of reasons why an individual could lose their green card, including marriage fraud, immigration fraud, violent crimes and other offenses. Andrew Nietor, an immigration attorney, told ABC News said that while there are cases where the government invokes the Immigration and Nationality Act for certain green card holders with criminal convictions, he said he has never seen a case like Khalil’s…”
Voice of America added on March 13:
“In immigration court, the burden of proof is on the government; it must show the person violated immigration laws. In a case like Khalil’s, ICE attorneys will ask for deportation, but they will have to prove he is a threat to national security.”
Unconstitutional?
Zeteo added on March 13:
“Yes, a green card holder (or lawful permanent resident) can be deported. The most common way is if they committed a crime. But in Khalil’s case, he has not been charged with any crime. Instead, Secretary of State Marco Rubio personally signed off on targeting Khalil using a narrow, little-used authority from the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Under the provision – section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) – an immigrant who is not a citizen or US national, but ‘whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.’
“While the provision has an exception for conduct deemed ‘lawful’ in the US (such as free speech), the exception has an exception: if the secretary of state ‘personally determines that the alien’s admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.’ That personal determination seems to be driving Rubio’s insistence that the Trump administration can deport legal permanent residents whom it deems to be ‘pro-Hamas.’…
“It’s worth mentioning that the Jewish publication Forward called the INA a ‘McCarthy-era antisemitic law’ that was widely viewed at the time of its passage in 1952 as a way to target ‘Eastern European Jewish Holocaust survivors suspected of being Soviet agents.’…
“The Department of Homeland Security on Saturday accused Khalil of leading ‘activities aligned to Hamas’ and said authorities detained Khalil ‘in support of President Trump’s executive orders prohibiting anti-Semitism.’ The Trump administration has not provided any specific evidence on which it is basing its determination. Khalil’s legal team has rejected the Trump administration’s claim that Khalil supported a terrorist organization…
“It’s worth noting, however, that a district court in 1996 did find that the provision was ‘unconstitutionally vague,’ said Lindsay Nash, an associate professor at Cardozo School of Law and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic. According to Nash, the judge, who was none other than Donald Trump’s sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, essentially said that ‘providing the secretary of state [the ability] to determine deportability’ deprives the court of the role it would ‘normally have in reviewing these types of determinations.’ The law, the court said, also doesn’t give non-citizens a way to know what is prohibited, and it violated procedural due process because ‘it provides no opportunity to be heard on the charges against you before you’re determined to be deportable,’ Nash told Zeteo. Ultimately, the court found the provision was an ‘unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive.’ However, that ruling was thrown out by an appeals court, which did not comment on the constitutionality of the provision but rather said the district court did not have jurisdiction in the case.
“Courts have previously found that green card holders, who are lawful permanent residents, are protected by the Constitution, including First Amendment rights. ‘Technically, the text of the First Amendment does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens – so all persons in the US should be entitled to First Amendment protections,’ [attorney] McKanders told Zeteo.
“For now, Khalil remains detained in an ICE facility in Louisiana. A federal judge in New York has ordered the government not to deport Khalil while a challenge to his detention is pending… Separately, Khalil is scheduled to appear before an immigration judge in Louisiana on March 27…”
We most certainly do not condone the—at times violent—antisemitic activities and anti-Israel protests of the students at Columbia University. But this case has much broader application than just the person of Khalil. It does already have a chilling effect on green card holders and creates an uncertainty as to their rights and privileges. In this regard, the following [incorrect] comments by JD Vance are of great concern.
JD Vance Off-Base… Again!
India Today wrote on March 13:
“US Vice President JD Vance has said that green card holders in the United States do not have an indefinite right to stay in the country and can be deported at the administration’s discretion… Vance said that the decision is ultimately about whom the American public wants to include in the national community… Vance stressed that if the US President or the Secretary of State decides that a person should not be in the country, ‘they have no legal right to stay here. It is as simple as that’.
“When asked about more deportations similar to that of … Khalil, Vance said the US would certainly see some people get deported if the country determines that it is not in the best interest to have them.”
In light of the foregoing articles, the issue is not that simple. Vance, who is also an attorney, is clearly off base, legally, with his comments.
Germany Monitors USA
Deutsche Welle wrote on March 17:
“Germany is ‘monitoring’ how its citizens are treated when traveling to the United States, a Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Monday. The announcement comes after the recent detention of three Germans in separate incidents. Two have been deported, but one person is still being detained. Foreign Ministry spokesman Sebastian Fischer said Germany was trying to assess ‘whether this represents a change in American immigration policy or whether these are isolated cases.’…
“Fabian Schmidt, the German still in detention, was arrested at Logan Airport in Boston last week after returning from Luxembourg. He is being held at the Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility in Rhode Island. Schmidt is an electrical engineer who has been living in the US since 2007. It’s unclear why Schmidt, a US Green Card holder, was detained…
“Tourists from EU countries such as Germany typically have visa-free access to the United States for up to 90 days. Two German tourists said they tried to enter the US legally but were detained and eventually sent back home.
“Lucas Sielaff, a 25-year-old German, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials on February 18 as he and his US fiancée were crossing the border from Mexico, according to Der Spiegel. He spent two weeks in detention after his entry permit was canceled at the Mexican border.
“Jessica Brösche, a 29-year-old tattoo artist from Berlin, was also taken into custody at the Mexican border as she tried to cross with a US friend in late January, the magazine said. Brösche originally planned to stay in LA until mid-February, according to her Instagram profile. She was also returned to Germany last week. Both were held at the Otay Mesa Detention Center, a prison in San Diego, California, before being sent back to Germany…
“Tourists from other Western countries have reportedly also been detained by US immigration authorities recently. It appears to be a result of the strict immigration policies implemented by President Donald Trump.”
Subsequently, a fourth case involving a German citizen, as well as cases involving British citizens, have been reported. These are hardly isolated cases. A Canadian actress was also detained after she tried to enter the USA from Mexico legally with filled-out documentation. All those detained report on the inhumane, horrible and filthy conditions in those detention centers.
Musk in Trouble Again
Indy100.com wrote on March 14:
“Elon Musk has sparked backlash after the billionaire reposted on his social media platform X… a post which declared that Hitler ‘didn’t murder millions of people,’ but rather it was public sector employees.
“The post in full read, ‘Stalin, Mao, and Hitler didn’t murder millions of people. Their public sector workers did.’ It appears Musk has since taken down the repost…”
What a ridiculous post. Utter appalling nonsense.
The Daily Beast added on March 14:
“Six million Jews were systematically killed as a result of Hitler’s maniacal quest for what he saw as racial purity during his reign as Germany’s Führer between 1933 and 1945… Stalin, who led the Soviet Union from 1924 until his death in 1953, had nearly a million of his own citizens murdered and millions more are thought to have perished in forced labor camps, famine, and massacres under his regime. ‘Chairman’ Mao Zedong founded the People’s Republic of China and led the country from 1949 until his death in 1976. During that time, tens of millions died as a result of maltreatment, starvation, and Communist Party purges.”
China Preparing for Taiwan Invasion?
The New York Post wrote on March 14:
“Photos emerged Friday that apparently show China’s newly constructed and behemoth naval vessels that experts have reportedly suggested would fit right into a strategy for an invasion of the coveted island of Taiwan. Naval News first reported months ago that China was building at least five unique, massive barges outfitted with a long road-bridge extending 393-feet from their bow that could be used to land tanks on a shore… vessels fitting that description [are pictured] in Guangzhou Shipyard in southern China upriver of the coastal Hong Kong.
“‘Any invasion of Taiwan from the mainland would require a large number of ships to transport personnel and equipment across the Strait quickly, particularly land assets like armored vehicles,’ Dr. Emma Salisbury, Sea Power Research Fellow at the Council of Geostrategy, told Naval News. This extended reach capability of the ships means that China could choose from a wider range of targets for landing their ships than previously considered and would no longer be reliant on Taiwanese ports for landing military vehicles, according to Naval News.”
Naval News had already written on January 10:
“The traditional view is that there are only a small number of beaches on the main island of Taiwan which are suitable for amphibious landings. And these could be heavily defended. [China] could seize fishing villages or a port for larger scale landings. But the view has been that any attempt to take the islands by force would mean landing in predictable places. These new barges change that.
“The extreme reach of the Bailey Bridges means that [China] could land at sites previously considered unsuitable. They can land across rocky, or soft, beaches, delivering the tanks directly to firmer ground or a coastal road. This allows China to pick new landing sites and complicate attempts to organize defences. Instead of relying on Taiwanese ports, China can now sail its own mobile port across the straits.”
The article referred to China as “PRC—the People’s Republic of China.” We replaced this with “China” in brackets. PRC is as much a misnomer as the reference to the former DDR—the “German Democratic Republic.” In both cases, we are or were speaking of total dictatorships.
Return to the Temple Mount?
Israel 365 News wrote on March 12:
“Right-wing Ministers and MKs addressed a letter today (Monday) to members of the US Senate, calling on them to promote a declaration in Congress to ‘recognize the eternal and inalienable right of the Jewish people to the Temple Mount.’ The letter was signed by Minister of Communications Shlomo Karhi and Minister of Culture and Sports Miki Zohar from the Likud and several MKs from the Likud, Religious Zionism, and Otzma Yehudit factions. ‘This is the place where our Temples stood, which were destroyed by the Babylonian and Roman empires about 2,500 and 1,900 years ago,’ it said.
“The initiative is being led by a group of temple activists led by Beyadenu – Returning to the Temple, following the victory of Donald Trump and the Republicans in the US elections… Yosef Rabin, Chairman of Shofar in Zion, said, ‘With Trump’s return to power, we have a historic opportunity to correct the international narrative on the Temple Mount and rectify the grave injustice perpetrated against the Jewish people. The denial of the Jewish people’s religious and national rights to the Temple Mount must end… We are facing a modern-day Cyrus moment, and it is our duty to seize it. We must declare loudly: there is no Zionism without Mount Zion—this is a fight for the soul of the land.’”
“Tom Nissani, CEO of Beyadenu – Returning to the Temple Mount, one of the initiators of the letter, said, ‘This important letter calls for the adoption of an important and natural call that will come from our friend overseas that recognizes and confirms the exclusive right of the people of Israel to their holiest place, the Temple Mount… The American administration supports full Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount.’”
The “modern-day Cyrus moment” is of course not limited to just having access to the Temple Mount. As we all know, Cyrus allowed the Jews to build the Second Temple.
Israel Attacks Gaza
Newsmax wrote on March 17:
“Israel launched a wave of airstrikes across the Gaza Strip early Tuesday, saying it was striking dozens of Hamas targets in its heaviest assault in the territory since a ceasefire took effect in January… Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had ordered the strikes because of a lack of progress in ongoing talks to extend the ceasefire. Officials said the operation was open-ended and was expected to expand. ‘Israel will, from now on, act against Hamas with increasing military strength,’ Netanyahu’s office said…
“The surprise overnight attack… raised questions about the fate of the roughly two dozen Israeli hostages held by Hamas who are believed to still be alive… Israel’s defense minister, Israel Katz, said the ‘gates of hell will open in Gaza’ if the hostages aren’t released. ‘We will not stop fighting until all of our hostages are home and we have achieved all of the war goals,’ he said.”
Itamar Ben-Gvir Returns
Newsmax wrote on March 19:
“Itamar Ben-Gvir on Wednesday returned to Israel’s government as national security minister after it carried out a wave of heavy strikes that killed over 400 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
“Ben-Gvir had left Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition in January to protest the ceasefire with Hamas, which was shattered by Israel’s bombardment Tuesday… Ben-Gvir supports the full resumption of the war with the aim of annihilating Hamas, depopulating Gaza through what he refers to as the voluntary migration of Palestinians and rebuilding Jewish settlements there.”
In August of 2024, Ben-Gvir famously proclaimed that “he would build a Jewish synagogue at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in occupied East Jerusalem if he could.” In this context, it was mentioned that “the campaign to build a ‘Third Temple’ on Al-Aqsa is growing in Israel” and that “Hamas… called on Arab and Islamic countries ‘to take responsibility for protecting the holy sites’” (Aljazeera, dated August 26, 2024).
Ludicrous Decision Against Starbucks
The New York Post wrote on March 15, 2025:
“Starbucks will have to fork over $50 million to a man whose genitals were severely burned after a hot tea spilled in his lap at a California drive-through. Delivery driver Michael Garcia underwent skin grafts and other procedures after the fateful spill of the piping hot, venti-sized Starbucks beverage, which immediately fell onto his crotch area after he bought it on Feb. 8, 2020… a Los Angeles County jury decided in his favor, finding an employee of the Seattle-based coffee chain had not wedged the scalding hot drink into a takeout tray well enough before handing it over to him…
“In July of 2023, a South Florida jury awarded $800,000 in damages to the family of then-4-year-old Olivia Caraballo for the second-degree burns she suffered when a hot Happy Meal Chicken McNugget fell in her lap in 2019.”
CNN reported on March 14 that “damages included physical pain, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, humiliation, inconvenience, grief, disfigurement, physical impairment, anxiety and emotional distress… The lawsuit is reminiscent of a famous 1994 lawsuit against McDonald’s in which a woman spilled hot coffee on her lap and suffered third-degree burns. The plaintiff in that case… was originally awarded nearly $3 million.”
This decision against Starbucks, as well as the previous decision against McDonald’s and, to a lesser degree, the Happy Meal Chicken McNugget, will go into the annals of history as some of the most ludicrous ones in the 20th and 21st centuries. Our legal system, based in part on a questionable and manipulative jury system with emotionally charged and quite biased jurors, is SO broken!!!
“What Happens in Our Brain When We Die?”
Die Welt wrote on March 13:
“What do people experience in the last seconds of their lives? Current research shows: Shortly before death, there is a renewed surge of intense neuronal activity in the brain…
“Neuropsychologist Dr. Christian Hoppe of the University Hospital of Bonn explains that medical death is defined by the irreversible loss of all brain functions. Nevertheless, studies show that the brain can once again be exceptionally active in the final moments. Experiments with dying patients have shown that some brain regions emit particularly intense electrical impulses—particularly those responsible for conscious experience.
“This high-frequency activity could indicate that the brain is still processing experiences in the last seconds of life. It’s even possible that a form of consciousness could exist shortly before the final extinction. Many people report near-death experiences—such as seeing a light at the end of a tunnel or the feeling of leaving one’s own body. Researchers suspect that these phenomena are due to neurological processes. For example, stimulation of the visual cortex can cause people to perceive a point of light—a possible explanation for the often-described ‘light at the end of the tunnel.’
“The feeling of out-of-body experience—seeing oneself from above or being outside one’s own body—can also be artificially induced by targeted stimuli in the brain or through virtual reality. These experiments suggest that near-death experiences are not supernatural but have neurological causes.”
These are really interesting comments. We know, of course, that a person does not keep on living when he dies.
Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:
These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.