On March 15, 2025, Frank Bruno will present the sermonette, titled, “Red Tape,” and Dave Harris will present the sermon, titled, “God Is Our Refuge.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

When playing a sport, focus is crucial, especially where a ball is involved.  When keeping your eye on the ball, all your attention and focus are fixed on that object.  The moment you look away, it becomes challenging to successfully achieve what you are trying to accomplish, whether it be kicking the ball or catching it, hitting it, etc, depending on the sport. 

Based on the fast-paced nature and need for precise ball control, table tennis is often considered the sport that requires the most focus when using a ball, as players must react quickly to the ball’s trajectory and spin while maintaining a high level of concentration.

Baseball is another sport that uses complex hand-eye coordination, requires rapid decision-making and a need to track a fast-moving ball with precision, where focus on the ball is vital.  Pitchers can throw a variety of pitches with different speeds and breaking motions, demanding intense focus from the hitter to track the ball’s trajectory while players in the field must react quickly to batted balls, often requiring them to anticipate where the ball will land and make split-second decisions.  It’s a mental game, and baseball heavily emphasizes the mental aspect, with players needing to manage pressure situations and stay focused even when facing adversity. 

There are of course several other sports where this is the case, as well as sports that don’t require a ball, but internal focus is a necessity and can be mentally challenging.

The world, in general, can be quite distracting, and it can be easy to get caught up in it to where our focus is affected.  Getting back on track and regaining our focus is a constant task that we must accomplish.  Our “ball” is the Kingdom of God; something that we must never lose sight of, and our mental and spiritual strengthening is through God in whom we must always look to when trials, struggles, doubts, worries, uncertainties, and need for ANY help are affecting us in some way.  

Keeping our eye on the prize is something that Paul famously depicted in Philippians 3:14, using the imagery of a race where the goal is the prize and the runner must concentrate on reaching the finish line, signifying the importance of staying focused on our ultimate goal, not giving up, despite challenges we encounter along the way. 

We are to continue running with determination, “to fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2; New International Version). This encourages us to focus on Christ at all times and not get distracted by other things, for Christ, the captain of our salvation, overcame every difficulty imaginable and was thus made perfect through sufferings (Hebrews 2:10). He expects us to do the same—to overcome all obstacles, to remain faithful and obedient, and to keep our eye on the ultimate prize.

by Norbert Link

We begin with reports on [predicted] renewed violence in unstable Syria; [unrealistic] proposals as to how to deal with Gaza; and continue with concentrating on Trump’s “whiplash” leadership which creates confusion and uncertainty, which might even be intentional, but which is also diminishing trust in the reliability of the USA.

We report on Canada’s new prime minister Mark Carney who is clearly no friend of Donald Trump and who has picked up the gauntlet; and report on the ongoing fight between the Trump administration and Zelensky, with Trump’s inconsistent and contradictory proposals and statements. We speak on the proposed “ceasefire” regarding Ukraine; and we point out additional animosity between the USA and Poland; Europe’s desire to become a nuclear power; and we discuss the possibility of America’s withdrawal from NATO, as we know it, with the proposal of Germany, as a rising military power, “taking on the leading role in the alliance.”

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Politicians Demand What We Have Told You For Decades!”

Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.

Renewed Violence in Syria 

npr wrote on March 9: 

“More than 1,300 people in Syria have been killed — many believed to be civilians — in the span of three days amid intense fighting between forces associated with Syria’s new government and those loyal to the deposed dictator Bashar al-Assad… The conflict is considered the country’s worst violence since… December. It’s also the biggest test for Syria’s new government since it has assumed power… the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights… characterized many of the killings as executions and massacres, carried out in revenge against the Alawite community, which made up Assad’s traditional base of support. The human rights group also reported burning of homes and forced displacement, worsened by the absence of international intervention. 

“The fighting broke out on Thursday near the coast after reports that Alawite gunmen ambushed and killed 16 government forces in the coastal province of Latakia. In response, the government sent reinforcements to and imposed curfews on Latakia and neighboring Tartus. At first, the casualties mainly involved those fighting on both sides… But as clashes went on, the civilian death toll skyrocketed, with many people shot at close range… Alawite leaders said their community around Latakia and Tartus have been the target of attacks for weeks, ever since the Assad regime was overthrown…” 

The Daily Mail wrote on March 8: 

“The violent clashes, which erupted Thursday, are some of the deadliest since Syria’s conflict began 14 years ago, and marked a major escalation in the challenge to the new government in Damascus, three months after insurgents took authority after removing Assad from power. Witnesses revealed how women were reportedly told to ‘walk naked’ before being shot dead [by the Syrian “security” forces] amid horrifying scenes in Syria… 

“Residents of Baniyas, one of the towns worst hit by the violence, said bodies were strewn on the streets or left unburied in homes and on the roofs of buildings, and nobody was able to collect them. One witness said that the gunmen prevented residents for hours from removing the bodies of five of their neighbors killed Friday at close range. 

“The leaders of Syria’s three main Christian churches issued a joint statement Saturday condemning ‘massacres targeting innocent civilians’…”

This was so predictable, and we DID predict it… 

Proposals and Counter Proposals for Gaza 

Deutsche Welle wrote on March 9: 

“France, Germany, Italy and the UK said on Saturday they supported an Arab-backed plan for the reconstruction of Gaza. The plan would cost $53 billion (€50.5 billion) and avoid displacing Palestinians from the territory… The Arab Summit in Cairo took place after US President Donald Trump floated a widely condemned proposal to turn the Gaza Strip into what he called the ‘Riviera of the Middle East’ and displace its residents.   

“Earlier this week, the Trump administration dismissed the… counter proposal after it was adopted. The White House said it stood by Trump’s vision, with National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes commenting late Tuesday that ‘the current proposal does not address the reality that Gaza is currently uninhabitable.’… 

“The phased reconstruction plan consists of three major stages over five years. An initial six-month recovery phase is aimed at removing debris, de-mining and building temporary housing. In the first phase, the plan calls for the building of 200,000 housing units in Gaza over the next two years. A second stage will see 200,000 more housing units. By 2030, the plan foresees hundreds of thousands of new homes housing up to 3 million people as well as an airport, industrial zones, hotels and parks. 

“Under [the new] proposal, Gaza would be governed by a reformed Palestinian Authority… France, Germany, Italy and the UK also supported the call for the removal of Hamas, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by several countries…” 

None of this seems to be realistic. 

Greenland Votes Against Trump 

gzeromedia wrote on March 12: 

“Greenland’s center-right parties trounced the ruling left-wing coalition in Tuesday’s election. In a blow to US President Donald Trump’s plans to annex the Arctic territory, a once-marginal party that favors a slow separation from Denmark is set to lead the next government… 

“Recent polling shows that 85% of Greenlanders oppose joining the US.” 

Trump’s Whiplash Leadership 

CNN wrote on March 6: 

“One day, President Donald Trump imposed a punishing tariff regime against Canada and Mexico. The next, he froze auto duties for a month after suddenly realizing that – as everyone had predicted – they could wreck a quintessential American industry. 

“Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky came to the Oval Office to sign a rare-earth minerals deal that Trump billed as a triumph for the US. But Zelensky was provoked by Vice President JD Vance and kicked out of the White House. European leaders have spent days trying to fix the debacle. 

“Elon Musk, meanwhile, is taking his chainsaw to the bureaucracy, indiscriminately firing workers… 

“At first, Trump’s early-term energy on multiple fronts was a bolt of energy as he… chased away the lethargy that marked President Joe Biden’s waning months in office. Six weeks in, however… a new realization is dawning. There doesn’t seem to be a plan… ‘There’s too much unpredictability and chaos coming out of the White House right now,’ Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly said Wednesday… 

“America’s friends are often left to puzzle over what exactly Trump is trying to do… 

“Still, the president can point to some successes with his threat-based foreign policy. For instance, his fury that a Hong Kong-based firm owned two ports at either end of the Panama Canal is precipitating  a purchase by US investment giant BlackRock… 

“The danger for the US therefore is that four more years of Trump’s antics could reshape the globe – in a way that does not comply with his vision of US dominance but leaves Americans looking in from the outside…”

And this is exactly what might happen… 

Tariffs an Act of War? 

archive.today wrote on March 3: 

“Warren Buffett (94) is one of the world’s most legendary investors. So, what does he think of tariffs and how they’ll affect the economy? The billionaire… says tariffs are ‘an act of war, to some degree.’ 

“‘Over time, they are a tax on goods. I mean, the Tooth Fairy doesn’t pay ’em!’ he said… when asked how tariffs would impact inflation. ‘And then what? You always have to ask that question in economics. You always say, ‘And then what?'” 

Good question! 

EU to Retaliate Against USA 

The Associated Press wrote on March 12: 

“The European Union on Wednesday announced retaliatory trade action with new duties on U.S. industrial and farm products, responding within hours to the Trump administration’s increase in tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to 25%. The world’s biggest trading bloc was expecting the U.S. tariffs and prepared in advance, but the measures still place great strain on already tense trans-Atlantic relations… 

“The EU measures will cover goods from the United States worth around 26 billion euros ($28 billion), and not just steel and aluminum products, but also textiles, home appliances and agricultural goods. Motorcycles, bourbon, peanut butter and jeans will also be hit, as they were during U.S. President Donald Trump’s first term…” 

Canada’s New Prime Minister… No Friend of Trump 

The Sun wrote on March 9: 

“CANADA’S new prime minister [replacing Justin Trudeau who “tearfully” stepped down Sunday] has wasted no time in firing back at US President Donald Trump, vowing to fight the escalating trade war ‘until Trump shows us respect.’ Mark Carney – who was among the anti-Brexit campaign’s biggest voices during his time as Bank of England chief – called out Trump for attempting to ‘destroy the Canadian way of life’ with tariffs and trade threats. The former Bank of England governor and ‘Project Fear’ architect made it clear that Canada will not back down. 

“‘There is someone who is trying to weaken our economy. Donald Trump. Donald Trump has put unjustified tariffs on what we build, sell and how we make a living,’ Carney said in his acceptance speech. He went on to describe Trump’s tariffs and threats as the ‘greatest crisis of our lifetime’. The war of words intensified last week after the US imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, prompting Canada to retaliate with its own tariffs on up to $155bn worth of US products.  The trade war has put a strain on the two nations’ relationship, and Carney said the US could no longer be trusted… 

“He became a popular choice for party members due to his wealth of experience after serving as governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England between 2013 up until 2020… Carney’s firm stance comes amid mounting support for his leadership in a nation reeling from the threat of becoming the ‘51st state’ and Trump’s ongoing tariff war. His speech marks a sharp shift in the rhetoric of Western leaders standing up to the US president… ‘The Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country.’… On Tuesday, the US slapped a brutal 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from Canada, and despite a softening from Trump, the damage has been done….”

npr added on March 9: 

“Mark Carney, the former central banker-turned-centrist politician, triumphed over Chrystia Freeland in Sunday’s Liberal Party leadership race, paving the way for him to succeed Justin Trudeau as Canada’s next prime minister. He is expected to be sworn in early this week… President Donald Trump’s tariffs and controversial comments about Canada becoming the 51st state likely played a role in Carney’s win and could help his party — which was struggling against the conservatives in the polls just two months ago — hold onto power in the next general election. 

“‘Canadians are really feeling angry, hurt. Canada feels so disrespected in this relationship right now,’ Jamie Tronnes, the executive director of the Center for North American Prosperity and Security told NPR. ‘This has led to a resurgent nationalism, which is something that we haven’t seen the likes of in a long time in Canada, that has really benefited the Liberal Party.’ 

“Carney’s election makes him only the second prime minister in Canadian history without a seat in parliament. While there is no rule against this, precedent suggests Carney will call federal elections soon after being sworn in as prime minister where he will face off with conservative leader Pierre Poilievre. As the Liberal party’s popularity continues to surge in the polls, many Canadians see Carney as a steady, diplomatic globalist who knows how to navigate international challenges, particularly with the U.S. under Trump’s increasingly strongman negotiating tactics… Carney knows what it’s like to weather tough economic storms. He served as Governor of the Bank of Canada during the 2008 financial crisis and later became the first non-British person to be appointed as Governor of the Bank of England, where he oversaw the bank’s post-Brexit transition.” 

Tariffs Threat Against Canada Changing by the Hour 

Bloomberg wrote on March 11:

“President Donald Trump dialed back his latest trade-war threat against Canada hours after making it, while downplaying the risk of a tariff-led recession that’s sent US markets into a nosedive. Trump’s roller-coaster day saw him threaten to double duties on Canadian steel and aluminum to 50% after Ontario announced plans to place a surcharge on electricity sent to the US, only to retreat back to plans for his previously announced 25% rate after the provincial government backed down. (USA Today: “The abrupt shift was a response to Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he would suspend a 25% electricity surcharge on about 1.5 million U.S. energy users in New York, Michigan and Minnesota… With Trump backtracking, the steel and aluminum tariff rate for Canadian imports will remain at 25%.”). 

“The episode rattled markets already bracing for the worldwide metal levies set to hit at midnight, and encapsulated the frantic and mercurial tariff barrage that has spooked investors and befuddled corporate leaders over the past six weeks. Major stock indexes were down some 10% off their peaks amid escalating concerns that the world’s biggest economy may be about to stall. Trump himself fueled the recession talk as recently as Sunday, declining to rule out the possibility in a Fox News interview.”

Trump vs. Zelensky

The Kyiv Independent wrote on March 9: 

“U.S. President Donald Trump has privately made it clear to his aides that he will not resume providing military aid and intelligence to Ukraine even if Kyiv and Washington sign a minerals deal, NBC News reported on March 9… Trump wants to see a change in President… Zelensky’s stance toward peace talks with Russia and a willingness to make concessions such as giving up occupied territories to Russia… The U.S. president also reportedly wants Zelensky to make some steps toward elections in Ukraine and possibly step down. 

“The news comes amid rising tensions between Ukraine and the U.S., as Trump escalates pressure on Zelensky to expedite a peace process. The tensions culminated in a confrontation during a meeting in the White House Oval Office on Feb. 28 after Zelensky had flown to the U.S. to sign a minerals agreement with the U.S. After being insulted by Trump and his Vice President JD Vance, Zelensky returned to Ukraine without signing the deal. Since that meeting, Washington has halted its military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine… 

“Politico reported that Trump’s team has been leading secret talks with former Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko and another opposition leader, Yuliia Tymoshenko. The two opposition leaders reportedly tried to position themselves as more flexible partners for the U.S. than Zelensky. Following the Oval Office clash, Zelensky’s approval rating has risen to 68%.” 

Is America trying to oust Zelensky? 

The Hill wrote on March 10: 

“Trump said Sunday the United States had ‘just about’ ended a suspension of intelligence sharing with Ukraine… Trump said he wanted Ukraine to ‘want to want peace… Right now, they haven’t shown it to the extent they should,’ he said.” 

Another switch in Trump’s ever-changing political world… and another example of Trump’s “whiplash leadership.” But the impression that he has no plan might be contradicted by a calculated method of unpredictability, thereby causing chaos and confusion.   

Ukrainska Pravda wrote on March 9: 

“US President Donald Trump has responded to concerns that Ukraine might not survive without American assistance by saying that Ukraine ‘may not survive anyway… ‘But you know, we have some weaknesses with Russia. You know, it takes two. It was not gonna happen, that war. And it happened. So now we’re stuck with this mess.’…” 

So, every war is caused by two sides? Where does this leave World War 2? 

“The interviewer then asked whether Ukraine really does have significant rare-earth mineral resources, to which Trump responded: ‘I do, I’ve had it checked’… Trump also claimed that under President Joe Biden, Zelenskyy had been taking money from the US as easily as ‘candy from a baby’.” 

The New York Post wrote on March 3: 

“On Sunday, Zelensky insisted that ‘an agreement to end the war is still very, very far away, and no one has started all these steps yet’ — a remark that further irked Trump.  ‘This is the worst statement that could have been made by Zelenskyy, and America will not put up with it for much longer!’ the president wrote on Truth Social. ‘It is what I was saying, this guy doesn’t want there to be Peace as long as he has America’s backing and Europe, in the meeting they had with Zelenskyy, stated flatly that they cannot do the job without the U.S.’ 

“‘Probably not a great statement to have been made in terms of a show of strength against Russia. What are they thinking?’” 

Ukraine Cease-Fire? 

Deutsche Welle wrote on March 11: 

“Ukraine says it is willing to accept an interim 30-day ceasefire in the war with Russia, a joint statement from Washington and Kyiv said. According to the statement, published following the meeting of Ukrainian and American teams in Saudi Arabia, the United States will communicate to Russia that reciprocity is key for future peace between the countries. The US said it would also resume the intelligence sharing with, and security assistance to, Ukraine.  

“US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says that it is now up to Russia to accept the proposal… Kyiv and Washington also agreed to sign an agreement for developing Ukraine’s critical mineral resources as soon as possible, the statement said.” 

Fox News wrote on March 12: 

“Russia is waiting for Washington to deliver details… before commenting on the proposal, the Kremlin said Wednesday… Russia has so far opposed anything short of a permanent end to the conflict and has not accepted any concessions.” 

Russia Will Never Relent 

The Telegraph wrote on March 11: 

“But suppose the Russians do not reciprocate? Now there is one vital question: how will America respond if… Putin simply rejects the Jeddah offer? He will be deeply reluctant to accept a ceasefire at the very moment when his forces are finally advancing against Ukraine’s salient in the Russian region of Kursk.  In Putin’s preferred sequence, a ceasefire would be the last step, when everything else has been settled, allowing the Russians to maintain every ounce of military pressure to wring concessions from Ukraine throughout any negotiations… 

“Perhaps more likely is that Russia will pretend to accept the Jeddah offer and do just enough to prevent America from renewing its backing for Ukraine while in fact breaking the ceasefire and finding a way of blaming Mr Zelensky…” 

Poland’s Walesa Blasts Trump 

AFP wrote on March 3, 2025: 

“Poland’s freedom icon Lech Walesa and dozens of other communist-era dissidents on Monday slammed Donald Trump over his clash with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, comparing the US president’s actions to ‘communist courtrooms.’ 

“In their Oval Office meeting on Friday, Trump berated Zelenskyy, telling him to be more ‘thankful’ for US support against the invading Russian army in the three-year war and that without US assistance, Ukraine would have been conquered by Moscow. In a letter addressed to the US president, Walesa and around 40 other Polish former dissidents said they had watched Trump’s conversation with Zelenskyy ‘with horror and disgust. The atmosphere in the Oval Office during this conversation reminded us of the hearings by the Security Service and in the communist courtrooms,’ former Polish president Walesa and fellow dissidents said in the letter. 

“‘We find your expectations of respect and gratitude for the material aid provided by the United States to Ukraine, which is fighting against Russia, offensive,’ they told Trump. Walesa is feted as an icon of freedom as he led a 1980 shipyard workers’ strike, forcing the then-authorities to recognise the communist bloc’s first and only free trade union, Solidarity. He and dozens of other top dissidents were arrested after martial law was imposed in 1981. He then won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1983. 

“After the fall of communism, Walesa in 1990 became Poland’s first democratically elected president since World War II. Poland is a staunch ally of its neighbour Ukraine and has advocated ramped up military aid to the war-torn country. On Friday, following the heated exchange in the White House, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, in a show of support to Zelenskyy, assured Ukrainians they were ‘not alone.’”

Even Poland and Poland’s icon Lech Walesa—once strong allies—are turning against the USA. 

What If Musk Cuts Off Starlink? 

Militarnyi wrote on March 3: 

“The European Commission is figuring out how it could help Ukraine secure satellite communication capacity in the wake of Elon Musk reportedly threatening to pull Kyiv’s access to his Starlink network. 

“Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier said Ukraine had already ‘expressed interest’ in how it could use Govsatcom—a pooled network of the EU’s existing national government satellite capacity.” 

Rubio and Musk Follow Trump’s Backpedaling and Anger Poland 

Reuters wrote on March 10: 

“Poland’s prime minister on Monday called on ‘friends’ to respect their allies and not be arrogant, in a post on X which… came a day after an extraordinary social media spat between top U.S. and Polish officials over Starlink. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Poland’s foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski of ‘making things up’ and suggested on Sunday he was ungrateful, in a strong rebuke after Sikorski said Ukraine may need an alternative to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite service if it becomes unreliable. 

“Poland pays for Ukraine to use the services of Starlink, which provides crucial internet connectivity to Kyiv and its military. ‘True leadership means respect for partners and allies. Even for the smaller and weaker ones,’ Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote in English on X. ‘Never arrogance. Dear friends, think about it.’ 

“Rubio had also said that ‘no one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink’. (This statement is clearly untrue. Keep reading.) ‘And say thank you because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now,’ Rubio added… Sikorski had been told to ‘be quiet’ and labelled a ‘small man’ by Musk after he suggested Poland, which says it pays $50 million per year for Ukraine’s Starlink services, might need to find another provider if Musk’s service was unreliable… 

“The U.S. government has already revoked some access to satellite imagery for Ukraine and paused intelligence sharing, piling pressure on Kyiv as Trump seeks a swift end to the war, now in its fourth year after Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. Shares in Franco-British satellite operator Eutelsat… soared as much as 650% last week due to speculation the company could replace Starlink in providing internet access to Ukraine.

“Musk, a high-profile figure in the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, said in a post on X early on Sunday that Ukraine’s ‘entire front line would collapse if I turned it (Starlink) off’. (If this is not a threat, what is?) 

“In a series of posts on X on the subject, that lasted through the day, Musk said later he would not turn off Starlink in Ukraine. ‘To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals … We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip.’” 

Rubio has become a disappointment for many by switching or abandoning his former positions and by now unequivocally supporting Trump, even when he is wrong, such as with his provocative clash with Zelensky in the Oval Office. 

Poland Wants Nuclear Weapons 

Politico wrote on March 7: 

“Poland will look at gaining access to nuclear weapons and also ensure that every man undergoes military training as part of an effort to build a 500,000-strong army to face off the threat from Russia, Prime Minister Donald Tusk told the parliament on Friday. Poland’s dramatic military expansion comes as fears grow across Europe that U.S. President Donald Trump is aligning with the Kremlin and turning his back on America’s traditional western alliances — a geopolitical shift that Warsaw regards as a potentially existential threat. 

“Tusk said that Poland ‘is talking seriously’ with France about being protected by the French nuclear umbrella… Tusk also stressed that Poland cannot restrict itself to conventional weapons… He pointed to the example of Ukraine, which gave up its nuclear arsenal and is now being attacked by Russia… 

“The Polish military is now about 200,000, which makes it the third-largest in NATO after the U.S. and Turkey and the largest among the alliance’s EU members. Tusk pointed out that Ukraine has an army of about 800,000 while Russia has 1.3 million men under arms… 

“The confusing signals coming out of the Trump administration are particularly worrying for Poland, which has built its security architecture around its close ties with the U.S. There are about 10,000 American soldiers stationed in Poland, and the country makes an effort to buy U.S. weapons systems — to the annoyance of other European countries.” 

“Time to Rearm” 

The Sun wrote on March 9: 

“THREE years on from the start of Vladimir Putin’s brutal invasion of Ukraine and the war has seen more than 1.3million killed or injured…. Zelensky’s offer to step down as Ukrainian president — in answer to Donald Trump’s bogus charge that he is a dictator— shows his commitment to peace. But he is not the problem. 

“Blood-soaked Putin has already sacrificed more than 860,000 of his own soldiers and is no more bothered by current losses of 1,500 a day than he is by the deaths of 12,000 Ukrainian civilians ruthlessly targeted by his forces. He is supported in this slaughter by the terrorists of Theran and North Korean  madman Kim Jong-un. Meanwhile, China watches on. The world is a very dangerous place right now and Europe cannot keep relying on America to fight its battles… increasing spending on defence is… about self-preservation. 

“[Britain may] raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP] by 2030 and offer 30,000 peace-keeping troops for Ukraine. But that is meaningless when we don’t have 30,000 troops to spare, when 2.5 per cent is not enough and 2030 is too far away. What are we waiting for?” 

Abandoning Nuclear Weapons? 

The Sun wrote on March 9: 

“DONALD Trump has warned ‘monster’ nuclear weapons could ‘end the world’ as he sounded the alarm over atomic armageddon. The President issued the stark warning in a TV interview on Sunday morning after he floated new arms controls with Russia and China… The US has the second largest nuclear weapons stockpile in the world with around 5,000 weapons. Russia has the most with nearly 6,000, with China a distant third with around 350. Nuclear weapons have only been used in anger twice – when the US bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War 2. 

“Speaking on Fox, Trump said: ‘We spend a lot of money [on] nuclear weapons – the level of destruction is beyond anything you can imagine. It’s just bad that you have to spend all this money on something that if it’s used, it’s probably the end of the world.’… It comes [as] France offered to use its nukes to protect Europe from Russia… Moscow said the speech was threatening towards Russia and had ‘notes of nuclear blackmail.’…” 

Europe will not abandon its nuclear weapons. Note the previous article about Poland. 

No More Trust in the USA 

Deutsche Welle wrote on March 7: 

“Two thirds of respondents in this latest ‘ARD Deutschlandtrend’ poll said they are in favor of a massive budget increase for the Bundeswehr, and eight out of ten are in favor of more money for infrastructure projects…. 

“Trump has been back in office for only six weeks and has already been calling into question core policies, which is having a massive impact on how Germans view Trump and the United States. One in two respondents to the infratest poll say their opinion of Trump has worsened since he took office. Just one in seven expresses a favorable opinion of the US president. The United States’ reputation is plummeting to new lows…. 

“This month only one in six voters described the US as a partner who Germany can trust. Three quarters believe that NATO members cannot currently rely on the United States for protection… there is growing support for greater European independence. One in two said they favor establishing a European military alliance… The US policy U-turn on Ukraine significantly contributed to the decline of American prestige in Germany.” 

NATO and the EU Army 

DNA India wrote on March 7: 

“Hours after heads of state of 29 European nations met in the French capital of Paris and discussed the issue of supporting Ukraine…, US President Donald Trump dropped the bombshell. Trump said in the most undiplomatic way, for which he is known, that if the member states do not pay for NATO’s expenses, he will not defend them.  

“Emphasising that all members of the trans-Atlantic bloc, big or small, rich or poor, must pay for the common cause of security, he declared, ‘If they don’t pay, I’m not going to defend them. No, I’m not going to defend them.’ Trump raised this issue in the first term of his presidency also and forced small countries like the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia to pay. A day earlier, when a journalist asked him in the Oval Office of the White House whether France and a couple of other countries would defend the US, Trump said, ‘You think they’re going to come and protect us?…’ 

“Earlier, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in February that Washington would not participate in any peacekeeping force in Ukraine, which is not a NATO member and would not defend any country that participated in it if attacked by Russia… 

“The idea of a European Army is not new, however, it got a boost this week after EU Commissioner Ursula van der Leyen pointed out that the EU should raise EUR 800 billion for the development of the bloc, besides a separate corpus of EUR 160 billion for funding defence preparedness of the member states. Earlier the UK and France announced to increase… their defence budgets.  

“Political observers believe France, Poland, Germany, the UK, frontline states like Finland and the Nordic-Baltic states like Sweden, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia may serve as the backbone of the European Army as they have relatively strong and cohesive forces with substantial fire power. Analysts also believe the European Union may raise a common EU force or the EU Army. This force should not belong to any one nation but for the collective use of defending all members of the 27-member bloc like NATO,  

“All the European nations put together have more than 2 million men and women in uniform and they spend a whopping amount of $338 billion of their militaries. Coming back to Ukraine, if the US and Turkey oppose any move to send NATO forces to the war-torn country, the European nations may send their troops. It may lay the foundation stone of an EU Army or European Army.” 

An EU Army is clearly prophesied in the Bible.

NATO to Survive? 

Daily Mail wrote on March 3: 

“President Trump has launched his latest attack against Europe claiming that the United States should worry more about ‘migrant rape gangs and drug lords’ than Vladimir Putin or ‘end up like Europe’… The continent is also coming to terms with the brutal reality that it might not be able to rely on America for its security anymore… While Trump has so far avoided actively calling for the US to exit from NATO, he has consistently painted it as a one-sided relationship. 

“… Trump previously told reporters that he doubted the value of spending money on NATO – since the US was protecting NATO members but they were ‘not protecting us’ and has consistently called for the bloc to double its spending target.  During his first term Trump threatened to quit the alliance over his grievances about member’s defence spending.  

“Since Trump returned to the White House, the war in Ukraine has represented another growing rift between America and its European allies… 

“Trump’s advisor Elon Musk has outright called for the US to leave NATO in a post on X, formerly Twitter, over the weekend. Gunther Eagleman, a political commentator with 1.3 million followers, who describes himself as a ‘Proud America First MAGA Patriot’, wrote ‘It’s time to leave NATO and the UN’ in an X post on March 1. That message was reposted by Musk… who simply added ‘I agree’. 

“Musk also today reposted a tweet by Republican congressman Thomas Massie, the representative for Kentucky’s fourth congressional district since 2012, which called NATO ‘a Cold War relic that needs to be relegated to a talking kiosk at the Smithsonian’.” 

End of NATO? 

The Telegraph wrote on March 1: 

“End of Nato alliance could be ‘days away’, warns former commander… Wavering US support for the defence bloc may open the door to a new ‘European Treaty Organisation’, says Admiral James Stavridis…” 

“US ‘to Cease All Future Military Exercises in Europe’” 

The Telegraph wrote on March 8: 

“Nato countries could be forced to plan manoeuvres without US as Trump continues pivot away from bloc. 

“The United States has told its allies that it does not plan to participate in military exercises in Europe [beyond 2025], according to reports… It means that Nato countries will be forced to plan exercises without the participation of the US military, the largest in the alliance… 

“The Telegraph reported on Friday that Mr Trump is also considering pulling US troops out of Germany and redeploying them to Eastern Europe. He is understood to be weighing up withdrawing some 35,000 active personnel and moving them to Hungary.” 

Europe Angry With USA 

Financial Post wrote on March 1: 

“European leaders are confronting their worst-case scenario: maybe they really are going to be dealing with a bellicose Russia alone. When the United States lined up alongside Russia and North Korea earlier this week to oppose a UN motion condemning Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, some European officials knew that the transatlantic relationship was in deep trouble. Then they watched in horror as Donald Trump gave Volodymyr Zelenskiy a public dressing down in the Oval Office and something broke. 

“In interviews with Bloomberg, more than half a dozen officials who’ve maintained their composure through wars and financial crises reacted with visceral anger. For them, the scene showed the trust and values that have bound Europe and the U.S. together since the end of World War II are no longer shared. 

“‘President Trump and his administration raised a more fundamental challenge to the transatlantic alliance than it has faced in many decades,’ said Graham Allison, a professor of government at Harvard University, who studied with Henry Kissinger and served in both the Clinton and Reagan administrations. French President Emmanuel Macron, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have all described this moment as a generational challenge for the continent… 

‘After Friday’s quarrel in the Oval Office, EU leaders lined up to voice their support for Zelenskiy and make clear whose side they were on. Trump is putting the Europeans into a position where they have to choose between the U.S. and Ukraine, several officials said, and most, if not all, will pick Ukraine. For Europe, it is existential.”

Within a little more than a month of Trump’s rule, the alliance between the USA and Europe is being broken up. And calls for an EU Army are getting louder.

AfD Politicians Call for Nuclear Weapons for Germany 

Die Welt wrote on March 7: 

“Several AfD politicians are calling for… Germany to be armed with nuclear weapons. Conscription is also essential… ‘Germany needs its own nuclear weapons and compulsory military service – also for women. To achieve this, the Basic Law [Grundgesetz] must be changed as soon as possible,’ said former Bundeswehr colonel [and] AfD defense politician Rüdiger Lucassen… ‘If the US nuclear umbrella is missing, Europe must act on its own. Germany must itself become capable of nuclear deterrence – within the framework of strategic European autonomy and a system of collective security with its own military and command structure.’… 

“AfD Bundestag member Hannes Gnauck, previously chairman of the AfD youth organization Junge Alternative (JA), which is disbanding, expressed similar views to Lucassen. ‘Germany needs its own nuclear umbrella…’ If the USA actually leaves NATO, Germany must take on the leading role in the alliance.” 

Compulsory Military Service in 2025? 

Die Tagesschau wrote on March 4:

“In view of the changing threat situation and the global alliance structures, CSU politician Florian Hahn is calling for more speed in the internal German debate about the reintroduction of compulsory military service… ‘The first conscripts will have to walk through the barracks gates in 2025…’ The chairman of the Bundeswehr Association, André Wüstner, is also in favor of starting compulsory military service this year… Approval for the reintroduction of compulsory military service also comes from the former Green Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer…

“The current Minister of Defense Boris Pistorius (SPD) presented a draft law for a new military service model in November. Shortly before the traffic light coalition collapsed, the federal government agreed on it – but there was no vote in the Bundestag and Bundesrat… 

“It is now up to the new federal government to decide on a new compulsory military service in peacetime. In times of conflict, the Military Service Act already stipulates that conscription for men is reinstated when the Bundestag declares a state of tension and defence.” 

Germany Must Become a Military Power 

Die Welt wrote on March 5: 

“Green politician Joschka Fischer describes the scandal in the White House as an ‘unbelievable event’. All trust in US President Donald Trump has been destroyed, Germany must now become a military power… 

“[He also calls for] talks on extending the French and British nuclear umbrella to the whole of Europe…”

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

In the first part of this Q&A, we looked at the biblical evidence that God the Father, Jesus Christ the Word, and innumerable angels are all in the third heaven.

But are there any human beings in heaven?  What about those who have died and have lived good lives?  Did they go to heaven and live there now in a conscious state?

In Ecclesiastes 9:5 we read: “For the living know that they shall die; But the dead know nothing, And they have no more reward, For the memory of them is forgotten.” 

Psalm 146:3-4 illustrates that the day one dies, his thoughts perish.

No human being has ascended to heaven, as Jesus revealed in John 3:13, and this is a telling piece of Scripture: “No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from, and it is heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.”   

The NIV states “No one has ever gone into heaven.” The old Luther Bible says: “No one ascends to heaven.”

Acts 2:29 and 34 are also instructive on this matter:

“Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day… For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself: ‘The LORD said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand…”

And Hebrews 11:39-40 speaks of the great men and women of old and shows that they are STILL awaiting their reward: “And all these, having obtained a good testimony through faith, did not receive the promise, God having provided something better for us, that they should not be made perfect apart from us.”

For much more on this subject, please see our Q&A:  https://www.eternalgod.org/question-and-answer-1066/ and our booklet “Do We Have an Immortal Soul?”    

Those who know the doctrines of the Church of the Eternal God and its international affiliates will be fully aware that our understanding from the Word of God is that we do not go to heaven at death.

For those who may want to study this more thoroughly, please see our Q&A’s:

“What are the biblical proofs that we do not go to heaven when we die?” https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-11453/

“Do certain biblical passages tell us that we go to heaven when we die?”  https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-11468/

“How do you explain certain passages in the Bible suggesting that we go to heaven when we die?”  https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-11483/

“Doesn’t the Bible say that we will enter the kingdom of heaven? Doesn’t this show that we will go to heaven when we die?”  https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-11501/

There are some commentators who say, incredibly, that there are human beings in heaven, and in their physical state, and they even make some other even more preposterous assertions.   We have no doubt about their sincerity, but such errors are something that we must avoid.  

What is in Heaven?

We read in Exodus 20:4 the following: “You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth…”

This verse reveals that there are things in heaven.

Revelation 3:5 speaks of a “Book of Life” which is in heaven.  In our booklet “Are You Predestined to be Saved?”, we read in the first chapter, page 3, the following description: 

“‘THE BOOK OF LIFE. The most important heavenly book, or scroll, that pertains to God’s true children is mentioned numerous times in Scripture. But many who have read these references have falsely assumed that this particular book is just a figurative expression, rather than a real, albeit spiritual book. The opposite is true. The book we are talking about is a VERY real book! It is called in Scripture, ‘the Book of Life.’ For example, we read in Revelation 3:5: ‘He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I [Jesus Christ] will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.’ On its face value, and without trying to ‘interpret’ this passage, we are plainly told that the names of true Christians are written down in a particular book—the Book of Life—and that they will not be erased from it as long as they continue to overcome. We can also understand from this that their names could be blotted out from the Book of Life.”

The information below is taken from Mr Norbert Link’s very revealing booklet, “Angels, Demons and the Spirit World” on pages 59-62:

“In Revelation 20:12 we read: ‘And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.   Barnes Notes on the Bible states: ‘And the books were opened – That is, the books containing the record of human deeds.’ 

“Revelation 4:2 mentions a ‘throne set in heaven.’” 

We have seen, in part one of this Q&A that God the Father and Jesus Christ, both Spirit beings, reside in heaven.   In Psalm 47:8 we read: “God reigns over the nations; God is seated on His holy throne.”   And in Psalm 103:19: “The LORD has established His throne in heaven, and His kingdom rules over all.”

“Revelation 4:4 describes several thrones in heaven.”

The Scripture reads: “Around the throne were twenty-four thrones, and on the thrones I saw twenty-four elders sitting, clothed in white robes; and they had crowns of gold on their heads.”

“Revelation 4:6 speaks of a ‘sea of glass’ before the throne in heaven.”

The Scripture reads: “Before the throne there was a sea of glass, like crystal. And in the midst of the throne, and around the throne, were four living creatures full of eyes in front and in back.”

“Revelation 5:1 mentions a spiritual scroll, sealed with seven spiritual seals.” 

The Scripture reads: “And I saw in the right hand of Him who sat on the throne a scroll written inside and on the back, sealed with seven seals.”

“Revelation 5:8 talks about a spiritual harp and golden bowls.”

The Scripture reads: “Now when He had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each having a harp, and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.”

These golden bowls housed the prayers of God’s people, the saints, which indicates how important they are.   Incense burned in the temple in the Old Testament gave off a pleasing aroma to God, and His people’s prayers are likened to this. 

“Revelation 8:2–5 reveals the existence of a spiritual golden censer, a spiritual golden altar, and even spiritual fire.”

The Scripture reads: “And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and to them were given seven trumpets. Then another angel, having a golden censer, came and stood at the altar. He was given much incense, that he should offer it with the prayers of all the saints upon the golden altar which was before the throne. And the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, ascended before God from the angel’s hand. Then the angel took the censer, filled it with fire from the altar, and threw it to the earth. And there were noises, thunderings, lightnings, and an earthquake.”

“We are informed in the book of Hebrews that all of these spiritual objects were used as a pattern for the creation of physical objects at the time of Moses. We read in Hebrews 9:23–24, in the Living Bible: ‘That is why the sacred tent down here on earth, and everything in it—all copied from things in heaven—all had to be made pure by Moses in this way…But the REAL things in heaven, of which these down here are copies, were made pure with far more precious offerings… It was not in the earthly place of worship that He did this, for that was merely a copy of the REAL TEMPLE IN HEAVEN.’ 

“So, there is a spiritual temple in heaven (Revelation 11:19; 15:5–6, 8). Further, we read about the temple of the tabernacle. God showed Moses exactly on the mountain how to build the earthly tabernacle. Time and again we read (Exodus 25:9; 25:40; 26:30; and 27:8) that God showed Moses a pattern as to how to build the tabernacle, the altar, the golden lamp stand and the sanctuary. God showed Moses what the real spiritual heavenly things look like. Moses was also instructed to form two cherubim, which were to cover the mercy seat. Again, God showed Moses, if he did not already know, what cherubim look like… 

“Isaiah 14:13 reports that Satan, formerly Lucifer, said: ‘I will ascend into heaven. I will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will also sit on the mount of the congregation.’ Ezekiel 28:14 adds what God said about Lucifer: ‘You were the anointed cherub who covers…You were on the holy mountain of God.’ This spiritual mountain of God in heaven is also described in Hebrews 12:18–24. 

“We read about a city in heaven, the spiritual or heavenly Jerusalem (compare Hebrews 11:9–10; Revelation 3:12). It will come down to this earth in the future (Revelation 21:2–3, 10–21; 22:1–2). 

“Revelation 2:7 says that the tree of life is in the Paradise of God. Ezekiel 28:13–16 adds that Lucifer, who became Satan, was in the garden of God at the time of his creation, long before there ever was a physical world. So, we see that there is a spiritual garden of God, a Paradise, in heaven. 2 Corinthians 12:2–4 mentions that ‘Paradise,’ the spiritual garden, is in the third heaven where God dwells [and is] a heaven composed of spirit—the third heaven… where God lives (Psalm 11:4; Hebrews 9:24)]. The physical garden of Eden, which God later created for Adam and Eve, was patterned after the spiritual garden that exists in heaven, and in which is a spiritual tree of life. When the heavenly Jerusalem comes down to this earth, the heavenly garden, with the tree of life in it, will come down to this earth as well. 

“Revelation 21:1 tells us that the heavenly Jerusalem will come down from heaven to this earth, AFTER God has created a new heaven and a new earth. This will take place after all human beings have been changed into immortality or have been burned up and destroyed in the lake of fire. By that time, as we read in Revelation 20:14, death will no longer exist. We are told that death will have been cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 21:4–5 confirms that there will be NO MORE DEATH from that time on. 

“It is true that during the Millennium, certain of the things mentioned in Revelation 21 and 22 will be found on this earth as physical forerunners (Ezekiel 47:1, 7–8, 12). There are differences, however. Ezekiel 47 talks about the existence of a physical temple. When the heavenly Jerusalem comes down to this earth, after the Millennium, there will be no temple in it, ‘for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple’ (Revelation 21:22).”

In our booklet “Is That in the Bible? – The Mysteries of the Book of Revelation” page 145, we read:

“……John sees the ‘holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God’ (Revelation 21:2). This is a literal city—albeit not physical, but spiritual. (For more information on the spiritual nature of the new Jerusalem, please read our free booklet, ‘Angels, Demons and the Spirit World.’) That this city is literal and not just a symbolic reference to the Church, for example, can be seen from the very detailed and specific description in Revelation 21:10–22; 22:1–5. We are told in Revelation 21:2, in conjunction with other Scriptures, that God is presently ‘preparing’ this city in heaven (compare Revelation 3:12; Hebrews 11:9–10; 12:22; 13:14; Galatians 4:26). We also read that Jesus Christ is presently ‘preparing’ for us a place in the ‘Father’s house’—the new Jerusalem (John 14:1–3).”

What marvellous and thrilling information about who and what is in heaven—exciting and mind-blowing facts that we may not have previously fully understood or appreciated.

Lead Writer: Brian Gale (United Kingdom)

compiled by Dave Harris

“Politicians Demand What We Have Told You For Decades!” is the title of a new StandingWatch program presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

In this program, we describe a frightening development that we’ve been predicting for a long time. Until recently, most people weren’t willing to believe that something like this was possible, but today, for some, things are looking different.

“Politiker fordern, was wir Ihnen seit Jahrzehnten gesagt haben!” is the title of a new AufPostenStehen program presented by Norbert Link. This German program covers the same subjects as described above.

A new Member Letter (March 2025) has been posted and mailed to our subscribers. Pastor Brian Gale notes that the Church of God has faithfully sent monthly member letters with a focus on world events; especially, those which will lead to the return of Jesus Christ, and he stresses that many end-time prophecies are now being fulfilled.

“Cain and Abel – The First Murder” is the latest video published in our Bible Stories series on YouTube.

“Prophetisches Ereignis-OdS,” last Sabbath’s first split sermon in Germany was presented by Robert Muhr and is now posted. Title in English: “Prophetic Event – Place of Safety” (PoS).

“Try Harder,” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Dave Harris, is now posted. Here is the summary:

Is our Christianity a lazy or diligent one? Is there something we should be doing, or are we to just have faith and wait for what comes next?

“Why Do You Believe?” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Eric Rank, is now posted. Here is the summary:

For those whom God calls in this age, He calls them uniquely. At the point of conversion, each one of us confirms our beliefs that set the direction for the rest of our lives. The reasons why we believe in the promise of God must be strong enough to guide us through our life’s journey. Are we working hard enough to strengthen our beliefs to lead us into salvation?

2025 SPRING HOLY DAYS:

Passover: April 12 (observed the evening before)

Days of Unleavened Bread: April 13-19 (first and last days are Holy Days with live Services being broadcast).

On March 8, 2025, Dave Harris will present the sermonette, titled, “Try Harder,” and Eric Rank will present the sermon, titled, “Why Do You Believe?”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

“Going the Distance” is the musical song in the original Rocky movie, and there is quite a lesson to learn from it about determination, endurance and reaching for a goal. The movie and the song are based on an unknown boxer, Rocky Balboa, with aspirations of becoming the boxing champion and what he was willing to put his body through in exercise, diet and determination to reach that goal. Even though he did not gain the title, he showed an inspiring performance of endurance, even when fighting in the ring. 

Our Christian lives are a continual battle to maintain our equilibrium in overcoming Satan and the pulls of the flesh. Thankfully, we have the perfect coach in our corner who gave us the perfect example of overcoming sin, enduring trials and attaining righteousness through obedience.

He never said it would be easy and without trials; but rather, we would be faced with challenges, but He would always be at our side through thick and thin. Hebrews 13:5 tells us:  “Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content with such things as you have. For He Himself has said, ‘I WILL NEVER LEAVE YOU NOR FORSAKE YOU.’”

These are powerful words of great encouragement since at times, when going through severe trials and tests, we may get the feeling of being abandoned but that is just not the case. Christ is full of love, compassion and mercy.Lamentations 3:32 says: “Though He causes grief, Yet He will show compassion According to the multitude of His mercies.”

He went through trials as a human and always looked to God the Father, and He was always in a good attitude, a good example for us to follow since even though we may ask for God’s merciful intervention, it may not always come as fast as we would like, or not come at all at that time since we may have lessons to learn by the trials we face.

What really helps us through these trials which come upon us is to focus on the end goal and make the effort to attain that goal with the same determination as Rocky Balboa did in the movie Rocky, putting himself through sacrifice and physical pain via training hoping to attain the goal he was focused on.

Our hope is in a future resurrection in the Family of God, a goal attainable if we obey and are faithfully following the example of our leader Jesus Christ Who patiently endured the suffering in His life, including death, on our behalf so we could be with Him in the Kingdom. So let’s not let Him down and let us show Him that we are willing to go the distance.

by Norbert Link

In this edition, we are addressing the clash between Trump, Vance and Zelensky, and the consequences for the ongoing alienation between the USA and Europe, as well as Ukraine, Russia and NATO.

Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.

Germany Decides on Full, Unlimited Rearmament!

Financial Times wrote on March 4:

“Chancellor-to-be Friedrich Merz has agreed a deal with his likely coalition partner to inject hundreds of billions in extra funding into Germany’s military and infrastructure, in a ‘fiscal sea change’ designed to revive and re-arm Europe’s largest economy…

“A provision would exempt defence spending above 1 per cent of GDP from the ‘debt brake’ that caps government borrowing, allowing Germany to raise an unlimited amount of debt to fund its armed forces and to provide military assistance to Ukraine…

“Germany’s massive fiscal stimulus has also underlined the sense of urgency in Europe, spurred by US President Donald Trump’s threat to unwind the US guarantees that have long underpinned the continent’s security.

“’This is a fiscal sea change for Germany,’ said Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg. ‘Merz and his coalition-to-be are rising to the occasion’…

“Jana Puglierin, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said: “It is a huge investment in Germany‘s ability to act — and potentially in Europe’s [ability to act] if Germany finds its way back to being a constructive European leader…

“Merz’s deal with the SPD came as the European Commission outlined on Tuesday a joint debt instrument that would enable member states to fund the purchase of military equipment.”

The European military power bloc under Germany’s lead is developing—very rapidly! 

The Clash! 

Piers Morgan wrote that it started with the silly question by Marjorie Tyler Moore’s boyfriend and “conservative commentator” about why Zelensky did not wear a suit, which he indicated was disrespectful. (Elon Musk does not wear one either. Nor did Churchill during war time.) Then Vance jumped in and accused Zelensky of not being grateful to the USA and not having said thank you once (Zelensky thanked the USA at least 33 times in the past. He also started off the meeting with thanking the USA and Donald Trump). Then, Vance talked about diplomacy, and when Zelensky asked what kind of diplomacy, and that a peace deal would have to have security guarantees for Ukraine, Trump lost it. 

Will Trump Withdraw Support? 

Sunday World wrote on March 1: 

“Zelensky had seen the meeting in the Oval Office as an opportunity to convince the United States not to side with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who ordered the invasion of Ukraine three years ago. [The] meeting with Donald Trump ended in disaster on Friday… 

“Trump has lurched toward Russia since taking over as president, shocking traditional allies in Europe and beyond and leaving Ukraine increasingly vulnerable. Friday’s outburst was the most public display of that shift. 

“Vance stressed the need for diplomacy to resolve the biggest conflict in Europe since World War Two, while Zelensky, with his arms folded, countered that Putin could not be trusted in any talks… Zelensky openly challenged Trump over his softer approach toward Putin, urging him to ‘make no compromises with a killer.’… 

“The head of the Ukrainian armed forces, Oleksandr Syrskyi, posted a statement on Telegram affirming that his troops stood by Zelensky and that Ukraine’s strength was in its unity. Anxious Ukrainians following from afar largely rallied around their leader, but fretted about the prospects of continuing flows of U.S. military aid that the country has relied on. 

“In Congress, reaction from Trump’s Republican Party was mixed, while Democrats lambasted his handling of the meeting… 

“The falling out meant that Ukraine and the United States failed to sign a much-vaunted minerals deal that Kyiv hoped would spur Trump to back Ukraine’s war effort, and potentially win support from Republicans in Congress for a new round of aid. The clash also undermined efforts by European leaders to convince Trump to provide security guarantees for Ukraine even if he has refused to deploy U.S. soldiers on Ukrainian soil to maintain peace. Such guarantees are seen as crucial to deter Russia from future aggression. 

“Trump threatened to withdraw U.S. support from Ukraine. ‘You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out, and if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty,’ Trump told Zelensky… 

“Zelensky, who won billions of dollars of U.S. weaponry and moral support from the Biden administration, is facing a sharply different attitude from Trump. Trump wants to quickly wind down the three-year war, improve ties with Russia and recoup money spent to support Ukraine.” 

Reactions to the Trump-Zelensky Clash 

The New York Times wrote on February 28:

“European leaders quickly pledged their continued support for Ukraine on Friday after President Trump’s blistering criticism of Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in a meeting at the White House.

“Leaders lined up behind Ukraine and praised its embattled president, the statements coming one after the other: from France, Germany, Poland, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Norway, Finland, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Slovenia, Belgium, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Ireland. Canadian, Australia and New Zealand…

… many in Europe addressed their statements of encouragement directly to Mr. Zelensky.

“‘Your dignity honors the bravery of the Ukrainian people,’ Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said on social media, referring to Mr. Zelensky. ‘Be strong, be brave, be fearless. You are never alone, dear President.’

“President Emmanuel Macron of France, who had put on a display of friendship with Mr. Trump during a chummy visit to the White House on Monday, said the United States and Europe had been justified in aiding Ukraine and imposing sanctions on Russia after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years…

“Friedrich Merz said in a statement…  addressed to ‘Dear Volodymyr’ that his country would stand behind Ukraine ‘in good and in testing times… We must never confuse aggressor and victim in this terrible war,’ Mr. Merz added, apparently referring to Mr. Trump, who has called Mr. Zelensky a dictator and blamed him for the invasion. The departing German leader, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, said that Ukraine could rely on Germany and the rest of Europe.

“Daniel Fried, a career diplomat under American presidents of both parties who had just returned from a trip to Brussels, said the Oval Office clash had jolted Europe’s capitals, generated a wave of sympathy for Mr. Zelensky and upended a peace process that appeared to be gaining traction. ‘The Europeans are horrified and dismayed,’ Mr. Fried said…

“Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, a center-left leader who carefully avoided any major disagreements with Mr. Trump during a visit to the White House on Thursday, spoke with Mr. Trump and Mr. Zelensky on Friday, according to the prime minister’s office. Mr. Starmer ‘retains his unwavering support for Ukraine and is playing his part to find a path forward to a lasting peace,’ the office said in a statement…

“The Canadian foreign minister, Mélanie Joly, joined the European leaders in offering words of support for Ukraine… On Saturday morning in Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed the messages of support from Europe. Mr. Albanese said his country was proud to help Ukraine  defend itself against ‘the brutality of Russian aggression.’’

The Indiana Express added on February 28:

“Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated support, stating, ‘The Netherlands supports Ukraine as firmly as ever. Now more than ever.’” 

Deutsche Welle added on February 28:

“EU Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas also joined in the support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. ‘We will step up our support to Ukraine so that they can continue to fight back the aggressor,’ she wrote in a post on X. Kallas also stressed that ‘the free world needs a new leader’ and that it’s up to Europe ‘to take this challenge.’”

t-online wrote on February 28:

“A peak of arrogance – Donald Trump and J. D. Vance simply kicked Volodymyr Zelensky out. What a bottomless disgrace… The completely wrong film is being shown in Washington today. Because it is not Zelensky, but Putin who is playing with a third world war. It was not Zelensky, whom Trump has repeatedly insulted as a dictator, who started this murderous war, but Putin…

“It was not the Ukrainian president who behaved disrespectfully towards the USA and its famous Oval Office. First and foremost, it was the American Vice President J. D. Vance and President Donald Trump who not only treated Zelensky disgracefully, but also damaged their own office and America’s reputation. What happened in Washington today is a historic disgrace in America’s often glorious history.”

Die Welt wrote on February 28:

“The scandal in the White House has shown Europe that it can no longer rely on the USA under Donald Trump. Not in the defense of Ukraine, but also not in the defense of the values ​​that make up the free West. 

Bild wrote on February 28:

“It was tragically a historic moment in the Oval Office that will bring joy to the Kremlin. A moment that can change the world. And poses huge problems for Europe and Germany. For Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, it was the best day in a long time.

“What Trump and Vance did there has NOTHING to do with the values ​​of the free West… Trump and Vance… didn’t say a word to Putin. Simply unbelievable. The full escalation is the worst outcome that could have happened.” 

ntv wrote on February 28: 

“Roderich Kiesewetter, CDU foreign policy expert: ‘What Donald Trump’s attack on Selenskyj in the Oval Office shows is that Donald Trump has changed sides… The USA is therefore no longer a partner.” 

Bild wrote on March 1: 

“Rzeczspospolita” (Poland): ‘In American history, no US president has ever treated a foreign head of state, let alone an allied country, in this way. […] This shows where the USA, the leader of the free world for decades, has developed under Trump. […] Zelensky made the emperor naked. He showed who Trump really is.’ 

“The Telegraph (UK): ‘Such a display of aggression by the White House towards a Western-oriented head of state, let alone an ally engaged in an existential military struggle, is unprecedented. Trump and Vance were undoubtedly wrong – factually, geopolitically and morally.’ 

“El País (Spain): ‘The exchange of blows, live and in front of journalists, is the impressive symbol of the end of an era. It is a brutal confirmation of the US’s abrupt change of course, both in content and form, compared to the past 80 years.” 

BBC wrote on March 1: 

“The public breakdown also signals a major crisis looming between European members of Nato and the US. 

“There will be many more doubts and questions about the US commitment to European security outside Ukraine. The biggest is whether President Trump would keep the promise his predecessor Harry Truman made in 1949 to treat an attack on a Nato ally as an attack on America. Those concerns are based on what appears to be Trump’s determination to restore a strong relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

“He has put heavy pressure on Ukraine while offering Putin big concessions – that would have to be made by the Ukrainians. The security of Ukraine is coming a poor second – and Europeans are worrying theirs is too. President Zelensky’s refusal to make those concessions has infuriated Trump… Ukrainians believe they are in a war for national survival – and that Putin would break any promise to end the war if he is not deterred.” 

Trump has said that once a peace deal is made, Putin would stick to it. This is naïve and totally unrealistic. 

Reuters wrote on March 1: 

“NORWEGIAN PRIME MINISTER JONAS GAHR STOERE IN STATEMENT TO TV2: ‘What we saw from the White House today is serious and disheartening. Ukraine still needs the US’s support, and Ukraine’s security and future are also important to the US and to Europe. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has strong support in Ukraine, broad support in Europe, and he has led his people through a very demanding and brutal time, under attack from Russia. 

“‘That Trump accuses Zelenskiy of gambling with World War III is deeply unreasonable and a statement I distance myself from. Norway stands with Ukraine in their struggle for freedom. We hope that the Trump administration also understands the importance of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.’ 

“SWISS PRESIDENT KARIN KELLER-SUTTER ON X: ‘Switzerland remains firmly committed to supporting a just and lasting peace, while condemning Russia’s aggression against a sovereign state.’ 

“JOHANN WADEPHUL, DEPUTY OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY-GROUP IN GERMAN PARLIAMENT, THE PARTY OF INCOMING CHANCELLOR FRIEDRICH MERZ, ON X: ‘The scenes from the White House are shocking. How can you stab the president of an invaded country in the back like this? Free Europe will not betray Ukraine!’”

Focus wrote on March 2: 

“After the heated argument in the White House between the USA and Ukraine, the former chairman of the Munich Security Conference, Christoph Heusgen, is counting on a significant strengthening of Europe… Now is Europe’s hour… 

“The former Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel… criticized… the US government’s attitude towards Europe and its role in security policy. ‘After more than 80 years, this American government has made the decision… no longer to be a partner for Europe’… ‘For Trump, Europe is no longer a strategic partner, but just a burden… I am sure that he wants to weaken or even destroy Europe, because we are actually quite big.’… 

“Gabriel expressed concern that Trump’s strategy ultimately plays into Vladimir Putin’s hands. ‘For the US President, peace seems to mean leaving Ukraine to Vladimir Putin. And to replace the strength of the law with the right of the strongest…’ This is a wake-up call for Europe. ‘Many Europeans would like to see a Germany finally return to the political stage that is prepared to take the lead together with others,’ said Gabriel.”

Europe in Support of Zelensky… Facing US Challenges 

Deutsche Welle wrote on March 2: 

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has joined leaders from the UK, Germany, France and others after a public showdown with Trump sent shockwaves… The London conference opened with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer giving an address… where dozens of world leaders have gathered to discuss Ukraine’s and Europe’s future, especially in the shadow of an increasingly antagonistic administration in the US. ‘We gather here today because this is a once-in-a-generation moment for the security of Europe and we all need to step up,’ Starmer said. He said the leaders will discuss a plan on how to end the war with Ukraine before presenting it to the US… In addition to prime ministers and heads of European states, the guests include Canada’s outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen… 

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov emphasized his country’s opposition to deploying European peacekeepers to Ukraine… He also praised US President Donald Trump for wanting to end the war, accusing Europe of seeking to continue the conflict… Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stressed that Europe must believe in its power… ‘Europe has an advantage over everyone here,’ Tusk said, adding that with some 2.6 million professional soldiers, Europe has more troops than the US, China or Russia. He also stressed the continent’s combat aircraft and artillery strength. ‘Today in Europe there is a deficit of imagination and courage,’ he said. ‘Europe must understand its strength.’… 

“Alexseev, a professor of political science at San Diego State University,… discussed the pressure European leaders face… ‘Well, I hope that they [European leaders] realize that we’re witnessing a major shift in global politics, that the discussion in the Oval Office was not just a spat between two leaders. It signaled a major realignment of the United States away from Europe, and we can no longer take for granted US security guarantees probably not just for Ukraine, but for NATO as well.’ Alexseev said that since Trump came to office, the US ‘has offered major concessions to Russia but put all the pressure on Ukraine.’ 

“The political science professor argued that Trump was trying to appease Russian President Vladimir Putin, rather than his stated aim of reaching peace [and] that ‘the primary goal for Trump is to rehabilitate Putin and to open the door for lucrative deals with Russia, which right now maybe seem to be hampered by the fact that Russia is under sanctions because it launched this brutal all-out war against Ukraine.’… 

“The officer in charge of Germany’s Field Army, Lieutenant General Harald Gante, said the country needs to reintroduce conscription to meet its defense needs. He told the German news agency dpa that the Bundeswehr cannot rely solely on volunteers… The Bundeswehr is awaiting the government’s decision on reintroducing military service, which was suspended in 2011…” 

Leaving NATO and the UN? 

The New York Post wrote on March 2: 

“Elon Musk backed calls for the US to withdraw from NATO and the United Nations after months of badmouthing the two international organizations. ‘I agree,’ Musk, 53, wrote on X in reply late Saturday to MAGA influencer Gunther Eagleman’s suggestion that ‘It’s time to leave NATO and the UN.’ 

“Musk did not elaborate on the specifics of why he wants the US to pull out of NATO and the UN, but the suggestion came after several social media users pointed to Sen. Mike Lee’s (R-Utah) call to pull out of both. Last month, Lee, 53, who has drawn frequent reposts and interactions from Musk on X, introduced legislation alongside other lawmakers to pull out of the UN and decried it as ‘a platform for tyrants and a venue to attack America and her allies.’ On Saturday, Lee publicly suggested that the US pull out of NATO, pointing to Norwegian fuel supplier Haltbakk Bunkers’ announcement that it would stop helping the US Navy refuel in protest of President Trump’s confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. ‘Europe doesn’t love us,’ Lee chided on X Saturday. ‘Let’s leave NATO.’… 

“Musk is known to have Trump’s ear, serving as a ‘special employee’ at the White House and informal boss of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)… While Musk didn’t delve into his rationale on Saturday, in the past, Musk has argued that the US makes up a disproportionate amount of NATO’s power and has questioned why NATO continued to exist after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Musk has also previously asserted that the US spends too much money on the UN… 

“Trump has publicly demanded NATO allies spend vastly more on defense and accused European nations of taking advantage of America’s military umbrella. Last month, he also cut off funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council.” 

These comments are interesting in light of the following article. 

Tariffs for Europe 

Newsmax wrote on February 26: 

“President Donald Trump said Wednesday during his first Cabinet meeting that the European Union was formed to take advantage of the United States and that his administration soon will be announcing tariffs of 25% on the 27-nation bloc… 

“‘the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States. I mean, look, let’s be honest, the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States. That’s the purpose of it. And they’ve done a good job of it. But now I’m president.’”

China Ready for “War”!

BBC reported on March 5:

“China has warned the US it is ready to fight ‘any type’ of war after hitting back against President Donald Trump’s mounting trade tariffs.

“The world’s top two economies have edged closer to a trade war after Trump slapped more tariffs on all Chinese goods. China quickly retaliated imposing 10-15% tariffs on US farm products.

“’If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we’re ready to fight till the end,’ China’s embassy said on X, reposting a line from a government statement on Tuesday.

“It is some of the strongest rhetoric so far from China since Trump became president and comes as leaders gathered in Beijing for the annual National People’s Congress.”

Trump’s Big Speech

BBC wrote on March 5:

“US President Donald Trump declared “the American Dream is unstoppable’ as he addressed a raucous joint session of Congress for the first time since he returned to power.

“In the longest presidential speech to lawmakers on record, he outlined his vision for his second term, as Republicans applauded a high-octane six weeks that has reshaped domestic and foreign policy.

“Trump was heckled by Democrats and he goaded them in turn during the rowdy primetime address, during which he said his administration was “just getting started”.

“The Republican president has moved to slash the federal workforce and crack down on immigration, while imposing tariffs on the US’s biggest trading partners and shaking up the transatlantic alliance over the war in Ukraine. 

Sadly, President Trump’s vision for America is not the same as prophetic scriptures in the Bible so clearly warn. 

Trump’s Surreal AI-Generated Video Depicts Gaza As A Luxury Resort Destination 

Forbes wrote on February 26: 

“President Donald Trump has shared an AI-generated video showing a transformed Gaza Strip featuring golden Trump statues, luxury beachfront developments and bearded belly dancers… The AI-generated clip… begins with scenes of destruction before transitioning to a reimagined Gaza featuring Dubai-style skyscrapers, luxury hotels and pristine beaches, before numerous surreal elements are portrayed. These include a towering golden statue of Trump, children carrying golden Trump balloons, buildings emblazoned with ‘Trump Gaza,’ and Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lounging poolside with cocktails. 

“Elon Musk… also appears several times in the video, eating on a beach and throwing dollar bills into the air as apparent Tesla vehicles drive through the streets. Throughout the video, a song plays with the lyrics: ‘Donald’s coming to set you free, bringing the light for all to see, no more tunnels, no more fear, Trump Gaza’s finally here. Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future a brand new light. Feast and dance the deal is done, Trump Gaza number one.’… 

“The video release follows Trump’s Febr. 4 announcement of a controversial plan for Gaza, where he stated that ‘The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it, too. We’ll own it.’ Trump described his vision as turning Gaza into ‘the Riviera of the Middle East’ and his plan would reportedly involve relocating Gaza’s approximately 2 million Palestinian residents to neighboring countries…

“The surreal video has garnered widespread criticism, with even Truth Social users responding with mixed reactions. Direct quotes from commenters include: ‘I hate this. I love our president, but this is horrible,’ and ‘I don’t think that’s funny or cool. Sorry. Am I missing something??? I hope it’s a joke, a bad joke.’ Another user commented: ‘You’re doing great Mr President. But don’t let it get to your head. God put you in that position for His Glory, not yours.” 

The golden statue of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 3 comes to mind. 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

These are very interesting questions and the only place that we can find this information is in the Word of God, the Bible.

The spiritual realm is a fascinating subject.   Physical can’t see spirit.  Our physical life now, however long or short, will be a fraction of our life as a Spirit-born member of God’s Family if we make it into the Kingdom of God.

In an article entitled “What Science Can’t Discover About the Human Mind”, Mr Herbert W Armstrong (1892-1986), former leader of the now defunct Worldwide Church of God, wrote that “God has had to plan to bridge the gap between MATTER (of which MAN is now wholly composed) and SPIRIT (which God now is, and man must become).   The body that comes in the (first) resurrection is not the same body that was flesh and blood in this human lifetime. God does not turn flesh and blood matter INTO Spirit. The flesh and blood physical body, after death, decomposes and decays, but the spirit that was IN that body, like the sculptor’s mold, preserves all the form and shape, the memory, and the character INTACT. And that mold, being spirit does not change — even though the resurrection may take place thousands of years after death.”

 

In his book “Beyond the Cosmos,” author Hugh Ross states on page 15 that “Since birth we have lived in the four dimensions of length, width, height and time.   We will continue to reside there until the day of our physical death.”  On page 19, we read: “With the help of supercomputers, mathematicians have designed realms with as many as a million dimensions of space.  On page 20, we further read: “Physicists have just uncovered strong evidence that extra dimensions do indeed exist.  Yet predating these physics discoveries by more than nineteen hundred years are the words of the prophets and apostles who penned the sixty-six books of the Bible.  These ancients described phenomena – such as the creation event, miracles, [and] Jesus’ post-resurrection capacities…  – that require the existence of extra dimensions or the functional equivalent of extra dimensions.”  

We quote these comments to show how incredible the future will be when the physical will be but a fleeting moment of history and everything will then become spiritual.   As Spirit beings, the people of God will understand all of this information, and much more as the sons and daughters of God.

Therefore, we will have a look at the spiritual world now and see how magnificent it is.   This should encourage and motivate us about the future that is set before us and show us how much greater it will be than that which we enjoy today, and much greater than we can understand at this time.   It is exciting to think about all of this and to pray for God’s Kingdom to come – and soon!

There are three heavens and we have written before, for instance in our Q&A https://www.eternalgod.org/q-a-3756/, about these as follows:

“The Bible does indeed reveal the existence of ‘three’ heavens. While the first two heavens are ‘physical’ in nature, the third heaven is composed of spirit — it is referred to in Scripture as God’s dwelling place.

“The atmosphere or the ‘first heaven’ — the air that surrounds the earth — refers to the space where the birds fly, the clouds and the wind roam, and from which the dew comes. We read in Genesis 1:20: ‘…let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.’ We also read, in Genesis 27:28, that God promises to give ‘the dew of heaven.’ Finally, we are told in Deuteronomy 33:28, that Jacob’s ‘Heavens shall also drop dew.’

“The physical universe, which is beyond this earth’s atmosphere, can be described as the ‘second heaven.’ It represents the space where we find the sun, the moon, the stars, and all the other planets that God has created. We read, in Genesis 1:14-17, that God referred to sun and moon as ‘lights in the firmament of the heavens’ (verses 14, 15), and that He ‘set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth’ (verse 17). David pondered, in Psalm 8:3, over God’s ‘heavens, the work of Your fingers,’ and he especially continued to talk about ‘the moon and the stars, which You have ordained.’

“In addition to these two physical ‘heavens,’ we find that the Bible speaks about another heaven, a heaven composed of spirit — the third heaven, where God lives. No human being has ever ascended to this heaven (compare John 3:13) — the only one who went to this heaven after His resurrection was Jesus Christ. We are specifically told that David did not ascend to heaven (Acts 2:34).’”

So, let us now look at the Heaven of God’s Throne and so much more.  We will explore WHERE it is, WHO and WHO IS NOT in heaven, WHAT is in heaven.

One commentator opined that “I believe that heaven cannot thoroughly be explained, even by the Scriptures, for it must be too wonderful for words and it must be too indescribable to relate to by word pictures.”   It would be difficult to disagree with that assertion!

So, where is the Heaven of God’s Throne?    

In Isaiah 14:13, we read about Lucifer’s attempted coup d’etat, the most audacious but ridiculous attempt at a take-over bid in the history of the universe!  But this verse does reveal a geographical location of the third heaven: “For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north” (Authorized Version).

This reveals that it is in the north of the earth and the word ascend means to go or move upward, to rise.   This is confirmed when we read that Jesus came down from heaven (cp John 3:13 and many other verses particularly in John 6 which are quoted further on in this Q&A.  Therefore, it must be in the north.

There are many verses in the Bible where heaven is shown as in the north. Psalm 75:6-7 (Authorized Version) states: “For promotion cometh neither from the east, nor from the west, nor from the south. But God is the judge: he putteth down one, and setteth up another.” Promotion or “exaltation” comes from the north, where God’s throne is. 

The Bible does not give other information about this location, geographically, but the location is immaterial anyway because, as it is spiritual, it can’t be seen by man.

Let us look WHO and WHO is not in heaven.

It is interesting to read about those spiritual beings who inhabit that wonderful spiritual place.

Wikipedia gives the following insight into the 3^rd heaven: “A third concept of Heaven, also called shămei hashamayim (שׁמי השׁמים or ‘Heaven of Heavens’), is mentioned in such passages as Genesis 28:12, Deuteronomy 10:14 and 1 Kings 8:27 as a distinctly spiritual realm containing (or being traveled by) angels and God.”

We know, of course, that God the Father and Jesus Christ are in heaven.   Let us review just a few of so many verses in the Bible that refer to this.

Psalm 11:4: “The LORD is in His holy temple; the LORD’s throne is in heaven; His eyes behold, His eyelids test the sons of men.”

Psalm 115:3: “But our God is in heaven; He does whatever He pleases.”

Isaiah 66:1: “Thus says the LORD, Heaven is My throne and the earth is My footstool. Where then is a house you could build for Me? And where is a place that I may rest?”

In the model prayer given by Jesus as recorded in Matthew 6:9, Jesus opens with the phrase “Our Father in heaven.”

In John 3:12, we read: “If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?” Jesus knew about heavenly things because He had come down from there.

In John 6, Jesus refers to Himself as the bread which came down from heaven (see verses 33, 41, 48, 50, 51, 58).

Hebrews 8:1: “Now the main point in what has been said is this: we have such a high priest, who has taken His seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens,”

Mark 16:19: “So then the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God.”

Revelation 3:21: “The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne.”

 And then there are the angelic beings.   

On page 3 of our booklet “Angels, Demons and the Spirit World,” the question is asked: “How Many Angels Exist?” and the answer reads as follows:

“Man has no comprehension of how many angels exist. The revealed number is indeed mind-boggling. In Revelation 5:11, the number of angels that had assembled before the throne of God is given as ‘…ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands.’ Hebrews 12:22 goes even further: ‘But you have come to… an innumerable company of angels.’ The Greek word for ‘innumerable’ is ‘anarithmethos,’ literally meaning, ‘unnumbered’ or ‘without number.’ Certainly, God knows how many angels He created but for man, angels are ‘without number.’”

Let us, from the same booklet on page 4, read about them having their own names:

“As individual beings with feelings and emotions, and with their own language, God also knows them by individual names. The Bible reveals two angelic names to us—Michael and Gabriel. It also talks about a third angel—Lucifer—who became Satan the devil. It appears, however, that all of the other angels have God-given names too. In Hebrews 1:4, we are told that Christ ‘…obtained a more excellent name than they,’ and Ephesians 1:21, in comparing Christ with the angelic world, states that Christ was seated at the right hand of God the Father, …far above…every name that is named.’ (Compare, too, Philippians 2:9.)”

Then on page 7, we read about the different orders of angels:

“There seem to exist different orders, categories or ranks of angels, with varying degrees of power and authority. When describing the angelic world, Colossians 1:16 speaks about ‘…thrones or dominions or principalities or powers.’ Ephesians 1:20–21 refers to angels as ‘…principality and power and might and dominion.’ In Ephesians 3:10, angels are identified as ‘…principalities and powers in the heavenly places,’ and 1 Peter 3:22 describes the created world of spirit beings as ‘…angels and authorities and powers.’

“In light of these Scriptures, the Swiss Zürcher Bible does refer to ranks among the angels. The Ryrie Study Bible states in an annotation to Ephesians 1:21: ‘These words (i.e., principality, and power, and might, and dominion) in rabbinical thought of the time, described different orders of angels.’

“As will become clearer in the remainder of this booklet, angels have been given varying degrees of power and glory. All of them are powerful and glorious, but not to the same extent. Revelation 5:2 speaks about a ‘strong angel.’ Revelation 10:1 and 18:21 describe ‘mighty’ angels. Revelation 18:1 introduces an angel ‘…coming down from heaven, having great authority, and the earth was illuminated with his glory.’  Other Scriptures imply that specific angels were given special powers over fire (Revelation 14:18) and water (Revelation 16:5).

“The following brief overview will summarize the varying orders or categories of angels, as revealed in Scripture.”

We then read about them on pages 6-10:

• Archangels
• Seraphim
• Cherubim
• Four Living Creatures
• The twenty-four Elders
• The seven Spirits of God
• The Remaining Angels 

In heaven, there are God the Father, Jesus Christ the Word, and innumerable angels.   

(To be continued)

Lead Writer: Brian Gale (United Kingdom)

compiled by Dave Harris

A Tech Team Meeting was conducted on March 2, 2025. Hosted by Eric Rank, we reviewed our advertising results, video presentations, website status along with some miscellaneous topics.

“Cain and Abel – The First Murder” is the latest video published in our Bible Stories series on YouTube.

“Das korrupte wirtschaftliche System Europas” is the title of this Sabbath’s German sermon, presented by Evangelist Norbert Link.  Title in English: “The Corrupt Economic System of Europe.”

“Wie uns das Lob näher zu Gott bringt,” last Sabbath’s first split sermon in Germany was presented by Marc Völler. Title in English: “How Praise Brings Us Closer to God.”

“Wo ist sein Hut?” last Sabbath’s second split sermon in Germany was presented by Johann Schell. Title in English: “Where Is His Hat?”

“In All Honesty,” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Michael Link, is now posted. Here is the summary:

The term “in all honesty” is frequently used to emphasize truthfulness and sincerity in an attempt to soften the impact by diminishing the harshness and not trying to be malicious. However, we shouldn’t use this term loosely; we should be honest at all times. There is also a fine line between an honest mistake and a blatant mistake, and when we do make a mistake, how can we rectify it?

“Europe’s Corrupt Economic System,” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Norbert Link, is now posted. Here is the summary:

In the book of Revelation, ungodly modern Babylon is described not only as a European political, military and religious system, but also as an economic power. Other passages in the Old Testament give us further information about this worldwide economic system in which true Christians must have no part.

2025 SPRING HOLY DAYS:

Passover: April 12 (observed the evening before)

Days of Unleavened Bread: April 13-19 (first and last days are Holy Days with live Services being broadcasted).

On March 1, 2025, Michael Link will present the sermonette, titled, “In All Honesty,“ and Norbert Link will present the sermon, titled, “Europe’s Corrupt Economic System.”

The live services are available, over video and audio, at http://eternalgod.org/live-services/ (12:30 pm Pacific Time; 1:30 pm Mountain Time; 2:30 pm Central Time; 3:30 pm Eastern Time; 8:30 pm Greenwich Mean Time; 9:30 pm Central European Time). Just click on Connect to Live Stream.

Vice President JD Vance recently said in Germany: “We have a new sheriff in town,” referring to President Donald Trump in Washington. But is there also now a new sheriff in Berlin? Some might think so.

I’m talking about Friedrich Merz (CDU) who is to become the new German Chancellor, replacing the deeply unsuccessful Olaf Scholz (SPD). Trump congratulated Merz, and so did many other leaders. Trump also congratulated the AfD, as some other populist leaders on the right did as well. In Germany’s election last Sunday, the AfD reached a strong second place [one of five Germans voted for it], so that the CDU and the AfD would hold enough seats for a majority in Parliament. But Merz said he would not enter into a coalition with the “far-right” AfD.

Meaning, “the legacy globalist-right conservative Christian Democrats” would have to enter into a “grand” coalition with the left-leaning SPD to be able to rule Germany… the same SPD which under Scholz has been largely responsible for the terrible demise Germany is in.

In an insightful article following the election, Breitbart wrote on February 24:

“But as Germany experienced in the Angela Merkel era of such grand coalitions between left and right, ultimately, the government is dragged left — very left — as the junior partners hold the senior hostage with the threat that they can, at any moment, collapse the government if not indulged…”

So will Merz, in time, stick to or abandon his pledge to uphold the “firewall” or “Brandmauer” against the AfD? The AfD is open to a coalition with the CDU. In fact, the AfD stated in the past that Merz is even more right-wing than they are. They also state now that the CDU has effectively adopted most of the AfD’s manifesto in order to attract voters who might otherwise have voted for the AfD. Merz, it is stated, thereby shifted his party to the right, abandoning Angela Merkel’s politics.

Merz’s victory has been described as “one of the most remarkable comebacks in recent political history,” and Merz was referred to as “a corporate king in conservative clothing.” It has been known that Merz has long represented the interests of some of the world’s most powerful corporate and financial elites, most notably BlackRock in Germany until 2020. Germany will become the first country to be ruled by a former BlackRock official. BlackRock profits from sectors including pharmaceuticals, entertainment, media and, of course, war. BlackRock is the biggest asset management corporation in the world, which controls some $6.3 trillion in assets — twice Germany’s gross domestic product. 

As first and foremost a businessman, Merz’s victory, we are told, will be celebrated in the boardrooms of BlackRock and other major corporations, granting them unprecedented control of Europe’s largest economy.

What political views does Merz have? Actually, this is very difficult to decipher. During a debate shortly before the election, Merz asked rhetorically whether people would continue to talk about NATO in its “current form” rather than about establishing an “independent European defense capability.”

Merz has been described as anti-American and anti-Trump. He said: “The EU must not come to Washington as a dwarf — because then it will be treated as one.” He also noted that America’s intervention in German elections was as brazen as Russia’s intervention. He sharply criticized Donald Trump’s administration and urged Europe to distance itself from Washington during a post-election panel.

But is this an accurate picture which really describes Merz’s position? It has been suggested that any disagreements in public would largely be a façade, as Trump’s and Merz’s interests and visions are allegedly similar. Merz aligned with the US on issues such as the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, calling for the project’s cancellation long before the escalation of the Ukraine crisis. There may be disagreements as to how to deal with Russia and Ukraine… but we know from prophecy that both countries will unite in the end. Trump and Merz want Europe to spend more—a lot more—on defense, and both support the global “corporate elite.”

From a philosophical standpoint, Merz and the AfD are much more similar than Merz and the SPD. Will the push of the SPD in a grand coalition become so unbearable that the Germans will demand a dramatic change… which will ultimately end up in a coalition between the two right-wing parties?

Merz also made clear that he wants to become the conservative leader of Europe—thereby challenging Merkel’s protégée, Ursula von der Leyen. Will America’s withdrawal from European affairs give Germany, perhaps under Merz, the opportunity to become much more influential in Europe? Is Merz going to be used as an architect in that regard to allow end-time prophecy to develop in due course?

We will have to see how all of this will play out.

by Norbert Link

In this issue, we address the ongoing and ever-increasing national and international uproar over Donald Trump’s “unwise” statements pertaining to Ukraine and his actions towards Zelensky and Russia; address developments in Brazil and Gaza; and report about long-overdue actions by RFK on vaccinations.

We dedicate a large portion of this issue to the election in Germany and introduce to you Friedrich Merz, presumably the next German Chancellor, addressing his past and his plans for the future. We also predict, however, that the new German government under Merz may just be a continuation of the past and still present disastrous government under Scholz.

Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Is Germany Now on the Brink of Change?”   

Throughout this section, we have underlined pertinent statements in the quoted articles, for the convenience and quick overview of the reader.

Boris Johnson vs. Trump 

Daily Mail published the following article by Boris Johnson on February 21: 

“They know full well that saying Ukraine ‘started the war’ is like blaming the defenceless young woman at the beginning of the movie Jaws and claiming that she takes off her clothes and skips into the moonlit sea with the specific intention of attacking the great white shark. It’s like saying that American ships brutally fired on Japanese Zeroes at Pearl Harbor. It’s Orwellian, bonkers, an inversion of the truth, and they know it. It’s victim-blaming rubbish to say that Ukraine was in any way responsible for the three years of carnage, and it is also rubbish to say that Vladimir Putin was ‘provoked’ by Nato…

 “Putin launched his war not because he was worried about Nato – that’s pure Kremlin propaganda – but because he is a ruthless opportunist, who had been in power for two decades, and who thought he could revive his political fortunes with a short, sharp war to rebuild the Russian empire.  He thought that the Ukrainians would rapidly surrender, and that the West would spinelessly acquiesce, as we had during the annexation of Crimea in 2014.

 “… everybody can see that Volodymyr Zelensky is not a dictator but a democrat courageously defending his country against an aggressor… we need to remember whose side the Ukrainians are on. They are on our side. They are on the side of freedom… In this war there is not a shred of moral equivalence between Ukraine and Russia…’

 Trump needs to be careful that he is not losing the support of his closest allies.

 Words of War Intensify

 The Daily Mail wrote on February 21: 

“Trump has claimed Sir Keir Starmer [and Emmanuel Macron]  ‘didn’t do anything’ to end the Ukraine war. The US President lashed out at Sir Keir and … Emmanuel Macron amid a transatlantic spat over Mr Trump branding Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky a ‘dictator’. Those comments riled both the PM and French President, who hit back at Mr Trump’s attack on the Ukrainian President and doubled down on their support for Kyiv… This comes after Mr Trump said in an interview with Fox News he didn’t think it was ‘very important’ for Zelensky to be involved in peace talks as ‘he’s been there for three years’ and that he ‘makes it very hard to make deals’… he suggested the Russian President ‘doesn’t have to make a deal’ because he could complete a total invasion of Ukraine ‘if he wanted’… 

“In his radio interview, Mr Trump also appeared to move away from his previous astonishing remarks in which he falsely blamed Kyiv for having ‘started’ the conflict. ‘Russia attacked, but there was no reason for them to attack.’ Mr Trump said… Billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk, an ally of Mr Trump, yesterday joined attacks on Mr Zelensky by claiming he runs a ‘fraud machine feeding off dead bodies of soldiers.’ [He also called him a “despised dictator.”] 

“But Keith Kellogg, the US President’s envoy to Russia and Ukraine, struck a different tone today following a trip to Kyiv. In a post on Mr Musk’s social media site X, the retired lieutenant general said he had had a ‘long and intense day with the senior leadership of Ukraine’. This included ‘extensive and positive discussions’ with Mr Zelensky, who he praised as ‘the embattled and courageous leader of a nation at war.”’ 

What is really going on behind the scenes? 

Very Personal 

The Sun in the UK wrote on February 21: 

“As negotiations have continued over finding a peace deal in Ukraine, the relationship between the two have only worsened. Their personal spats have spilled over into the public eye in recent weeks. 

“Zelensky has even been urged to flee Ukraine ‘immediately’ amid escalating tensions between Washington and Kyiv, insiders in the White House warned… 

“Asked about the growing tensions between the US and Kyiv, another source close to the White House said the public spat was a long-time coming… Trump’s smearing of the Ukraine regime as scam artists who provoked a war using US taxpayers’ money is a rant beneath the dignity of his office. Almost nothing in it is true… 

“It is an unprecedentedly shocking statement from the President of the United States… It is troubling and short-sighted in the extreme for the so-called leader of the free world to have no interest in a war ­raging in Europe because he is separated from it by the Atlantic. America is not a business…  is the most powerful democracy on Earth with global responsibilities and — let’s be frank — a duty to discern right from wrong with absolute moral clarity.” 

Even the pro-Trump media and pro-Trump commentators are standing up to Trump. 

Mark Levin Defies Trump 

Mediaite wrote on February 20: 

“Fox News’ Mark Levin delivered an implicit rebuke of President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about the ongoing war between Russian and Ukraine on Wednesday, debunking a series of false and misleading claims made by the president. On his radio show, Levin delivered a history lesson on Russian dictator Vladimir Putin’s rise to power and various crimes, while going to bat for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky… 

“‘Now look, I don’t have a problem if it’s the position of our administration to cut back on support for Ukraine — which I oppose, by the way — then so be it. Elections have consequences, so be it. But I want to make sure the facts are on the table and you, the American people, draw your own conclusion,’ began Levin, submitting that ‘MAGA doesn’t support Putin.’ ‘Zelensky ordered martial law — that’s what the constitution there compelled. Zelensky hasn’t called for an election — that’s what the constitution there compels. he continued. ‘Now, I’m waiting for the first free election for Vladimir Putin. I mean, this is almost comical in a sick way that Putin is demanding an election. Why is he demanding an election in Ukraine when he doesn’t have free and real elections in his own country? And why does he-, why does he get to call the shots when in fact, he murders people who dare to challenge him?’… 

“‘Zelensky’s latest poll, he’s at 57%,’ noted the conservative commentator just one day after Trump claimed that Zelensky’s approval rating sat at 4%. ‘The parliament — with all parties in the parliament — support what he’s doing. They’re trying to survive. Ukraine did not invade Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine… Eighty-one percent of the American people do not trust Putin because 81% of the American people are smart,’ continued Levin… 

“Trump’s comments have been criticized a wide range of voices, including many on the right. But Levin’s remarks are particularly notable given his long history of supporting the president…” 

The New York Post Draws the Line 

Mediaite wrote on February 21:

“The New York Post pushed back on President Donald Trump’s quip that Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is a ‘dictator’ with a full front cover image of Russian President Vladimir Putin and an all-caps headline declaring: “THIS IS A DICTATOR.”… The Post… a conservative powerhouse and Trump-ally Rupert Murdoch’s flagship newspaper, has drawn a sharp line in the sand over Ukraine… The cover was praised by other Trump-supporting media personalities who have taken issue with the Ukraine pivot, like journalist Piers Morgan… 

“The move follows a week of criticism from The Post’s editorial board itself, taking direct aim on Trump comments beginning Wednesday… ‘Whatever negotiating tactics Trump cares to use, turning the truth completely upside down ought to be beneath him.’”

No Minerals Deal… USA Blames Zelensky 

The Sun wrote on February 22: 

“Zelensky is reportedly not ready to accept the ‘problematic’ offer from the US. The [minerals] deal proposed by Trump’s team would see Kyiv hand over billions of dollars of minerals to Washington DC in exchange for weapons… And it comes as the split between the US and Ukraine is widening, with some White House officials raging Zelensky would be ‘six feet under’ without them… 

“Kyiv officials are however standing firm, reports Sky News, with some sources saying US and Ukrainian officials had spent ‘all night’ negotiating on Thursday into the early hours of Friday. A source said: ‘The agreement is not yet ready to be signed, there are a number of problematic issues, and in the current form of the draft, the president is not ready to accept it. Today, the drafts do not reflect a partnership in the agreement and contain only unilateral commitments by Ukraine.’ 

“The White House view is that Zelensky grew too accustomed to unwavering support under former President Joe Biden, including billions in military aid and NATO backing. Now, Trump’s inner circle believes the Ukrainian leader has overstepped, reports Axios. ‘We created a monster with Zelensky,’ another administration official said. ‘And these Trump-deranged Europeans who won’t send troops are giving him terrible advice.’… 

“‘In the course of a week, Zelensky rebuffed President Trump’s treasury secretary, his secretary of state and his vice president, all before moving on to personally insulting President Trump in the press,’ one official said. The US President also blasted Zelensky’s wartime leadership, calling him a ‘modestly successful comedian’ who must ‘move fast or he is not going to have a country left.’

“Russian President… Putin wasted no time seizing on the growing US-Ukraine rift, praising Trump for ‘changing his position’…”

Trying to appease Putin would be a colossal mistake. 

No Guarantees for Ukraine

The Daily Mail added on February 22:

“Ukraine claims to have Europe’s largest reserves of titanium – used to produce alloys for aircraft and naval vessels, and lithium, a commodity that is becoming increasingly valuable amid global demand for batteries – particularly in electric vehicles. The war-torn country also has deposits of rare earth minerals that are essential in high-tech industries, including defense and clean energy. The minerals are especially valuable to the US amid growing tensions with China, which controls vast portions of the global supply. 

“Zelensky furiously lashed out at the initial proposal, claiming that it was too vague and demanded a 50 percent share of Ukraine’s mineral deposits. He said that Trump was demanding $500 billion worth of the minerals – which was far beyond America’s total contribution to the Ukraine war effort of $100 billion. … Ukraine has trillions of dollars worth of natural resources… though many are found in the industrial heartlands in the east, currently occupied by Russia… Zelensky told reporters later Monday that any US-Ukraine economic treaty must see security guarantees… adding that his country was not just a ‘simple supplier of raw materials’… 

“An analysis of the contract’s terms by the Telegraph concluded that, if the terms of the draft dated February 7, 2025 draft were accepted by Ukraine, Trump’s demands would amount to a higher share of Ukrainian GDP than reparations imposed on Germany following World War I…

“Reuters also reported that American negotiators said they may cut Kyiv’s access to Elon Musk’s Starlink, which has been heavily relied on for civilian and military use, if it did not agree to the mineral rights deal… ‘Ukraine runs on Starlink. They consider it their North Star,’ said the source. ‘Losing Starlink … would be a massive blow.’…”

Ukraine Agrees to Mineral Deal… Sort of…

The Financial Times wrote on February 25:

“Ukrainian officials say Kyiv is now ready to sign the agreement on jointly developing its mineral resources, including oil and gas, after the US dropped demands for a right to $500bn in potential revenue from exploiting the resources.

“Although the text lacks explicit security guarantees, the officials argued that they had negotiated far more favourable terms and depicted the deal as a way of broadening the relationship with the US to shore up Ukraine’s prospects after three years of war…

“The final version of the agreement, dated February 24 and seen by the FT, would establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 per cent of proceeds from the ‘future monetisation’ of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics. The fund would invest in projects in Ukraine….

“However, the agreement omits any reference to US security guarantees which Kyiv had originally insisted on in return for agreeing to the deal. It also leaves crucial questions such as the size of the US stake in the fund and the terms of “joint ownership” deals to be hashed out in follow-up agreements.

“Ukrainian officials said the deal had been approved by the justice, economy and foreign ministers, and held out the prospect of Zelenskyy travelling to the White House… for a signing ceremony with Trump…”

We will wait and see what is coming out of that one…

USA Declines to Sponsor UN Resolution

Newsweek wrote on February 20:

“The United States is declining to co-sponsor a draft [UN] resolution… [which] reaffirms the need for full implementation of past U.N. resolutions, particularly the demand for Russia to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its military forces from Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory. Russia currently controls about 20 percent of Ukraine and continues to gain ground in the east.”

The USA submitted their own version, greatly exonerating Putin. It does not refer to Putin as an “aggressor,” and it does not demand Russia to withdraw from Ukrainian territory nor does it establish Ukraine’s independent sovereignty. This version will have no chance of acceptance. The irony is that we know from the Bible that ultimately, Russia and Ukraine will unite.

Trump’s Attacks on Ukraine So Wrong!

Die Welt wrote on February 23:

“On Monday it will be three years since Russia unleashed a war.

“Donald Trump’s attacks on Ukraine and its president are so wrong that from now on we have to reckon with everything. And they lead to historical comparisons that hurt.”

RFK Issues Two Bombshell Orders on Vaccines 

Daily Mail wrote on February 21: 

“Robert F Kennedy Jr has pulled promotional ads for vaccines and postponed a meeting of key vaccine advisors, in one of his first moves as health secretary.

“Kennedy ordered the CDC to scrub its digital ‘Wild to Mild’ flu vaccine campaign that juxtaposed a lion next to a kitten as an analogy for how the shot ‘tames’ the virus. But Kennedy wants the CDC to move away from nudge tactics and focus its vaccine communications on ‘informed consent’ – which involves telling the patient the medical risks and benefits and letting them come to their own decision.

“Meanwhile, the year’s first meeting of the CDC’s influential panel of vaccine experts has been delayed indefinitely, marking the first time the meeting has been postponed in over 40 years, except for during the emergency Covid pandemic… Mr Kennedy told HHS staff that ‘nothing is off limits’ when it comes to pinpointing the leading causes of chronic illnesses in children, including alterations to national vaccine recommendations.”

This is a good start. Hopefully, it will continue at full speed. 

Another Trump “Plan” to Deal With Immigrants

Newsmax wrote on February 25:

“Illegal immigrants in the U.S., including children 14 and older, will be required to submit personal information, such as fingerprints and home addresses, to a registry under a plan being considered by the Trump administration… Previously, illegal immigrants were committing a civil offense and could be detained and deported but weren’t considered to have committed a crime…

“A law passed in 1940 created an immigrant registry to catch suspected communists, and the government aired TV ads reminding all immigrants, including permanent residents, to register annually at local post offices… By the 1960s, the government decided it was too costly and provided little benefit.

“Trump’s planned registry would require anyone in the country illegally who hasn’t interacted with the government, such as by applying for asylum or a work permit, to come forward. The administration plans to create a registration form and give them 30 days to complete it after the registry is established…

“President George W. Bush created a similar immigration registry after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, when his administration required men and boys from predominantly Muslim countries to submit photographs and fingerprints to the federal government… Tens of thousands of people who registered under that program were arrested and deported.”

These are frightening developments. 

Brazil Censors Rumble 

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 22:

“Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered video sharing platform Rumble to be taken offline in the Latin American country within 24 hours. In his decision, Moraes said Rumble has not complied with court orders, such as appointing a legal representative for Brazil…

“In response, Rumble said the platform is experiencing ‘unprecedented censorship in Brazil.’ The company, which has headquarters in both Canada and Florida, said Morae’s orders are ‘in response to our refusal to censor political dissidents residing in the United States.’… Rumble is responsible for the back-services for [Trump’s] Truth Social media site…. A venture capital company co-founded by current Vice President JD Vance invested in Rumble in 2021…

“The crackdown on Rumble in Brazil comes after Moraes ordered the suspension of Elon Musk’s x, also for failing to appoint a legal representative in the country.  Although Musk was angered by the order, the company eventually complied with Moraes’ demands around a month later, with X being brought back online in Brazil… Moraes is a powerful figure in Brazilian politics.” 

Trump Backpedals on Gaza

JTA wrote on February 21:

“President Donald Trump said Friday he would ‘recommend’ — but was ‘not forcing’ — his plan to depopulate the Gaza Strip and have the United States take it over, as Arab states have roundly rejected the idea and tensions mount over the Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage release deal… ‘I think that’s the plan that really works,’ Trump said. ‘But I’m not forcing it. I’m just going to sit back and recommend it’…

“Trump has predicted that Arab states would come around to the idea of depopulating Gaza, but they have not…” 

Our Politics Is a Disgrace 

Bild Online wrote on February 21:

“The Palestinians of Hamas know no boundaries: the planned, annihilating terrorist slaughter of October 7, 2023. The display of corpses and hostages, the triumphal processions for child butchers in the Gaza Strip. Medieval gauntlet running for the kidnapped and abused. Dark bunker dungeons for more than a year. Then the ‘release’ by Hamas as the ultimate humiliation: the hostages were used as propaganda puppets. And on German streets, from the far left to the center, they are demonstrating FOR Hamas and the Palestinians. FOR terrorists. AGAINST Jews, AGAINST the State of Israel. And our state is still giving money there – directly and indirectly. We are still handing out double passes to the enemies of Israel and our way of life…

“Now the German-Israeli Bibas family has been wiped out. Two small children: murdered by Hamas while they were being held hostage ‘with their bare hands,’ as the Israeli army now says. Cold-blooded. Who can do that? Who has the heart to do that? They are the barbarians who killed babies in the womb on kibbitzes so that no Jews would grow back. And these barbarians hand over the wrong body – it’s not the mother… [But the dead mother, brutally murdered by Hamas, allegedly while in captivity, was subsequently handed over to Israel.]

“If their abduction did not lead to any recognizable action by our federal government, then what does their death lead to, and what follows from the disgusting game with Shiri’s remains? Audible: nothing. Once again nothing concrete…

“As Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier was one of these political moral preachers. As our Federal President, he regularly and quite rightly speaks of… Israel’s right to exist. But what does all this mean? How far is he willing to go? Is there more than just Sunday speeches? When will the man… demand real consequences from the federal government?” 

Not Like Germany, Please!

The New York Post wrote on February 21:

“The First Amendment is our sacred safeguard against becoming a censorious hellscape — like Germany, where insulting a politician can land you in prison. Even supposedly ‘free’ Western countries are liable to crack down on free speech at a moment’s notice… It should make us all grateful that expressive rights are enshrined in our Constitution. But it’s also a reminder of how vigilant we need to be to ensure we don’t succumb to the same censorious fate. As Germany demonstrates, banning ‘hate speech’ is a slippery slope to abandoning free speech altogether…. 

“… once you open the door to prosecuting ‘hate speech,’ you no longer actually have free speech. ‘Hate speech’ is an amorphous term that can be defined differently by every judge, every prosecutor, and every individual. The crackdown on ‘hate speech’ in Germany has been applied in some pretty laughable contexts…”

These concerns are justified. It starts with censoring and prohibiting free speech, burning books, and what is next?

Needed: A European Army 

Vg-no wrote on February 25:

“We have no choice. The EU must become one united state. Should we have 27 different armies, and be feared by no one, or should we unite into a superpower that no one dares to threaten. That’s what Guillaume Ancel asks. He has fought as a French military officer in Rwanda, Cambodia and Bosnia for over 20 years. Now he wants to use his legitimacy as a military expert to promote a European federation , the United States of Europe, or USE.

“We knew we were threatened by Putin’s Russia, but now we discover we are threatened by Trump’s USA. And tomorrow it will be Xi Jinping’s China, he says… So the answer is simple, he believes: A federal structure, a democratically elected president, and a joint army. Under this force, France’s nuclear weapons would become Europe’s nuclear weapons, Ancel says… Ancel believes it will take courage for EU countries to give up their sovereignty , but that it is the only option.”

Germany’s Next Government

The Guardian wrote on February 23, 2025:

“… veteran political ­analyst Herfried Münkler… wrote in the newspaper Die Zeit… ‘The next government will have to take great pains to reassert German leadership in Europe.’… Merz (CDU) has said he aims to build a new ­governing ­alliance by Easter, setting up long weeks of tense negotiations in which Germany will be focused inward.

“His most likely partner will be Scholz’s Social Democrats…”

Report 24 speculated on February 23 that sooner or later, the CDU will collaborate with the AfD. In the past, the AfD claimed on occasion that Merz is more right-wing and conservative than even the AfD.

Trump Does Not Care For Germany

Bild Online wrote on February 22:

“US President Donald Trump has a new message for the Germans. And it goes something like this: I don’t care about you – nor about your new government… When he was asked in the White House on Friday afternoon to comment on the federal election, he shrugged off: ‘I wish you luck.’ Then he added with a grin: ‘We have our own problems here.’…

“No other US president in post-war history has ever made such a succinct statement about the Federal Republic or made it so obvious that Germany is a side note for them. This makes it clear: Germany cannot expect any leniency in the impending tariff war and must fear for the military protection of the USA.

“Trump doesn’t like Germany… He certainly didn’t like Angela Merkel… He said about the Chancellor: ‘She’s crazy. She is ruining Germany.’ What was meant was her asylum policy.”

Or Does He?

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 23:

“US President Donald Trump on Sunday said that a victory by conservatives was a good thing for Germany and the world. Writing on his Truth social platform, Trump said, ‘Much like the USA, the people of Germany got tired of the no common sense agenda, especially on energy and immigration, that has prevailed for so many years.’

‘‘This is a great day for Germany, and for the United States of America under the leadership of a gentleman named Donald J. Trump,’ he continued, adding, ‘Congratulations to all — many more victories to follow!!!’…”

However, Germany’s immediate future does not look rosy.

What Now?

Deutsche Welle wrote on February 23:

“Alice Weidel, leader of the AfD… said the AfD is prepared to enter a coalition government… But given that the CDU and other major parties have ruled out working with the AfD…, Weidel claims that the CDU have effectively adopted most of the AfD’s manifesto and says: ‘They’re going to have to explain to their voters how they’re going to implement those promises while working with left-wing parties. If they form a government with the SPD and Greens, then interim chancellor Merz won’t last four years.’…

“To form a government, a majority of at least 316 seats out of the 630 seats in the Bundestag is needed. A coalition between CDU and AfD would have been possible numerically, as both parties easily pass this threshold, adding up to 358. But according to conservative leader Friedrich Merz, this is out of the question. That leaves Olaf Scholz’s SPD as a possible partner, which together with CDU scrape by with 328 seats. A bigger majority could be formed if CDU were to add the Greens to the mix, reaching 416. But the CDU’s junior partner CSU has repeatedly ruled out governing with the Greens…  Theoretically, the CDU could also lead a 3-party coalition that includes SPD and the Left party, but this is highly unlikely given very deep ideological differences between the conservatives and the far-left faction…”

“Friedrich Merz sharply criticized Donald Trump’s administration and urged Europe to distance from Washington during a post-election panel airing on state broadcaster ARD….”

The CDU won, followed by the AfD, the SPD, the Green party and the Left. The left-leaning BSW [under Sahra Wagenknecht; the BSW is different from the Left party and broke away from it] and the FDP did not make the 5% hurdle. Current Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD) announced that he would be willing to negotiate about a leadership role within a new government. The SPD under Scholz suffered the most devastating defeat since World War II. The CDU did not do as well as they had hoped.

However one wants to look at it… this election hasn’t changed much and Germany’s current downfall may continue for a while. Bottom line: Another disaster! No wonder that according to Focus, many Germans complain that their lives won’t be better after the election.

AfD’s Big Success

Reuters wrote on February 23:

“The Alternative for Germany, which has morphed since it was founded in 2013 from a party of libertarian economists to an anti-immigration, pro-Russia group, [has] won the backing of one-in-five Germans… AfD leader Alice Weidel told supporters… that it would be tantamount to ‘electoral fraud’ if the first-placed conservatives chose to govern with left-wing parties rather than them. If that happened, she said, ‘next time we’ll come first.’ Weidel, the leader of a nativist party that preaches traditional family values while raising her children with a Swiss-based woman of Sri Lankan background, said the AfD was now ‘a mainstream party’…

“One leading figure is regional boss Bjoern Hoecke… [The AfD] became the largest party in Hoecke’s home state of Thuringia last year, and did sufficiently well elsewhere that only improbable and tricky coalitions of centre-right and far left could keep them out of office…

“The president of Germany’s Central Jewish Council, Josef Schuster, told Welt newspaper he was shocked at the strength of the AfD’s result…”

Even though the positions of the AfD change from time, they recently announced that they are for the reinstatement of a mandatory 2-year military service, and, according to the article above, “drastically restricting migration, disbanding the European Union and dropping support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.” They have also suggested, however, to replace the EU with a more limited group of like-minded core nations.

Austria’s FPÖ Congratulates

Report 24 wrote on February 23:

“FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl sent… a heartfelt congratulation [to Alice Weidel from the AfD]…

“’The patriotic turnaround is well underway and it cannot be stopped, but only delayed, because it is supported by honest love for the homeland, for one’s own people, for freedom and for the truth!'”

Merz Backtracks on Borders

Breitbart wrote on February 25:

“Hours after his party’s victory in Germany’s federal elections, likely incoming chancellor Friedrich Merz began to soften his stance on immigration as he looks to form a coalition with leftist parties rather than the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany…

“While Merz campaigned as a supposed immigration hardliner, [he] appears to be following the tradition of notionally right-wing politicians abandoning their election-time promises once the votes have been counted.”

Merz— Corporate King in Conservative Clothing

UnHerd wrote on February 22, 2025:

“At the ripe age of 69, Friedrich Merz has waited decades for this moment… he is Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting… He’ll have to cobble together another coalition of disparate parties, but Merz won’t mind. Come Monday morning, he will have completed one of the most remarkable comebacks in recent political history… he is effectively running on a ‘Make Germany Great Again’ platform — a calculated attempt to win votes from the Alternative for Germany (AfD) by shifting his party to the Right on issues such as immigration. His cynicism here shouldn’t be underestimated: like Donald Trump in America, the millionaire Merz is a corporate king in conservative clothing.

“Merz… has long represented the interests of some of the world’s most powerful corporate and financial elites, most notably as a key representative of BlackRock in Germany between 2016 and 2020. Indeed,… Germany will become the first country to be ruled by a former BlackRock official. But his ties to elite institutions go back much further: for over two decades, even before joining BlackRock, he embodied the revolving door between politics, business and finance… Pharmaceuticals, entertainment, media and, of course, war — there is virtually no sector that BlackRock won’t try and profit from… Under Merz’s influence, for instance, BlackRock became one of the largest non-German shareholders in many of the country’s most important companies — from Deutsche Bank to Volkswagen, BMW to Siemens. Yet his work wasn’t just about increasing profits for shareholders; it was also about shaping a political environment where corporate interests were aligned with government policy…

“But then it’s hard to truly believe that ordinary Germans are Merz’s concern. Once a Davos Man, always a Davos Man — and his long history of representing powerful industries, including the chemical, financial and metallurgic sectors, suggests he will have other priorities. As chancellor, for instance, Merz could be called upon to regulate sectors with which he has long been associated…

“Recall, too, that under Merz’s leadership the CDU has received millions of euros in campaign donations from the very business interests he represented in the past… For both German and global corporate lobbyists, then, having Merz — a former colleague — as chancellor would be a dream come true. Or, as [finance expert Werner] Rügemer puts it: ‘This is putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.’

“Merz’s corporate connections shape his foreign policy as well. At heart, he’s… a firm believer in America’s role as the guarantor of the global order. This ideological stance has led Merz to align with the US on issues such as the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, calling for the project’s cancellation long before the escalation of the Ukraine crisis… Now, of course, Washington has a very different Ukraine policy. So will Merz be forced to abandon his Atlanticist beliefs? Not necessarily. Though his strong anti-Russian stance and militaristic tendencies seem at odds with Trump’s efforts to de-escalate the conflict, the reality is that their visions are more aligned than might initially seem to be the case.

“What, in the end, does Trump demand from Europe? Higher defence spending and a significant role in shouldering both the financial and strategic responsibilities for post-war security in Ukraine, something which could even involve the deployment of a European ‘peacekeeping’ force. These policies align neatly with Merz’s own vision. He has long advocated boosting Germany’s defence budget, a stance welcomed by his corporate allies in the German military-industrial complex. Now, in fact, he has joined the chorus calling for Europe to ‘take its security into its own hands’. Trump couldn’t ask for more. This strategic convergence, coupled with Merz’s conservative leanings, deep ties to the US financial and corporate sectors, and ingrained Atlanticism, all make him well-placed to become America’s European ‘vassal-in-chief’ in our post-liberal era. This would place Germany back at the helm of a European Union that is both economically weaker and militarily emboldened — even as it remains strategically adrift.

“This arrangement will be accompanied by much rhetoric about German and European ‘autonomy’ — and possibly even heated public disagreements between Berlin and Washington. In reality, though, it would largely be a façade, for the new dynamic would merely serve European and American elites. The former would continue to stoke the fear of Russia as a means to justify more defence spending, directing funds away from social programmes and legitimising their continued crackdown on democracy. As for the latter, they would continue benefiting from Europe’s economic dependence on the US…

“Not that we should be surprised. Over the past two decades, Merz, just like Trump, has proved himself a businessman first and a politician second. Yet unlike Trump, who at least has some populist credentials, Merz’s victory will be celebrated in the boardrooms of BlackRock and other major corporations, which can expect to see their bank balances start ticking steadily upwards. As so often, though, ordinary voters should not expect this bounty to flow their way.”

We are citing below the following article about Merz, which was published in 2018, but which is as relevant today as it was then.

Friedrich Merz and BlackRock

On November 29, 2018, Deutsche Welle wrote about Friedrich Merz who tried to replace Angela Merkel as Chancellor before, but his attempt failed:

“The sheer scale of BlackRock’s finances makes its influence on the world unlike that of any other company. Now one of its board members in Germany, Friedrich Merz, wants to succeed Chancellor Angela Merkel… If successful, he would be the first German leader to come directly out of the so-called shadow banking system, and the first leader to have previously been a highly paid lobbyist for a global financial institution.

“Shadow banks are generally defined as financial institutions that work like banks but aren’t subject to the same regulatory systems. Their growing power, which dwarfs the likes of Amazon, Facebook and Google (all of which BlackRock invests money in) means that financial market speculation has become one of the biggest movers of money in the world. Many critics of the market system believe this destabilizes the world economy by incentivizing risk, the trade in bad loans, and investing via unregulated markets, known as ‘dark pools.’ The rise of shadow banking has been blamed for causing the subprime mortgage catastrophe of 2007-2008 and the global recession that followed.

“Merz heads the supervisory board of the German branch of BlackRock, the biggest asset management corporation in the world, which controls some $6.3 trillion (€5.56 trillion) in assets — twice Germany’s gross domestic product. Two venerable German researchers, political scientist Peter Grottian and finance expert Werner Rügemer, appeared in Berlin on Wednesday to warn against letting Merz take control of the German government…

“BlackRock’s activities have attracted the attention of the authorities. Police searched BlackRock’s offices in Munich earlier this month as part of an investigation into the ‘cum-ex’ tax evasion scandal, which cost European taxpayers some €55 billion. That investigation is related to the period from 2007 to 2011, five years before Merz joined the company…

“‘There has never been a company like BlackRock before,’ said Heike Buchter, who published a book on the company in 2015, in a recent interview with the IPG Journal. ‘No one else has comparable access to companies, governments, regulators and central banks than BlackRock.’… During his career as a Bundestag member, he opposed the minimum wage and argued for cutting social benefits and limiting the power of trade unions. His possible ascension to the chancellery would therefore grant the financial power broker unprecedented control of Europe’s largest economy.”

Merz Challenges von der Leyen

Politico wrote on February 21:

“Ursula von der Leyen is about to face the most serious challenge to her leadership since she became European Commission president six years ago… ]Merz] has made no secret of his plans to weigh in much more heavily on EU affairs than his predecessor, Olaf Scholz…  ‘The EU must not come to Washington as a dwarf — because then it will be treated as one,’ Merz told a recent campaign event in Germany.

“The signal from Berlin that Germany is ready to take on more leadership in the European Union should be welcome news for von der Leyen, who stands to gain a powerful conservative ally that happens to be well versed in EU affairs (Merz was a European lawmaker from 1989 to 1994). In Brussels, you’ll even often hear grumbling that a victory for Merz will simply mean that the EU will be run by two German Christian Democrats.

“But a closer look suggests that ‘Queen Ursula’… is unlikely to share the stage easily with the CDU leader. Von der Leyen, 66, has reigned supreme in Brussels ever since former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, her political patron, helped to catapult her into the powerful executive role in 2019. Indeed, while von der Leyen was promoted to defense minister under Merkel, Merz was shunted aside and quit politics to work as a corporate lawyer.

“Von der Leyen has taken advantage of French President Emmanuel Macron and Scholz’s relative weakness to accrue influence, centralizing the bloc’s response to the Covid pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Now she’ll have to contend with one of Merkel’s fiercest rivals in the CDU, a connoisseur of EU affairs who will loom large as the most powerful conservative at the European leaders’ table, where he intends to increase the power of capitals at Brussels’ expense…” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

It is useful to appreciate who Ezra was. What was his family line? This is listed in Ezra 7:1-5. In this list, certain names stand out, Hilkiah, who was the high priest in the days of Josiah, 2 Chronicles 34:9, Zadok the priest in the days of David and Solomon, and going back further, Phineas, Eleazar and Aaron, the chief priest. So, Ezra was of the priestly line; in fact, going by his ancestors, very distinguished in the priestly line. He was one of over four thousand priests in Judea, most of whom had already returned to Judea years before Ezra. But he was the one selected by God to restore the true religious observance and worship in the country. He is reputed to have written three books of the Bible, Ezra, and the last two books of the Jewish Scriptures, 1 and 2 Chronicles. He also arranged the books of the Old Testament in the order in which we have them today in the Hebrew Bible, but not in the English Bible (compare “The Authority of the Bible”, page 85). So important was he in the eyes of his people that later tradition regarded him as no less than a second Moses. It is interesting that Ezra himself is not even mentioned in his book until the seventh chapter.

He was sent back by the king to investigate the spiritual condition of the Jews in Judea. This is mentioned in Ezra 7:14. The time setting of his return is mentioned in Ezra 7:1: “Now after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia…” These things were the building and dedication of the temple and the keeping of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, mentioned in Ezra, chapter 6. These events had occurred over fifty years earlier before Ezra came to Jerusalem, so the term “after these things” does not mean immediately after them.

The people of Israel had had a great amount of zeal during the building of the temple with the encouragement of the prophets Haggai and Zechariah. In Haggai 2:6-7, we read, “For thus says the LORD of hosts: ‘Once more (it is a little while) I will shake heaven and earth, the sea and dry land; and I will shake all nations, and they shall come to the Desire of All Nations, and I will fill this temple with glory,’ says the LORD of hosts.” However, after the fifty-plus-years-period since completing the temple, nothing in this prophecy had occurred and there was the strong probability that the people had become slack concerning the observance of God’s Law.  

This was a reason for the king to send Ezra to Judea to inquire about their spiritual condition which is stated in Ezra 7:23: “Whatever is commanded by the God of heaven, let it diligently be done for the house of the God of heaven. For why should there be wrath against the realm of the king and his sons?” He did not want the God of heaven to be displeased about what was happening in Judea and bring wrath on the king’s and his sons’ kingdom.

Ezra was fluent in two languages, Aramaic and Hebrew. In fact, parts of the book of Ezra were written in Aramaic (Ezra 4:8 to 6:18 and 7:12-16), but the majority of the book was written in Hebrew. At the time of Ezra, it is claimed that the language commonly spoken by the ordinary people was Aramaic, not Hebrew, although the religious, governmental and upper class did use Hebrew. The two languages have similarities but are not identical.

Ezra was an expert in the Law of Moses, commonly called the Torah, which made him a scribe as well as a priest. But why did he have to be skilled? This is mentioned in Ezra 7:6, “… this Ezra came up from Babylon; and he was a skilled scribe in the Law of Moses, which the LORD God had given. The king granted him all his request, according to the hand of the LORD his God upon him.” This is reinforced in Ezra 7:11, “This is a copy of the letter that king Artaxerxes gave Ezra the priest, the scribe, expert in the words of the commandments of the LORD, and of His statutes to Israel.”

The language of Hebrew has a number of features which, to be understood fully, require much instruction, training and knowledge. The first obstacle to be overcome is that the writing of the official scrolls in the temple or synagogues had no vowels. If we were to look at a modern printed Hebrew Bible, we would see marks under the letters suggesting which vowels, accents and pronunciations to employ for the text to make sense. However, these markings were added around the time of the Masoretes, somewhere around the eighth or ninth centuries CE. While the Masoretes were extremely accurate in copying the consonants in the scrolls, their additions as mentioned were according to their best understanding at the time.

To understand why skill was needed, we could look at a simple Hebrew word like “dm,” using English letters. It basically means “red”. When vowels are added, it can be either Adam or Edom, depending on context. The Masoretes added the required vowel marks to suggest which was the correct meaning. However, Ezra had to know what the correct meaning was because when he read it, there were no added prompts or markings for him to use at that time.

To complicate the situation further, there were no word breaks between words. The word breaks had been added more recently, probably again in the time of the Masoretes. Ezra had to determine where words started and finished among a continuous row of letters. As an English example, we might read “gtthntyslggrd” and after some thought realise it was “Go to the ant you sluggard,” by adding vowels and word breaks. However, the word breaks are usually correctly inserted but in extremely rare cases they are not in the correct position.

An example of this is in Proverbs 26:23: “Fervent lips with a wicked heart Are like earthenware covered with silver dross.” When analysed, fervent lips and a wicked heart are opposites, designating hypocrisy. However, with an earthenware pot covered with silver dross, both are of little value, silver dross, commonly called slag, being what’s left after the silver has been refined and removed from the ore. But if the word breaks are slightly modified, and the correct vowels added, “silver dross” becomes “glaze”, which has the effect of making something cheap and common look valuable, thus redefining the sentence into two opposites: “Fervent lips compared with a wicked heart” and “Cheap earthenware compared with a beautifully glazed item of pottery.” The glaze hides the cheapness of the item, in a similar way that fervent lips hide the wickedness of the heart.

The reason the word break was placed in the wrong position in that passage by the Masoretes was that the Hebrew word referring to glaze was unknown in the period when they finalised their text, but the words for silver and dross were known. By making the word breaks in particular positions and inserting the corresponding seemingly appropriate vowels, they could make some sort of sense, although not giving the correct meaning. More recent translations have corrected this error and, as an example, the Good News Version renders this proverb as “Insincere talk that hides what you are really thinking is like a fine glaze on a cheap clay pot.”

Aside from adding the correct vowels and word breaks, Ezra also had to be very familiar with the Oral Law. It refers to Jewish legal traditions and interpretations that are not part of the written Torah. They were passed down orally. Some of those were adopted to enable one to correctly obey many written laws, the details of which were not revealed in the written Law. However, many of those were added to “make a fence for the Law,” especially when referring to the Sabbath. Their additions and interpretations were rejected by Jesus Christ (compare “God’s Commanded Holy Days,” pages 17 following).

It is intended in a future Q&A to explain the necessity and history of the Oral Law.

So, we see that for Ezra to carry out the commission that God gave to him to restore true religion to the land of Judea, he had to understand the Scriptures in fine detail, including pronunciation and providing correct word breaks. He would have needed much instruction and training and inspiration from God. Also, he needed to know in minute detail the correct oral laws necessary to be able to apply God’s Law in the right way. Therefore, he needed to be a highly “skilled Scribe,” and an “expert in the words of the commandments of the LORD.”

Lead Writer: Paul Niehoff (Australia)

compiled by Dave Harris

“Is Germany Now on the Brink of Change?” is the title of a new StandingWatch program presented by Evangelist Norbert Link. Here is the summary:

With Friedrich Merz’s election victory, will there be a new sheriff in Berlin? It is assumed that he will become the new Chancellor, and coalition negotiations with the defeated left-leaning SPD are underway; because he currently does not want to enter into a coalition with the right-wing AfD. But what might happen in the future? And who is Merz anyway? What does he stand for, and what is his past?

“Steht Deutschland jetzt vor der Wende?” is the title of a new AufPostenStehen program presented by Norbert Link. This German program covers the same topic as described above.

“Cain and Abel – The First Murder” is the latest video published in our Bible Stories series on YouTube.

“Angst und Gier,” last Sabbath’s first split German sermon presented by Andreas Raetz, is now posted. Title in English: “Fear and Greed.”

“Wandeln mit Gott,” last Sabbath’s second split German sermon presented by Daniel Blasinger, is now posted. Title in English: “Walking with God.”

“With Raised Hands,” last Sabbath’s sermonette presented by Kalon Mitchell, is now posted. Here is the summary:

What can we learn from an event found in the Old Testament? The Bible includes stories so that we can think about them and use them for edification.

“Europe in Biblical Prophecy,” last Sabbath’s sermon presented by Norbert Link, is now posted. Here is the summary:

Many do not understand that, according to the Bible, the ancient Roman Empire would be revived ten times in Europe, and that the last seven resurrections would be a collaboration between the Catholic Church and the European Empire. All of these revivals have already taken place…except for the last one, which is unfolding before our eyes today and will culminate in the Great Tribulation and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. This sermon examines the European resurrections of the ancient Roman Empire in history, including the blasphemous mark of the beast and the demonic nature of the European revivals.