Should YOU Fight in War?

What does the Bible teach us about our Christian responsibility when it comes to fighting for our country?

Is it correct, as some teach, that the Bible allows, if not enjoins, Christians to participate in the military and to engage in warfare, either to attack another country or to defend their own country against aggressors? Do the teachings of Christ and His followers allow, or even demand, that we take up arms to fight against those who want to harm and destroy us, our loved ones, or our nation?

Should a true follower of Christ participate in wars that are fought by the powers of this world, based on whatever "logical" reasoning would lead to justification for such action?

What Civil and Religious Leaders Say

Before we look at the very clear teachings of the Bible, let us review a few statements from civil and religious leaders that address this subject. Consider whether you would agree or disagree with the following quotes:

Pope Pius XII declared at the beginning of World War II: "Everything is gained by peace, nothing is gained by war."

Shortly after the end of World War II, General Omar Bradley had this to say: "The world has achieved ... power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living." He also said: "We have built the atom bomb, but forgotten the Sermon on the Mount."

Pope Paul VI stated in 1965 during a UN assembly: "If you want to be brothers, put your weapons down. You cannot love with aggressive weapons in your hands."

Dwight D. Eisenhower expressed his viewpoint in this way: "There is only one solution for our generation: It is the return to a life based on Christ's Sermon on the Mount."

Martin Luther King, Jr. said in his sermon, "The Most Durable Power": "Always avoid violence. If you succumb to the temptation of using violence in your struggle, unborn generations will be recipients of a long and desolate night of bitterness, and your chief legacy to the future will be an endless reign of meaningless chaos."

On the other hand, former German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt said: "You cannot rule a country with the Sermon on the Mount."

A Catholic Catechism, published in 1975 in Switzerland, stated: "The injunctions in the Sermon on the Mount are not to be taken literally, as this would lead to unacceptable circumstances both in private and public life."

The Book of Common Prayers reasoned: "It is lawful for Christian men, at the commandment of the Magistrate, to wear weapons, and serve in the wars."

Francis A. Schaeffer said in "A Christian Manifesto": "I am not a pacifist because pacifism in this fallen world in which we live means that we desert the people who need our greatest help."

C.S. Lewis wrote in "Mere Christianity": "Does loving your enemy mean not punishing him? No, for loving myself does not mean that I ought not to subject myself to punishment - even to death. If one had committed a murder, the right Christian thing to do would be to give yourself up to the police and be hanged. It is, therefore, in my opinion, perfectly right for a Christian judge to sentence a man to death or a Christian soldier to kill an enemy."

Who is right? Would you agree with any of these?

Is it "perfectly right" for a Christian to sit in judgment over another person - be it as a judge or a juror? Is it "perfectly right" for a Christian to kill another person - be it as a soldier or as a policeman? And what about innocent bystanders - the proverbial, unavoidable "casualties of war"?

Albert Einstein noted: "Mere lip services for peace are easy, but without effect. What we need is active participation in a fight against war and everything leading to war."

Terrible Consequences of War

Throughout this booklet, we will consider some interesting quotes from famous persons who might have understood something regarding the issue of war and peace, which sadly, most people have failed to comprehend. However, regardless of the conclusions of our discussion, one fact should be clear: Every war has terrible consequences, both economically and in terms of human suffering and pain.

On October 26, 2004, the Washington Post reported: "Yale University economist William D. Nordhaus estimated that in inflation-adjusted terms, World War I cost just under $200 billion for the United States. The Vietnam War cost about $500 billion from 1964 to 1972, Nordhaus said. The cost of the Iraq war could reach nearly half that number by next fall, 2 1/2 years after it began."

Der Stern Online published a shocking article, describing the terrible psychological consequences for soldiers returning from war. The article was published on July 15, 2004, and was titled, "The Trauma of War." Doctors and scientists examined German soldiers returning from Kosovo and Afghanistan, and reported their frightening and disturbing findings: "Some say that they beat their children, when helping them with their school work - something that they had never done before... In other cases, they show no more emotions, neither joy nor sadness... Many try desperately to forget the past. They withdraw, drink or take drugs. Some become depressive and avoid their friends... In extreme cases, returning soldiers go berserk and kill others." The article also pointed out that "traumatic developments, following experiences in war, can be proven bio-chemically in the brain."

On May 7, 2004, ABC News published an insightful article, discussing the horrible effects of war. The article stated (emphasis supplied):

"The specifics of the incidents at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq [where Iraqi prisoners were tortured by U.S. soldiers] remain to be sorted out. But the answer seems apparent for experts in the psychology of war and other mental health professionals contacted by ABC NEWS - such behavior is not uncommon in a time of military conflict and the potential to abuse others may lie in all of us. `In war, things do happen, often from emotion of the moment, exhaustion, frustration - a buddy killed, a unit hurt,' maintains Samuel Watson, a former infantry officer in the Vietnam War who is now associate professor of public health at [the] University of Pittsburgh... And Dr. Carlyle Chan, professor of psychiatry at [the] Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, says prisoner abuse is probably more prevalent than we would like to believe, given the trauma soldiers can experience."

The article continued to ask: "What drives soldiers to abuse others in time of war? The key, believe these experts, is `the MILITARY CULTURE' the soldiers and guards were immersed in. In war, `the enemy is not represented as a similar human being to oneself, but rather as a brute who is savage and single-minded in destructive intentions,' says Rona M. Fields, director for cognitive sciences at the Center for Advanced Defense Studies at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. This depersonalization, explains Evans, is a psychological defense against the horrible events soldiers witness during war. But once the enemy is seen as LESS THAN HUMAN, it can be easy to treat them accordingly.

"Another motivation for U.S. soldiers to mistreat Iraqi prisoners may have been simple RETALIATION, suggests Dr. Paul Ragan, a Navy psychiatrist during Desert Storm and now associate professor of psychiatry at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn. `The emotional center of the brain, or the limbic system, wants to strike back...'"

ABC News asked this question: "But what if the leadership itself is commanding soldiers to behave in abusive ways? Would normal individuals be willing to follow morally abhorrent orders?"

The history of man has proven that the answer, tragically, is affirmative. Nazis, working at and supervising concentration camps, defended their brutal tortures and murders with these words: "I only followed orders." And so, ABC News continued, in quoting another expert: "Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process... [even] when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality."

The New Testament Teaching on War

What, then, is the Biblical view of war? We will first look at the very clear and decisive teachings on the issue of war and peace in the New Testament.

As a general truism, we are encouraged by Christ, as well as His apostles after His resurrection, to live in peace with ALL men. This includes, of course, a prohibition to fight against others, or to retaliate, or even to condemn. Romans 12:17-21 says: "Repay no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all men. If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men. Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to [God's] wrath; for it is written, `Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,' says the Lord. Therefore, `If your enemy is hungry, feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head.' Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good."

We are told to overcome evil with good. We are also told that this means, NOT to avenge ourselves, but rather, to give our enemy food and drink. Obviously, this is telling us that we are not to kill him. That would be "evil." Rather, we are to overcome evil with "good." In feeding our enemy, we heap coals of fire on his head; that is, he will see our good deeds and he will be embarrassed when considering his animosity toward us, compared with our good will toward him.

This Biblical principle teaches HOW to overcome evil with good, not by using a weapon and killing the person [which is evil], but by helping and providing for him [which is good].

Romans 14:19 tells us: "Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another." And 1 Peter 3:8-12 adds: "Finally, all of you be of one mind, having compassion for one another; love as brothers, be tenderhearted, be courteous; not returning evil for evil or reviling for reviling, but on the contrary blessing, knowing that you were called to this, that you may inherit a blessing. For `He who would love life And see good days, Let him refrain his tongue from evil, And his lips from speaking deceit. Let him turn away from evil and do good; Let him seek peace and pursue it. For the eyes of the LORD are on the righteous, And His ears are open to their prayers; But the face of the LORD is against those who do evil.'"

Notice that NOT seeking peace and pursuing it is labeled as "evil." Refraining our tongues from evil means to refrain from speaking evil about our enemy. Each war begins with words, with propaganda, with hateful comments about others, until a government's decision to attack and fight against a foreign country - the enemy - seems to be justified in the eyes of the citizens. As a prime example, Adolph Hitler could never have convinced many Germans to approve of "total war," if his propaganda machine, under Joseph Goebbels, had not carefully prepared them, far in advance, for such a viewpoint.

God says in His Word that He considers us to be righteous when we turn away from evil or when we refrain from saying or doing evil against others. But just refraining from evil is only half of the picture. We must complete the picture by truly seeking peace by actively pursuing it, in effect, making peace. We must want peace enough to make the effort to create it, and you can be sure, such an effort will be plainly evident in both our words AND our actions.

A German TV moderator, Dr. Franz Alt, wrote a book, "Peace Is Possible," in which he addressed the way to peace and the way to war, as follows: "Nothing is without consequence. Long before a war breaks out, it has been prepared, that is, it has begun before in the minds of the people and the media ... Our history books are dominated by Alexander and Caesar, Nero and Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin. Jesus ... [is] just a footnote ... We learn the wrong things about the wrong people. We focus too much on the representatives of violence and too little on the important and sense-giving people ... What has more reality for us - the faith in God or in weapons? Whom do we trust more - the Son of God or world powers? Whom do we hope to receive salvation from - the Spirit which makes alive or the weapons which bring death?"

The Way of Peace

Let us consider what Christ's half-brother, James, tells us in James 3:18: "Now the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace."

Here, we see the relationship between righteousness - or right living - and the creation of peace. Christ teaches us in Matthew 5:6-10: "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, For they shall be filled. Blessed are the merciful, For they shall obtain mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart, For they shall see God. Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God. Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

When we hunger and thirst for righteousness, as evidenced by not hurting others through our words or actions, we are showing mercy toward them. Our hearts will become purer and purer when we live Christ's way of mercy, compassion and peace. We will become more and more successful in substituting God's pure word for the wrong concepts of this world, which falsely teach that anger, condemnation, and ultimately war, is the answer to our problems.

Consider these famous words from General Douglas McArthur that he uttered at the end of World War II: "It must be of the spirit [that is, we need a new way of thinking] if we are to save the flesh."

Albert Einstein said something similar, when discussing the destructiveness of nuclear bombs: "A new way of thinking is inevitable if mankind wants to survive and prosper."

Sadly, the vast majority of mankind has not subscribed to this new way of thinking which was revealed in the Bible thousands of years ago.

Rather, mankind has followed the philosophy of war - a philosophy expressed, for example, by Mao-Tse-Tung in this way: "We want to get rid of war - we don't want war. But we can only get rid of war through war. If we don't want guns, we must take up guns."

This wrong philosophy has not brought peace, and it will never bring peace. On the other hand, Mahatma Ghandi understood something that most people don't when he said, "Absence of violence is not a sign of weakness, but it is the weapon of a brave heart."

The purity of God's doctrine will convince us to become peacemakers. Ironically, when we advocate peace, pursue and practice it, we can expect persecution from others who believe in and teach the concept of war. But if we want to be children of God, we must be peacemakers - we must teach and live the way that leads to peace. We must reject the opposite way, which only brings about war, misery and death. As true followers of Christ, we must not participate in war in any manner, shape or form.

Christ tells us very clearly what He means when He commands us NOT to fight our enemies - but to live in peace with them. He said in Matthew 5:43-45: "You have heard that it was said, `You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust." (Compare, too, Luke 6:27-28, 35-36.)

Let us ask ourselves: How do those teachings match up with the philosophy of hate and war - the concept that we must forcefully avenge ourselves against those who have overtaken us; who are trying to rob us of our land and possessions; who are in the process of suppressing our ideals and our philosophy?

Christ advocated a peaceful way of life, leaving it to God the Father to bring vengeance upon His enemies, and we must do the same! The Bible explains to us the only way to peace, a way which we MUST learn and put into practice. That way has never been taught, nor applied, by man in general. Rather, the world would have us believe that "That way does not work." Even professing Christianity often teaches that it won't be practical until everyone else is already living that way. But Christ tells us something altogether different and if we SAY that we are Christ's disciples - the true followers of Christ - then we must DO what He commands. Remember what Christ said: "But why do you call Me `Lord, Lord,' and not do [let alone, believe] the things which I say?" (Luke 6:46).

Professor Dr. Rossi, a Seventh-Day Adventist in Switzerland, wrote in Conscience and Liberty: "Wars begin within the spirit of man, and it is within that spirit that the battle for life and peace must be won."

John the Baptist was called by God to teach man the way to peace. We read the following prophecy about him in Luke 1:76, 79: "And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Highest; For you will go before the face of the Lord to prepare His ways ... To give light to those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death, To guide our feet into the way of peace."

Let us notice a striking example of how John guided people "into the way of peace." When Roman soldiers came to him, asking him what to do, he told them: "Do not intimidate anyone or accuse falsely, and be content with your wages" (Luke 3:14). The Authorized Version says here: "Do violence to no man ... " If they were not allowed to do violence to anyone, they were most certainly not allowed to kill their enemies in war.

Jesus Christ came to proclaim peace - and the WAY to peace - not war. Acts 10:36 tells us that God the Father was "preaching peace through Jesus Christ." God wants man to understand the way to peace, but sadly, most have refused to accept Christ's teachings. And it is even more sad that most people today, professing to be Christians, continue to refuse to actually ACCEPT and PRACTICE Christ's teachings on war and peace. His teachings are very simple. They are not difficult to understand, but people who are not willing to accept them, have tried to make them very complicated.

At one time, Christ lamented the fact that ancient Jerusalem did not know the way to peace. This is still true today. We read in Luke 19:41-42: "Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, saying, `If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes.'"

The way of peace was hidden from their eyes because of not having a desire to open their eyes to see what Christ showed them. What about our eyes, our minds, our hearts? Are they open, or are they still closed?

Unless mankind allows God to open their eyes, man cannot know or understand the way to peace. Paul commented on this fact, in Romans 3:17. That is the reason we don't have peace today. Man has pursued the way of hate, revenge and war, as so vividly described by Paul in Romans 3:10-16. The true reason for all this evil is found in verse 18: "There is no fear of God before their eyes."

The way of war is totally opposite to the way of peace. This should be obvious when we consider where wars come from, how they originate, and why.

The Origin of War

James 4:1-4 clearly explains the origin of war: "Where do wars and fights come from among you? Do they not come from your desires for pleasure that war in your members? You lust and do not have. You murder and covet and cannot obtain. You fight and war. Yet you do not have because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask amiss, that you may spend it on your pleasures. Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God."

James calls us friends of this world, when we participate in wars and fights. During times of patriotic and nationalistic euphoria - when one is called upon to be part of the crowd, the people, the nation, in order to support, advocate, and endorse "our nation's" war - one can easily be considered to be an "enemy" when that person stands out as a conscientious objector. Doubts will arise and questions may be asked, such as, "Is that person perhaps a secret spy, a secret supporter of the enemy, a traitor, a deserter or even a coward?"

We might think in this context of the prophet Jeremiah. He taught the Jews not to fight the Chaldeans under Nebuchadnezzar, but rather, to surrender, as God had decreed that sinful Jerusalem should fall into the hands of the king of Babylon (Jeremiah 27:1-22). The king and the people of Judah did not like that message, and so, they imprisoned Jeremiah, charging him wrongly with being a traitor (compare Jeremiah 37:1-16).

On the other hand, when one strongly advocates war along with everyone else, that person is immediately considered to be a patriot. But we must understand that the war-waging nations of this day and age belong to this world, not to God's future world to come, when He will rule the nations. This is a world in which times of peace are the exception and times of war are the rule. This is a world that may view a particular action as a capital crime of murder in times of peace, while it may declare it as an heroic act of liberation in times of war. However, the Bible says that if we are friends with the world (the world's ways), we will be enemies of God.

Let us quote here from another influential proponent of peace, a true Christian who was even called by national and international politicians and governmental leaders an "unofficial ambassador for peace," and a "builder of bridges between the nations." That man was Herbert W. Armstrong, who wrote many books and booklets until his death in 1986. We are quoting excerpts from his booklet, "Military Service and War," which was written in 1967 and republished in 1985 (pp. 54, 65, 67, 68, 70; emphasis in the original):

"War is so needless. War is WRONG! ... Nearly all the really great religious and political leaders of the world have acknowledged the utter FUTILITY of war ... More lives have been snuffed out prematurely, more suffering has been endured, more homes have been wrecked and broken, more time and property has been utterly wasted because of the scourge of war than through any other means in the history of man! And war has NEVER solved the problems of men or brought permanent peace. Instead, it only breeds more war! ... Countless millions of lives are killed or crippled or ruined. And millions of young men are taught to become effective killers - murderers! Indeed, one of the most devastating indictments against war is that it breeds in whole populations the spirit of violence and MURDER ... More than any other one thing, war breeds the spirit of murder! And that evil spirit is growing and increasing throughout the world today ... War involves learning to hate and kill! ... we must realize that the spirit of war is the spirit of MURDER - and avoid it with all of our strength ... "

In an earlier article of September of 1939, Herbert Armstrong stated the following (emphasis omitted): "God commands us not to fight or kill, whether for Caesar, or anyone else ... . God's laws forbid fighting, strife, or murder ... Christ did condemn strife, fighting, killing, hating ... I cannot personally participate in war or killing ... I cannot bear arms or participate in war ... Politics and war, even though the other nation be in the wrong and the evildoer, are of the world ... [I object to killing because] it is sin, the penalty of which is death ... It is wrong, because God condemns it, and I believe He condemns it because it only results in human suffering and misery and death. I believe no one ever WINS a war - it is, at most, only a matter of which side is the heavier loser. I believe God's ways are RIGHT."

Killing in War Breaks the Ten Commandments

Some have said that killing in war is not in violation of the Ten Commandments. However, James 4:1-2 proves that, according to the Bible, killing in war IS murder. In that passage, which deals with war, James equates war in verse 2 with "murder" when he says, "You murder and covet and cannot obtain. You fight and war." The Greek word used for "murder" is "phoneuo." Jesus uses the same word in Matthew 5:21, quoting one of the Ten Commandments ("You shall not kill" or "murder" - in Greek, "phoneuo.") So both Jesus and James make it clear that the commandment, "You shall not kill," does include the commandment against killing in war.

This can also be seen when considering Christ's statement in Luke 22:36-38, where He asked the disciples to buy swords. Why did He do that? So that prophecy could be fulfilled. And what was the prophecy that had to be fulfilled? That He, Christ, would be numbered with the transgressors. What transgression were the disciples guilty of? That of attempted murder when Peter took the sword to defend the innocent Christ against an illegal arrest. (For a detailed discussion of this passage, see the accompanying box on the next page) Not that the disciples did have swords, and the fact that Peter would later use a sword to injure or perhaps kill someone else, constituted "transgression." It constituted sin, since sin is the transgression of the law, the Ten Commandments (compare 1 John 3:4, Authorized Version).

Just as John the Baptist and Christ proclaimed and taught peace, so we, too, must be willing, even in light of adversity and persecution, to actively work for peace. In Ephesians 6:15, Paul includes in the armor of God, which we are to wear, "feet [shod] with the preparation of the gospel of peace." The gospel of the Kingdom of God is also called a gospel of peace, as it announces a future time of peace when there will be absolutely no more war - a time that has not been experienced in all of the history of mankind from the time Cain slew his brother, Abel!

A Future Peaceful World

Let us review some of the remarkable prophecies that reveal a time when the world will look much different than it does today. While we are reading, let us ask ourselves how those Biblical passages also apply to us in this present world. We are called to be ambassadors of Christ - representatives of God's Kingdom which will soon be established on this earth. We are to be pioneers of a future better world! Our lives today are supposed to reflect how all of mankind will live their lives in that future better world.

Isaiah 28:6 explains that rather than stirring up strife or fighting in war, God's people will "turn back the battle at the gate." This is what God's people should be doing now. They are to be peacemakers, not warmongers. We are to proclaim peace today, not only in words but in our actions, as Isaiah 52:7 clearly shows: "How beautiful upon the mountains Are the feet of him who brings good news, Who proclaims peace ... "

When God's reign on this earth begins, that proclaimed peace will have become reality. People will not join the military to learn how to hate the enemy and how to fight in war; rather, they will be taught how to live in peace. Isaiah 2:2-4 prophesies: "Now it shall come to pass in the latter days That the mountain of the LORD'S house Shall be established on the top of the mountains, And shall be exalted above the hills; And all nations shall flow to it. Many people shall come and say, `Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, To the house of the God of Jacob; He will teach us His ways, And we shall walk in His paths.' For out of Zion shall go forth the LAW [including the law which says: "You shall not kill"], and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, And rebuke many people; They shall beat their swords into plowshares, And their spears into pruning hooks; NATION SHALL NOT LIFT UP SWORD AGAINST
 
NATION, NEITHER SHALL THEY LEARN WAR ANYMORE."

When Christ, who is called the Prince of Peace, begins His rule on this earth, He will not allow wars to be fought any more. Yes, Christ will make an END to all wars, as we read in Isaiah 9:5-7: "For every warrior's sandal from the noisy battle, And garments rolled in blood, Will be used for burning and fuel of fire. FOR unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the GOVERNMENT WILL BE UPON HIS SHOULDER. And His name will be called ... Prince of Peace. Of the INCREASE of His GOVERNMENT AND PEACE There will be no end, Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom ... From that time forward, even forever."

If we understand correctly the purpose of Christ's future Second Coming, we realize that Christ will not return to fight in war, but to END ALL wars. Psalms 46:9 states: "He makes wars CEASE to the END OF THE EARTH; He BREAKS the BOW and CUTS THE SPEAR IN TWO; He BURNS THE CHARIOT in the fire." Christ will come to scatter those who delight in war (compare Psalm 68:30).

God will not help people through the means of war. Hosea 1:7 predicts: "Yet I will have mercy on the house of Judah, Will save them by the LORD their God, And will NOT save them BY BOW, Nor by SWORD or BATTLE, By horses or horsemen." Rather, God will destroy all weapons and instruments of war, as Hosea 2:18 explains: " ... Bow and sword of battle I will shatter from the earth, To make them lie down safely."

In Zechariah 9:10, God repeats this future prophecy, as follows: "I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim And the horse from Jerusalem; The battle bow shall be cut off. He shall speak peace to the nations; His dominion shall be from sea to sea, And from the River to the ends of the earth."

Men, at that time, will listen to God and will destroy their weapons. We read in the second chapter of the book of Isaiah that they will beat their swords into plowshares. Ezekiel 39:9-10 confirms this fact: "Then those who dwell in the cities of Israel will go out and set on fire and burn the weapons, both the shields and bucklers, the bows and arrows, the javelins and spears ... They will not take wood from the field nor cut down any from the forests, because they will make fires with the weapons ... "

The Christian Duty - Today!

True Christians need to understand that they must already have

God's attitude toward peace and war, knowing that PEACE, not WAR, will be the reality of the future world under God's rule. They must lead by their good example TODAY, showing others that we can live the way to peace and avoid the way to war.

Clearly, we cannot participate in war - neither in a literal sense, nor in the sense of advocating war with our lips, or even entertaining thoughts of war. Rather, we have to bring "every thought" into captivity to the obedience of Christ (compare 2 Corinthians 10:5). That is, we must be sure that our thoughts conform to Christ's thoughts, and if we think thoughts of war, rather than peace, we must eradicate those thoughts from our minds.

This would even include the habit of watching extremely violent movies or participating in violent video games, in which war is glorified and depicted as the solution to our problems. If we are not careful, such a habit could lead to numbing our conscience to the point where killing seems normal to us. Some video interactive entertainment has been purchased and used by the military since it has been proven more effective than the military's own training programs for desensitizing the human instincts against randomly killing other human beings, including women and children. In case of a draft and an examination by the draft
 
board, those who claim to be conscientious objectors must convince the examination board that they are in fact convicted that they cannot participate and kill in war. A habit of watching extremely violent movies, depicting killings and murders just as a means of entertainment, may raise questions in the examination boards as to one's convictions.

The same is true in respect to what we say, because we understand, as Christ tells us in Matthew 12:34-37, that we will have to give account of every idle word we speak.

Rather than speaking words which advocate, endorse or support war, we are told in Proverbs 12:20 that "counselors of peace have joy." When we advocate the way of peace, then the "God of love and peace" will be with us (compare 2 Corinthians 13:11).

Proverbs 16:7 tells us: "When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." Do we believe that? Or, do we think that God's way is not practical, and we must instead do what the world has been doing for thousands of years - trying to bring about peace through war? Emphatically NO! History itself has established the fact that we can NEVER experience and enjoy true peace that way.

A Righteous War?

Christianity Today published an interesting article on October 28, 2003, proving from ancient historical records that early Christians were opposed to military service and war. The article stated (emphasis added): "The ancient church understood that war has been around as long as human beings and [war and] SIN have coexisted. It is a consistent tenet throughout the Christian tradition that WAR IS THE RESULT OF SIN. The responses to war, however, have followed two basic trains of thought: pacifism, and the idea that certain wars can be just."

The article went on to show that the very early Christian Church was preaching and practicing PACIFISM. Later, though, due to pagan influences and Christian involvement in the affairs of the state, the concept of a so-called "just war" developed.

Continuing with the article: "Pacifism is characteristic of the EARLY CENTURIES OF CHRISTIANITY like the North African apologist Tertullian (160-220 A.D.), who regularly warned Christians to DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM PAGAN CULTURE. He wrote: `How will he serve in the army even during peacetime without the sword that
 
Jesus Christ has taken away? ... We are not allowed to wear any uniform that symbolizes a sinful act' (On Idolatry 19.3). The third-century Roman Presbyter Hippolytus wrote the Apostolic Tradition, Canon 16 (ca. 215 A.D.) which opposed serving in the military as a matter of church discipline: `A soldier in lower ranks shall kill no one. If ordered to do so, he shall not obey, and he shall not take an oath. If he does not want to comply with this directive, let him be dismissed [from the church].'"

The article went on to say: "The Constantinian era brought about a change. Previously marginalized Christians were now involved in THE AFFAIRS OF STATE. Though there were many Christian soldiers before the time of Constantine, IT WASN'T UNTIL previously marginalized Christians BECAME INVOLVED IN THE AFFAIRS OF STATE that the church fathers BEGAN NUANCING THEIR OPPOSITION TO MILITARY ACTION. The issue then became how one could remain a Christian when the demands of the state required use of force to combat evil or prevent injury." As the article pointed out, this then led to the Catholic teaching of a "just war."

Augustine of Hippo (354-430) taught that war, although evil (!), was justifiable as a last resort, after peaceful options had been exhausted. A complicated body of rules and regulations was created, defining a "just war." Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274) was instrumental in that regard. Those man-made rules provide that a "just war" must be declared by a proper governmental (human) authority; that it has to be waged for a morally legitimate purpose (defined by man); that it must have the intention of correcting a wrong (defined by man); and that it must be fought in the right way; that is, civilians must not be intentionally harmed (but we all know that every war will lead to the death of civilians - the so-called "casualties of war").

Based on these ideas, the Protestant leaders of the Reformation accepted warfare. The Swiss reformer Zwingly was killed in battle!

Christ, however, did not approve the concept of a "just war" fought by man. He showed us very specifically that His disciples are NOT to participate in warfare in any manner, shape or form. If there ever has been a so-called righteous or just war, a war which would have been justified - or if there has ever been an action of defending oneself or others which would have been acceptable, if not recommended - then it would have been Peter's attempt to protect the totally innocent Jesus from the illegal arrest of the Romans and the Jews.

But when Peter drew the sword in the garden of Gethsemane and cut off the ear of the servant Malchus, Christ told him: "Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword" (Matthew 26:52).

We find a similar warning and repetition of Christ's statement to Peter in Revelation 13:10, where we read: "He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is [required] the patience and the faith of the saints [so that they do not kill with the sword in the face of persecution, but faithfully rely on God to fight their battles for them]."

Let us also remember the incident, when James and John were willing to wipe out the Samaritans who had refused to grant shelter to Christ and to them. We read in Luke 9:54-56: "And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, `Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?' But He turned and rebuked them and said, `You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men's lives but to save them.' And they went to another village."

The Spirit of Satan

The spirit that James and John were following at that moment was the spirit of Satan. Satan is a destroyer, especially through the means of war, as Revelation 9:11 reveals. There, a warring army is described as being led by Satan, "the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon." The word Abbadon means, "Destruction," and the word Apollyon means, "Destroyer."

While Christ said that He did not come to destroy men's lives, Satan is the one who is anxious to destroy as many human lives as he possibly can.

Satan is also called, in John 8:44, a "murderer from the beginning." In the Greek, the word for "murderer" is "anthropoktonos." It literally means, "mankiller" or "manslayer." The same Greek word is used in 1 John 3:15: "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer (in Greek, "anthropoktonos"), and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."

Therefore, whoever kills his neighbor, whether in times of peace or in times of war, is described in the Bible as a "manslayer" or "murderer," and such a person does not have eternal life abiding in him.

"My Servants Would Fight ... "

When Christ was asked to defend Himself before Pilate, He told him: "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here" (John 18:36).

We need to take note of several points Christ brings out in this passage: First, Christ told Pilate that His Kingdom was not of this world, and that therefore, His servants would not fight in this world. Some have claimed that Christ was referring to His human disciples, when He talked about His servants. Even if that were true, they still would not be permitted to fight in war today, as Christ's rule over this world is still future.

In addition, let us notice that Christ said that IF His kingdom were of this world, His servants would fight " ... so that I should not be delivered to the Jews."

This was a statement that Christ made to Pilate at that time. He said, in effect: If My Kingdom were of this world, that is, if I had come at that time to establish the Kingdom of God on this earth, then My servants would fight against those who try to prevent the Kingdom of God from being established.

WHO WERE the servants Christ was talking about? Surely not His few human disciples who were with Him at that time! They would not have been a match for the Roman army.

To whom then is Christ referring?

Matthew 26:53 provides us with the answer from Christ's own lips, directed at Peter who tried to fight for Him: "Or do you think that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He will provide Me with more than twelve legions of angels [A Roman legion consisted of 5,000 soldiers. Twelve legions of angels would then consist of 60,000 angels]?"

When Christ talked about His servants who would not allow Him to be arrested, if He had come at that time to set up the Kingdom of God, He was referring to more than twelve legions of angels - who were and are much more powerful than all of man's armies combined. He was not talking about His human disciples. He had told them earlier that He did not call them servants anymore, but friends, as He had revealed His Will to them (compare John 15:15).

In effect, what Christ was telling Pilate in John 18:36 was simply

this: "If I had come to establish My Kingdom, My servants, the angels of My Father, would not allow Me to be captured and put to death." But, as we understand, Christ's First Coming was not for the purpose of establishing the Kingdom of God on this earth; rather, one of its purposes was for Christ to DIE for you and me! But His Second Coming will be exactly for the purpose of establishing God's Kingdom on this earth! And so we find that the angels will fight for and with the returning Christ against those who will oppose Him at that time. Revelation 19:14, 21 states: "And the armies in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses ... And the rest were killed with the sword which proceeded from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse." A description of that battle can also be found in Zechariah 14:3-4, 12-15.

Christ's statements in John 18:36 do not provide any justification for His human followers to fight in war. The Biblical teaching is very clear - a Christian who wants to follow Christ and His teachings, will not fight in war.

True Christians Don't Fight

2 Corinthians 10:3-5 explains: "For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war ACCORDING TO THE FLESH. For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God ... "

Paul is describing here a spiritual warfare against the evil forces of the demon world, not a carnal warfare against other human beings. Note Ephesians 6:11-12: "Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places."

Christians Refused to Fight

By no stretch of the imagination can one read those clear passages and still conclude that Christ or Paul permitted Christians to fight in the wars of this world. And so, those who have followed the plain teachings of the New Testament have, throughout history, refused to participate in war, as previously pointed out. Please note these additional quotes:

Professor Rossi wrote in Conscience and Liberty (emphasis added): "The Christians of the first century ... were decisively against any form of war. In the middle of the second century, the Christian Philosopher Justin declared to his pagan readers, `And we, who once delighted in war, in murdering each other and in all kinds of sins, we have all over the world changed our weapons into instruments of peace ... '"

Edward Gibbon wrote in "The Triumph of Christendom in the Roman Empire," on page 41, about the early Church: " ... they refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defense of the empire."

In "Of the Crown," Tertullian (A.D. 150-225) wrote: "I think we must first inquire whether warfare is proper at all for Christians ... Shall it be held lawful to make an occupation of the sword, when the Lord proclaims that he who uses the sword shall perish by the sword?"

Tertullian is also quoted as saying: "The divine banner and the human banner do not go together, nor the standard of Christ and the standard of the devil. Only without the sword can the Christian wage war: for the Lord has abolished the sword."

In the September/October 1985 edition of the magazine, "Liberty," the following statements were made (emphasis added): "Until the end of the second century, the church appeared to be staunchly pacifist. No records exist of any Christian soldier prior to A.D. 170. A pagan named Celsius in A.D. 173 chastised Christians for their pacifism: `If all men were to do the same as you, there would be nothing to prevent the king from being left in utter solitude and desertion, and the forces of the empire would fall into the hands of the wildest and most lawless barbarians.' Justyn Martyr, describing the early church, wrote: `We who formerly murdered one another now not only do not make war upon our enemies, but we gladly die confessing Christ ... [Justin Martyr (A.D.100-165) also said: "We ourselves were well conversant with war, murder and everything evil, but all of us throughout the whole wide earth have traded in our weapons of war. We have exchanged our swords for plowshares, our spears for farm tools."] After A.D. 170, however, references to Christian soldiers appear ... Worldly paganism saturated religion, and the church succumbed to its militaristic influence ... Christians, alienated from the Roman Government by persecution, soon became the
 
Roman Government. In A.D. 314, the Council of Arles declared that Christians could officially join the army, and by A.D. 416 ONLY Christians could join. Emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity helped turn Christian plowshares into swords ... "

The Paulicians, who lived about 550 A.D., preached against participating in war. So did the Waldenses in the 12^th and 13^th centuries. Later, some Waldenses decided that they could fight in war, while others refused to do so. One Waldensian wrote in 1655: "The Christians who allegedly fight battle for God and religion cannot justify their acts, because they do something which God did not command, yes, which Christ prohibited."

The article in Liberty continued: "During the Reformation and the centuries following, Mennonites, Hussites, Quakers, the Brethren, and Jehovah's Witnesses refused to take part in war. The larger Protestant bodies justified warfare as long as they were able to rationalize the justness of each conflict. The Kaiser's armies marched `for God, the Kaiser, and the Fatherland,' while across the English Channel, Reverend Winnington-Ingram, the bishop of London, exhorted young Englishmen to `kill Germans ... to kill the good and the bad, to kill the young and the old, to kill those who have shown kindness to our wounded ... As I have said a thousand times, I look upon it as a war of purity.'"

The record of history is clear. Those who followed the clear teaching of Jesus Christ regarding peace and war REFUSED both to fight and to join the military.

In the April 23, 1865 issue of the Church of God publication, "Hope of Israel," it was stated: "We thank God that President Lincoln ... did cause to be made such laws as would deliver God's saints from participating in war." In April 1917, Andrew Dugger, president of the Church of God (Seventh Day), met with President Wilson and received exemption for Church members from combatant service. During the Korean and Vietnam wars, Herbert W. Armstrong of the Worldwide Church of God petitioned the government to recognize Church members as having conscientious objector status.

True Christians will not participate in war, nor will they advocate war! Anyone who advocates going to war bears a grave responsibility. If young people who follow such advice are killed in war, or if they kill others, including innocent civilians, widows and children (who may even be members of a church who kill young people from the same church), and once God, the Judge of us all, declares such warfare to be sinful, He will also hold those responsible who have advocated the same.

Notice the following excerpts from a poem that a Mennonite wrote in 1873. This poem entitled, "Christianity Requires Peace," reads:

"How can men be so blind in this

Clear peaceful gospel light,

As to believe and say, It is

The Christian's legal right

To forge the instruments of carnal strife,

And learn the fiendish art of taking life!

With sword and gun join in the mad affray

To kill his fellow men in every way!

May God save us from this sight.

"Come, blessed time, seen from afar

By holy seers of old,

When none shall sanction deeds of war

Within the Christian fold.

Oh, when shall appear the glorious day,

When carnage and strife shall have passed away?

When all men on earth love the Prince of Peace,

And obey his gospel, then wars will cease -

`Tis the hope we firmly hold."

The New Testament teachings on war forbid Christians to participate in war, as the spirit of war is the spirit of murder, and it is therefore clearly in total opposition to Christ's teachings reflected, for instance, in the Sermon on the Mount. In the future, the way of war will not be taught anymore. So then, it behooves us today to teach and live God's way of peace, not Satan's way of war. Christ told Peter that whoever takes up the sword, shall perish by it. He rebuked the "sons of thunder" - James and John - for their desire to destroy the Samaritans, asking them if they did not realize whose spirit they were following at that time. John later became known, however, as an "apostle of love."

Satan Invents War

Let us focus a little bit more on that spirit - the spirit of this world that is responsible for men's miseries, sufferings, killings and wars. We
 
already saw from the letter of James that wars come from lusts that fight in our minds. But where do those lusts come from?

Once we fully understand who is the originator of war, we can also clearly see why we must not participate in war.

We read in the book of Genesis that God, in the beginning, created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1:1). When this happened, God's angels shouted for joy because this original peaceful creation was full of majesty, beauty and splendor (compare Job 38:4-7).

The Bible also reveals to us that a mighty and powerful spirit being, called Lucifer, was taught and trained by God at His very throne in heaven (compare Isaiah 14:12; Ezekiel 28:14-15), to rule over the earth. Not being satisfied with what God had given him, he rebelled against God! He tried to knock God off His heavenly throne - to replace God and become "like Him," or, perhaps, even become God Himself. His coup failed, and he was thrown back to this earth, together with about one-third of all of the angels that he had swayed to his way of thinking (Ezekiel 28:16; Isaiah 14:13-15; Revelation 12:3-4; Luke 10:18). Lucifer's name was changed to Satan (Revelation 12:9), and his angels became known as demons. They are also known as evil or familiar spirits.

This ANGELIC rebellion was the first recorded battle, or war, in the history of creation! Satan - then called Lucifer - was the originator. This war ended in total destruction and the earth became void and empty - filled with death, decay and darkness. (Genesis 1:2, correctly translated from the Hebrew, reads: "The earth BECAME without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep." For more information, please read our free booklet, "The Theory of Evolution - A Fairy Tale for Adults?")

This very first war was premeditated! Yes, Lucifer had prepared his rebellion very carefully! We don't know how long it took Lucifer after feelings of lust, greed, envy and pride had begun to fill his mind, before he began to work on the angels under his command, bombarding them with his war propaganda, until they, too, were willing to follow their leader in the first violent attack against other beings. But we can be sure that it was a well thought out plan to overthrow the Creator!

Satan invented war and he is still responsible for war today. He sustains that warring spirit today by provoking nations to come against each other in wars, having absolutely no care for the tremendous loss of
 
human life and suffering. He also provokes the minds of people with the spirit of hatred and contentiousness on an individual level. True to form, he will once again - in the near future - become the originator of a universal war, this time on this earth. We also know, from prophecy, that Satan will fight another spiritual war against God and the holy angels just prior to the return of Christ. Revelation 12:7-9 describes that war.

The Bible records in verse 13 of Revelation 12 that Satan will again be thrown back to this earth and will be filled with tremendous, uncontrolled wrath and anger! (In fact, there are some indications that this event might have already taken place.) In that frame of mind, he will influence people to fight the most violent and vicious war ever fought by humans on this planet! It will be so devastating that all of mankind will surely perish unless God intervenes at the last minute, so to speak, to stop such senseless fighting. Only the returning Jesus Christ - King of kings and Lord of lords - will be able to stop Satan and prevent the total annihilation of mankind (compare Matthew 24:21-22).

Even though God will swiftly and supernaturally intervene at that time and make a stop to that war, mankind will still, at the beginning of Christ's rule here on earth, be eager to fight, motivated by their own lusts which have become part of their Satan-inspired nature. We read in Ezekiel 38 that peoples from the east will attempt to overthrow the peaceful nations of Israel. This will happen at the very beginning of the "Millennium" - a period of 1,000 years when God will rule on this earth and Satan will be bound, unable to deceive the nations anymore. These peoples will not have rid themselves of their lust to fight and murder, which they acquired from Satan. Yes, it will take a while, even in the Millennium, until physical man will be able to overcome his Satan-inspired human nature and replace it, gradually, with God's nature.

But lo and behold, even after that event which occurs at the BEGINNING of the Millennium, the Bible describes yet another future war that will be fought when the "thousand years have expired" (Revelation 20:7). This war will be fought before the "Great White Throne Judgment" period begins, which is mentioned in Revelation 20:11-12. (For more information regarding this "Great White Throne Judgment," please read our free booklet, "God's Commanded Holy Days.") Remember, Satan had been thrown in prison so that, as we read in Revelation
 
20:3, he could "deceive the nations no more." And what was, and is, and will be Satan's biggest deception?

Revelation 20:7-10 provides us with the answer to this all-important question: "Now when the thousand years have expired, Satan will be released from his prison and will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea. They went up on the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. And fire came down from God out of heaven and devoured them. The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone ... "

We see that man, under the influence and deception of Satan, will be willing to fight again in war. Man who wants to kill in war today, or thinks that war will solve our problems, is deceived by Satan. After all, we read that Satan has deceived the whole world (Revelation 12:9).

Man NEVER needs to fight in war. We see that in that very last future war, involving humans, God will do the fighting for His human servants, by devouring the enemy through fire. That will be the right time for God to intervene and destroy the enemy, but it was not the right time or occasion when James and John asked for fire to come down from heaven - essentially calling on God to devour the Samaritans. We must leave all fighting to God. It is not our prerogative or responsibility, and if we think and act differently than what God tells us, we are playing right into the deceptive hand of Satan.

After that final war or "battle" recorded in Revelation 20:7-11, there will never be another war! Can you comprehend a world WITHOUT WAR? A world that is full of PEACE and HARMONY? Revelation 21:4 predicts: "And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away."

Why Did Ancient Israel Fight?

All well and good, you might say. But, if war is un-Christian, then why did ancient Israel fight and kill? Good question! And here are a few more questions that warrant Biblical answers! Why did God permit Israel to fight in war? Why did God sometimes even order Israel to fight? If it is always a sin for man to fight in war, did David - a man after
 
God's own heart - sin when he fought in war? Did Moses sin when he ordered Israel to fight against Amalek?

Some might answer that it was all right for people in the Old Testament to fight, because God was their Commander. Somehow Israel was justified because they lived under some kind of a different administration. But this explanation CANNOT be correct, and, in fact, shows a total misunderstanding of the character and purpose of God and His law!

God is the same throughout ETERNITY - yesterday, today, and forever. His character, His values, His way of thinking did not, and do not change! He is not a respecter of persons. If it is sin for US today to fight and kill - which it is - it was likewise sin for those in Old Testament times to fight and kill. Most of those who fought in Old Testament times were carnal - unconverted - like most people are today. Nevertheless, as Christ told Peter, everyone who kills in war must be killed in war, unless he comes to repentance and obtains forgiveness of his sins. Killing in war is one of those sins that a person must repent of and obtain forgiveness for.

But some in the Old Testament, like David, Moses and Joshua, who did fight and kill in war, were converted. They had God's Holy Spirit! They were living under the terms and conditions of the New Covenant, as we do today. Again, since it is wrong for us to kill in war, it must have been wrong for David, Moses and Joshua to kill in war; otherwise, God would NOT be the same! He would have different standards and laws for different people, in effect, being a respecter of persons - which would be against His own written Word, the Bible!

Some say, David, Moses and Joshua were justified to kill because God ordered them to kill. We will look into all of these arguments, but let us state here that Moses and David both killed people in some wars that were NOT commanded by God. We do not read, for example, that God commanded David to kill 200 Philistines. Rather, Saul - not God - asked David to kill 100 Philistines in exchange for becoming his son-in-law, and David responded by killing 200 Philistines (1 Samuel 18:25-27). Was that killing justified? If not, where do you draw the line? As we will see, David's killing in war was not in any way justified - not under any circumstances!

Let us go back, in our Old Testament survey, to the very first war that ancient Israel fought, and let us see how the nation of Israel decided to become a war-waging nation.

How Israel Became a Warring Nation

As mentioned before, very early in the recent history of the Church of God, Herbert W. Armstrong wrote a booklet, in 1967, entitled "Military Service and War." In the booklet, he explains HOW Israel decided to go to war, and WHY God used Israel, even sometimes ordering them to fight.

We begin quoting from pages 24-26 of the booklet (emphasis in the original): "Right here, before they reached Mt. Sinai - before they heard God's own great voice thundering His Ten Commandments - God demonstrated the pattern He would follow in preserving His people from having to undergo military service, or fighting in war, or taking human life!... `And Moses said unto the people, Fear ye not, stand still, and see the salvation of the Eternal, which HE WILL SHOW YOU today. ... The Eternal shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace' [Exodus 14:13-14]. The Israelites were not to fight - but STAND STILL! They were to see God save them from Pharaoh's ARMY. God was going to SHOW THEM that He would fight their wars for them! They were to remain at PEACE!"

Mr. Armstrong goes on to explain that Israel's faith in God's help was only of a short duration. They soon began to doubt when they came to Marah and only found bitter water (Exodus 15:24). They also complained in the wilderness because of lack of food (Exodus 16:2-3). Also, when in Rephidim, they lost faith, tempting God (Exodus 17:1-2).

Continuing with Mr. Armstrong's booklet, on pages 29-32: "Now we come to the CRUCIAL INCIDENT that explains WHY Israel went to war. Regularly they had been grumbling, complaining, accusing, disobeying, LOSING FAITH - in face of constant MIRACLES from God. Now, again, as God performed another miracle, causing water to gush forth out of a rock, the people DOUBTED that God was with them. `... they tempted the ETERNAL, saying, "Is the ETERNAL among us, or not?"' (Exodus 17:7).

"Now consider what had happened. Repeatedly, God had given these people awe-inspiring and miraculous demonstrations of His intention to fight the battles for them... After all of this OVERWHELMING PROOF, these people DOUBTED God's faithfulness - DOUBTED His power - even DOUBTED His very existence. They disobeyed. They went the way of SIN! In effect, they had their own `God is dead' movement!...
 
[A]t this juncture, Amalek, a Gentile king, came against the Israelites in great strength with an invading army. This time God ALLOWED the Israelites to write the lesson of experience. He allowed them to SIN. God does not forcibly prevent humans from sinning.

"Moses, at the end of his patience trying to induce these stubborn, rebellious people to believe in and TRUST God, said to Joshua, `Choose us out men, and go out, FIGHT with Amalek' (Exodus 17:9). Lacking the faith to trust God for their protection, Moses feared they would be slaughtered. Although Moses weakened and gave the order of WAR, it was THE PEOPLE themselves who actually MADE THE DECISION for war, by their utter lack of reliance on God. It was altogether unnecessary for these Israelites to arm themselves and wage WAR. It was WRONG! It was SIN. But God let the decision be theirs ... This incident was the turning point... They had experienced a taste of war. They could have - should have - turned from it, afterward, and relied on God instead of their own power. But they didn't... By their continuous disbelief, lack of reliance on GOD, and reliance only on PHYSICAL WARFARE, they made the DECISION to be, like all the nations of the earth, a WARRING NATION!"

On page 33, Mr. Armstrong begins to address the question why God ordered the Israelites at times to wage war: "These descendants of Abraham had made their decision to be a fighting, war-waging nation. That decision was theirs to make. And since they had made it..., God gave orders for them to do what fighting - and killing - was necessary to accomplish God's PURPOSE of putting them in the land of Promise! But that did not make war RIGHT. Whether to DO right or wrong - that is MAN'S decision! These Israelites did not need to fight! So it was BECAUSE of Israel's faithlessness and disobedience that God ALLOWED them to SIN by taking up arms. And therefore God used them as His instruments in driving out the nations illegally in their land. Even at that later date the Israelites could have REPENTED, changed their decision, and trusted God to fight their battles for them... Having committed the sin of DOUBT, these Israelites proceeded to commit the SIN OF FIGHTING - of WAR!"

Continuing on page 36: "But one may ask this question: If war is wrong - if it is SIN - if it is contrary to God's WAY for man, then WHY did God, on occasion, actually order the Israelites to go to war and kill?
 
Consider these TWO FACTS:

"1) Israel had sinned in a) not TRUSTING God to do the fighting for them; and b) in disobeying God's Commandment against war. They had CHOSEN to be a war-waging nation. The decision was WRONG. Yet God compels man to decide WHETHER to sin. If he does, he brings on himself the penalty. THE FACT, therefore, must be realized that Israel REFUSED TO RELY ON GOD TO DO THE FIGHTING; and CHOSE to be a warring nation.

"2) God's PURPOSE must stand, regardless of what men do. It was God's PURPOSE to install Israel in, and to drive certain people out of God's holy land, which He had PROMISED to the children of Abraham, Isaac and Israel... Since Israel was not going to rely on GOD to drive out these nations, but elected to be a WAR-making nation, God used them to accomplish His PURPOSE... He ordered them to do what was required to make HIS PURPOSE stand!"

There are some in certain Church of God organizations today, who justify going to and participating in war, or who claim that ancient Israel did NOT sin when they fought in war. They are wrong, as they do not understand the character of God, nor the intent and purpose of God's Law, the Ten Commandments. Let us quote Mr. Armstrong's alarming and challenging words from page 38 of his booklet:

"The divine GIVER of human life has the right to take the lives He gave. They belong to HIM. But for any human, or nation, of his or its own volition, on his or its own initiative, to take human life is SIN. The life he takes is not his - but GOD'S! He not only commits murder - he also STEALS or takes what is GOD'S. Even his own life belongs to God. The suicide takes a human life that belongs to God!

"When God has made it one of the ten basic SINS for man to take human life - and made it unnecessary for man to go to war by promising to take care of the wars Himself supernaturally, then the nation which CHOOSES to be a WAR-waging nation has committed SIN. And every individual who enters its military organization is committing SIN.

"Israel had made that decision. Other nations, too - all had made it. Since the nations of this world do fight, God allows them to commit this SIN. Yet, to carry out HIS PURPOSE, God Himself determines the
 
outcome of wars. And since Israel already had rejected HIM as its war-making Force, He even ordered them to fulfill HIS PURPOSE, which must be accomplished! But that did not whitewash Israel from having deliberately rebelled and chosen to fight in war in violation of GOD'S WAY."

Yes, ancient Israel sinned when they went to war. THEY DECIDED to do this, rather than waiting for God's counsel (compare Psalm 106:7-15, especially verse 13). And when man makes decisions on his own, without asking for God's counsel, he is usually wrong (Compare, for another example, Joshua 9:14). God, the Author of peace, does not want human beings to fight in war. When Christ returns, He will restore peace to this earth - a time when "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, Neither shall they learn war anymore" (Isaiah 2:4).

Man will live a way of peace as originally intended by God. Today, we are Christ's ambassadors of that future way. We are not to follow the sinful pattern of the ancient Israelites who rebelled against God's promises and clear commands. Man has chosen to disobey God and to sin by going to war. God, who is the same yesterday, today and forever, condemns, and has ALWAYS condemned, human warfare. We are to pray for our enemies and to do good to them, rather than fighting against them and avenging ourselves. We are to leave "vengeance" to God (Romans 12:19-20). The Biblical teaching on this subject is clear and consistent.

We have read about the incident when God fought for Israel and destroyed the Egyptian army so that Israel did not have to fight. Here are some additional examples in the Bible where God manifested His great power, showing that man does not have to fight in war at all, if he would only rely on God for help.

King Jehoshaphat Did Not Need to Fight

The Bible records in 2 Chronicles 20:1-30 an incident where King Jehoshaphat fully and totally relied on God's help. As a consequence, he did not have to fight. We read in verse 4 that, in the face of an imminent attack from their enemies, the king and all the people "gathered together to ask help from the LORD; and from all the cities of Judah they came to seek the LORD." In verse 12, the king admits that he is helpless, "nor do we know what to do, but our eyes are upon You." Jahaziel is inspired to respond, "Do not be afraid nor dismayed because

of this great multitude, for the battle is NOT yours, BUT God's" (verse 15). The king was also told that he would "not need to fight in this battle. Position yourselves, stand still and see the salvation of the LORD" (verse 17).

Since the king and the people had the required faith in God's mighty power, "the LORD set ambushes against the people of Ammon, Moab, and Mount Seir, who had come against Judah; and they were defeated. For the people of Ammon and Moab stood up against the inhabitants of Mount Seir to utterly kill and destroy them. And when they had made an end of the inhabitants of Seir, they helped to destroy one another. So when Judah came to a place overlooking the wilderness, they looked toward the multitude; and there were dead bodies, fallen on the earth. No one had escaped ... And the fear of God was on all the kingdoms of those countries when they heard that the LORD had fought against the enemies of Israel. Then the realm of Jehoshaphat was quiet, for his God gave him rest all around" (verses 22-24, 29-30).

King Hezekiah Did Not Need to Fight

Another powerful example of God's awesome intervention - in this case, on behalf of King Hezekiah and His people - can be found in 2 Chronicles 32. We read in verses 20-22 that, after Hezekiah's "deeds of faithfulness" (verse 1), the king of Assyria proceeded to besiege Jerusalem. But due to faith in God on the part of the king and the prophet Isaiah (verse 20), "the LORD sent an angel who cut down every mighty man of valor, leader, and captain in the camp of the king of Assyria. So he returned shamefaced to his own land ... Thus the LORD saved Hezekiah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem from the hand of ... the king of Assyria" (verses 21-22).

Think about what could be accomplished today if those who claim to be followers of the teachings of Jesus Christ would turn to God with a repentant heart and soul, and pray to God for protection and help, fully relying on Him and trusting in Him to do their fighting for them. Instead, we have turned so far away from the Eternal God - our Maker and Sustainer - that such a thought sounds preposterous! God has not changed, but He will not fight our battles if we don't have faith in Him, CHOOSING rather to rely on ourselves.

God Fought For Israel

Let us return to the example of the ancient Israelites. We have seen that God showed them, when He brought them out of the land of Egypt, that He would fight for them. They did not have to fight. It was never God's desire that Israel should fight. Notice what He told the Israelites: "I will send My fear before you, I will cause confusion among all the people to whom you come, and will make all your enemies turn their backs to you. And I will send hornets before you, which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite from before you" (Exodus 23:27-28).

Later, Moses reminded the Israelites of God's intent to drive out the enemies through hornets (Deuteronomy 7:20), and Joshua 24:12 reports that this was EXACTLY what God did: "I sent the hornet before you which drove them out from before you, also the two kings of the Amorites, BUT NOT WITH YOUR SWORD OR WITH YOUR BOW."

Even after Israel had decided to become a war-waging nation, God made it very clear that it was not because of the sword that Israel occupied the land. God wanted the Israelites to understand - and He wants us to understand today - how useless and wrong war is! It was GOD - and God alone - who gave them the Promised Land! God says that He did NOT give it to them by their sword.

Psalm 44:3, 6-8 explains: "For they did NOT gain possession of the land by their own sword, Nor did their own arm save them; But it was Your right hand, Your arm, and the light of Your countenance ... For I will not trust in my bow, Nor shall my sword save me. But You have saved us from our enemies, And have put to shame those who hated us. In God we boast all day long, And praise Your name
forever."

Even though Israel had decided to fight in war, it was still GOD who did the "main fighting." We read, for example, in Joshua 10:11, 14: "And it happened, as they fled before Israel and were on the descent of Beth Horon, that the LORD cast down large hailstones from heaven on them as far as Azekah, and they died. There were more who died from the hailstones than the children of Israel killed with the sword ... the LORD fought for Israel."

God's Viewpoint On War

We Christians are to align our thoughts and actions with what God tells us in His Word. So then, let us review some additional passages in the Old Testament that show God's viewpoint when it comes to the human desire and endeavor to fight in war. And let us ask ourselves: Is that our viewpoint also?

Isaiah 31:1-5 states: "Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help, And rely on horses, Who trust in chariots because they are many, And in horsemen because they are very strong, But who do not look to the Holy One of Israel, Nor seek the LORD! ... Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; And their horses are flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD stretches out His hand, Both he who helps will fall, And he who is helped will fall down; They all will perish together ... the LORD of hosts will come down To fight for Mount Zion and for its hill. Like birds flying about, So will the LORD of hosts defend Jerusalem ... "

Human warfare will not prevail against God and His Will. And God does not need us to fight for Him, either. Notice Psalm 37:11, 14-15: "But the meek shall inherit the earth, And shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace ... The wicked have drawn the sword And have bent their bow, To cast down the poor and needy, To slay those who are of upright conduct. Their sword shall enter their own heart, And their bows shall be broken."

Let us also take note of the inspired words of Abner in 2 Samuel. 2:26: "Shall the sword devour forever? Do you not know that it will be bitter in the latter end?"

Why Did King David Fight?

But, what about King David? He fought in war, yet he was called a man after God's own heart. Therefore, as the argument goes, the fact that David fought must have been pleasing to God - in other words, it was not wrong for David to fight. Is that a right conclusion?

Herbert W. Armstrong addressed this issue as follows, on pages 38 and 39 of his booklet, "Military Service and War": "God called David a man after His own heart. David was a warrior. David killed many people. As King, he waged WAR. But that did not make war right. God held David accountable for this bloodguiltiness ... David was a `man after God's own heart' NOT because of his wars, his fighting, his killing. God PUNISHED him for that!"

But how can this be right?

We need to realize that David grew up in a nation that was accustomed to fighting in war. It seems that no one questioned the practice of war. And so we find that David was described as a "man of war" while he was still a very young lad (compare 1 Samuel 16:18). When King Saul asked him to kill 100 Philistines as "dowry" to become his son-in-law, David killed 200 Philistines (compare 1 Samuel 18:25-27). Something in David's nature enjoyed fighting in war. Some of us have that kind of nature, too. And as David did, we too, have grown up in an environment where it is "clear," "manifest," "self-evident," that one "HAS" to fight in war. Notice how David's time and environment was described in 2 Samuel 11:1: "It happened in the spring of the year, at the time when kings go out to battle ... "

David, then, had to learn from God that war was wrong and without purpose.

First of all, many of the wars that David fought were direct
 
PUNISHMENT for his murder of Uriah and his adultery with Bathsheba, as 2 Samuel 12:9-10 clearly reveals.

The prophet Nathan uttered the following words of God to David: "Why have you despised the commandment of the LORD, to do evil in His sight? You have killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword [by ordering the commander Joab to forsake him in Israel's battle with the Ammonites]; you have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the people of Ammon. Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me, and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife."

Can we see that Christ's words about taking the sword and perishing by it, were already in effect in David's time? David took the sword and had Uriah killed, and so the sword would not depart from David's house.

David Not Allowed to Build a Temple

We read very clearly in the Bible that David was PUNISHED by God because he fought in war and because he was willing to fight. For instance, 1 Chronicles 22:6-10 reports to us David's own words to his son Solomon, explaining why God did not allow David to build Him a temple: "Then he called for his son Solomon, and charged him to build a house for the LORD God of Israel. And David said to Solomon: `My son, as for me, it was in my mind to build a house to the name of the LORD my God; but the word of the LORD came to me, saying, "You have shed much blood and have made great wars; you shall not build a house for My name, because you have shed much blood on the earth in My sight. Behold, a son shall be born to you, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies all around. His name shall be Solomon, for I will give peace and quietness to Israel in his days. He shall build a house for My name, and he shall be My son, and I will be his Father; and I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel forever.'"

David was not allowed to build the temple because he had shed MUCH blood and had made GREAT wars.

Some have said, this passage really only means that the temple should be erected by a man of peace, rather than a man of war, but it does not mean that it was wrong for David to fight in war. But we need to realize
 
that God said, in effect: David is not allowed to build Me this house, because he has shed much blood on the earth. God did not want His temple to be associated with war, with the shedding of blood. WHY would this be the case, if it is perfectly all right for humans to fight and kill in war?

The obvious answer is that it is NOT perfectly all right to do so. David told the people later, in 1 Chronicles 28:2-3, why God did not want him to build the temple: "Then King David rose to his feet and said, `Hear me, my brethren and my people: I had it in my heart to build a house of rest for the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and for the footstool of our God, and had made preparations to build it. But God said to me, "You shall not build a house for My name, because you have been a man of war and have shed blood."'"

David was not allowed to build God a temple because, as he himself said, he had been a man of war and he had shed blood. We don't read here that David had shed much blood. It only says, that he had shed blood. Whether he had shed much blood or just a little blood was immaterial to God.

Some have argued that David was not allowed to build the temple because he engaged in offensive wars, not only in defensive wars. Again, in God's eyes, the kind of warfare was immaterial. We read Solomon's testimony in 1 Kings 5:2-5: "Then Solomon sent to Hiram, saying: You know how my father David could not build a house for the name of the LORD his God because of the wars which were fought against him on every side, until the LORD put his foes under the soles of his feet. But now the LORD my God has given me rest on every side; there is neither adversary nor evil
occurrence. And behold, I propose to build a house for the name of the LORD my God, as the LORD spoke to my father David, saying, `Your son, whom I will set on your throne in your place, he shall build the house for My name.'"

David could not build God a house because of the wars fought against him. Even the fact that David defended himself against those who were attacking him, thereby shedding blood, was reason enough for God to prohibit him from building the temple. THAT fact should really make us think, especially in light of James 5:6: " ... you have murdered the just; he does not resist you."

David Numbers His Army

Even though David understood that God did not allow him to build the temple because of his past wars, he decided once again, at the very end of his life, to commit another foolish act that was associated with his desire to still fight in war. We are referring here to David's census of his people, Israel and Judah.

From Biblical chronology, we are able to determine that this census took place AFTER God told David that he was not allowed to build the temple. Although David made certain preparations for the building of the temple, following the census (compare 1 Chronicles 21 and 22), it is apparent that David knew by then that, and why, he could not build the temple (1 Chronicles 22:7-8; 1 Chronicles 28:2-3).

God's punishment for David taking a census of his people was severe.

The Bible includes two accounts of this episode. One account has been recorded in 2 Samuel 24. We read in verse 1: "Again the anger of the LORD was aroused against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, `Go, number Israel and Judah.'"

In the parallel account in 1 Chronicles 21:1, we are told that "Satan stood up against Israel, and moved David to number Israel."

Since the Bible does not contradict itself, we must read both passages together, to harmonize the accounts. Therefore, it was actually Satan who directly influenced David to number his army, but God allowed it, as He was angry with Israel. Although Joab objected, David insisted that his order be obeyed. We read in 2 Samuel 24:8-9: "So when they had gone through all the land, they came to Jerusalem at the end of nine months and twenty days. Then Joab gave the sum of the number of the people to the king. And there were in Israel eight hundred thousand valiant men who drew the sword, and the men of Judah were five hundred thousand men."

We now read the remarkable reaction of David, in verse 10: "And David's heart condemned him after he had numbered the people. So David said to the LORD, `I have sinned greatly in what I have done; but now, I pray, O LORD, take away the iniquity of Your servant, for I have done very foolishly.'"

What was David's great sin and iniquity? In what way had he acted very foolishly?

The context shows that David wanted to know how many men he
 
had who could carry a sword. He was either willing to begin a war, or he wanted to know how many soldiers he had to defend himself in a war. In either case, David considered his action later as iniquity and foolishness, and God agreed with him. He sent the prophet Gad, David's seer, to David, offering him three different predicaments as punishment for his sin. David chose a "three days' plague" (2 Samuel 24:13-14), and so "the LORD sent a plague upon Israel from the morning till the appointed time. From Dan to Beersheba seventy thousand men of the people died ... Then David spoke to the LORD when he saw the angel who was striking the people, and said, `Surely I have sinned, and I have done wickedly; but these sheep, what have they done? Let Your hand, I pray, be against me and against my father's house'" (verses 15-17).

The parallel account in 1 Chronicles 21 gives additional interesting details. We read in verse 16: "Then David lifted his eyes and saw the angel of the LORD standing between earth and heaven, having in his hand a drawn sword stretched out over Jerusalem."

After David had prayed to God to stop the plague, " ... the LORD commanded the angel, and he returned his sword to its sheath ... But David ... was afraid of the sword of the angel of the LORD" (verses 27, 30).

Why does the account emphasize three times that God sent an angel with a drawn sword to plague Israel? David, who was willing to take the sword in order to fight in war, saw an angel of God who was killing his people ("his sheep") with the sword. David simply saw the law in action that Christ later revealed to Peter: " ... for all who take the sword will perish by the sword" (Matthew 26:52; compare, too, 1 Chronicles 27:24).

Many innocent people are likewise bound to die in war. That is one important reason why human war is so wrong - so useless - so ungodly.

But let us ask again, Didn't God at times even command certain people, including David, to go to war? Yes, He did, only because mankind had already decided that they wanted to fight in war, trying to solve their problems through the means of war. MAN JUST DOES NOT KNOW THE WAY TO PEACE! At times, David even asked God whether he should fight or not, and God told him to fight (compare 1 Samuel 23:1-4). However, David did not ask the question whether war in general was wrong. It was rather always the issue, whether or not he should fight a particular battle.

 
When David admitted at the end of his life, after having numbered his people, that he had sinned and acted foolishly, it appears that he finally understood that fighting in war IS wrong. But he did NOT have this understanding at the very beginning of his life. Sometimes it takes a long time - maybe a whole lifetime - before God's disciples come to the perfect understanding on a given issue, including the issue of war and peace, and what constitutes killing, which is a transgression of God's Law, the Ten Commandments.

Warriors Had to "De-Sin" Themselves

Let us remember that it was never God's purpose that man should fight in war! We have already seen many passages in the Bible that make this fact very clear. Additional proof can be found when considering what the Israelites had to do AFTER they had fought in war. We read in Numbers 31:19-24: "`And as for you, remain outside the camp seven days; whoever has killed any person, and whoever has touched any slain, purify yourselves and your captives on the third day and on the seventh day. Purify every garment ... ' Then Eleazar the priest said to the men of war who had gone to the battle, `This is the ordinance of the law which the LORD commanded Moses: " ... And you shall wash your clothes on the seventh day and be clean, and afterward you may come into the camp."'"

The Hebrew word for "purify" is "chata." Most of the time, this word is translated as "sin." The Authorized Version translates it 167 times as "sin."

Interestingly, this word can also convey the opposite meaning; that is, to get rid of sin. In that context, it has been rendered in the Authorized Version as "purify," "cleanse," "purge," or "offer for sin." Used in that context, it literally means, "de-sin," or "purify from sin or error."

What was the sin that the Israelites - the men of war who had gone to battle - had to get rid of? Some say, it was strictly the transgression of the ritual law to not touch a dead person. They refer in this context to Numbers 19:11-12, 16.

It is correct that the entire 19th chapter of the book of Numbers describes the rite of purification of a person who had touched a dead body. In order to be able to enter the tabernacle (verse 13), he had to be sprinkled, on the third and on the seventh day, with the water of purification (the Authorized Version calls it "the water of separation"). This water is identified in verse 9 as a means to obtain purification from sin. Why was it necessary to be sprinkled and purified in that way, after one had touched a dead person?

The answer is that God wanted the Israelites to understand the great distinction between life and death. God is a God of the living, not of the dead. Death is always associated with sin. Death is the penalty for sin. Without sin, there would be no death. Once sin is removed, there will be no more death. There is also involved a symbolic meaning: We need to be spiritually alive, rather than spiritually dead.

We should also notice that the Hebrew word "chata," when applied to purification, can describe spiritual purification as well, not only ritual purification. For instance, David said in Psalm 51:7: "Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean." The Hebrew word for "purge" is "chata." David was asking God to remove all spiritual sin from him, to "de-sin" him, to "purify him from sin."

Now notice! The fact that the Israelites had to purify themselves after they had touched a dead person does NOT explain why the Israelites had to purify themselves from sin when they killed a living person.

Numbers 31:19 makes a distinction between an Israelite who had touched a dead person, and an Israelite who had killed a living person. The command that the Israelite had to be purified from sin because he had killed a person was a new command - it was not contained in Numbers 19. Why did God give it?

Here is why: Although God had commanded the Israelites to wage a particular war - to fight a particular battle - they had to purify themselves from sin, after they had done so. To kill a human being in war was, and still is, against the sixth of God's Ten Commandments. It is SIN in God's eyes. Man decided for himself to fight and kill in war, and God saw to it that the wars would end in the way that He wanted for His purpose. But to fight in war was NEVER JUSTIFIED in God's eyes. It has always been SIN to do so.

In the German translations, the word for "purify" is much better expressed. They use the word, "entsündigen " - which literally means, "to get rid of sin." They had sinned by killing humans in war - they had to get rid of that sin by purification.

The Rape of Dinah

Let us consider still another episode showing that killing in war is sin. When Dinah, the sister of Simeon and Levi, was violated by the son (Shechem) of the ruler of Sichem (Hamor), her brothers resorted to violence. We read in Genesis 34:25-26: "Now it came to pass on the third day ... that two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah's brothers, each took his sword and came boldly upon the city and killed all the males. And they killed Hamor and Shechem his son with the edge of the sword, and took Dinah from Shechem's house, and went out."

Simeon and Levi's action might appear justified to some. After all, we read, pertaining to Dinah's violation through Shechem, in verses 7 and 31: "And the sons of Jacob came in from the field when they heard it; and the men were grieved and very angry, because he had done a disgraceful thing in Israel by lying with Jacob's daughter, a thing which ought not to be done ... But they [Simeon and Levi] said, `Should he treat our sister like a harlot?'"

But notice Jacob's condemning judgment of his sons Simeon and Levi, and realize that Jacob spoke under God's inspiration: "Simeon and Levi are brothers; Instruments of cruelty [margin: violence] are in their dwelling place. Let not my soul enter their council; Let not my honor be united to their assembly; For in their anger they slew a man, And in their self-will they hamstrung an ox. Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce; And their wrath, for it is cruel! I will divide them in Jacob And scatter them in Israel" (Genesis 49:5-7).

Simeon and Levi's avenging war was, in the eyes of both Jacob and God, nothing less than murder. Every war fought by human beings is sin and constitutes murder in the eyes of God. Is it sin and murder in your eyes, too?

The Futility of War

Over the centuries, some have recognized the utter destructiveness and futility of war, and have openly admitted that war only results in more war.

U.S. Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman (1820-1891) said about war: "War is at best barbarism ... It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell."

 
British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain pointed out: "In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers."

The way of war is fundamentally opposite to the way of peace. The reason why we still have wars today is because people like war too much. The carnal mind does not acknowledge the law of God, nor can it be "subject to" it (Romans 8:7).

Winston Churchill wrote the following about the Confederacy's two chief generals, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson: "Both these men, though they habitually spoke and no doubt convinced themselves to the contrary, LOVED WAR as a technical art to which their lives had been given. Their sayings and letters abound with expressions of sorrow at the terrible decrees of which they had now become the servants. But on a long night march to a desperate battle at dawn Jackson muttered to his companion, `Delicious excitement,' and Lee ... observed, `It is well that war is so horrible - we could grow too fond of it.'"

God Protects Those Who Trust In Him

In addition to his booklet, "Military Service and War," which we quoted earlier, Herbert W. Armstrong published two articles in the September and October 1984 issues of the Plain Truth magazine, entitled, "The Sure Way to End the Fear of Nuclear War - NOW," and, "How the West Can End the Fear of Nuclear War - NOW."

In these articles, he said the following (emphasis in the original): "Nations Never NEEDED Go to War. Yielding to HUMAN NATURE is the CAUSE of war. Rebellion against God's law of peace is the CAUSE of war ... In respect to WAR, the basic point is the Sixth Commandment. It says, simply, `Thou shalt not kill.' If all nations obeyed that commandment and followed the way of LOVE toward other humans, there would be no war. But, one argues, that's a pretty platitude - but it's not practical - it won't work. WHY? Because, he argues, if your nation obeys that commandment and is disarmed with no military force, it would be attacked and beaten by some other nation [we might add here, or by terrorists] that disobeyed God's law, and believed in WAR [or terrorist attacks]. Your nation would therefore be helpless.

"Oh, but it WOULDN'T. The Creator understands human nature better than we humans do. HE PROVIDED FOR THAT! ... You think
 
the Almighty Creator-God is impractical - that he leaves those who OBEY him, who accept his GOVERNMENT over them, HELPLESS? ... You think - do you? - that the GOVERNMENT OF GOD is so feeble and lacking in power that it is unable to protect the individual or the nation it governs? ...

"Notice now, in your Bible, the specific application of the commandment, `Thou shalt not kill,' to military force and war. Notice how GOD says to those under HIS GOVERNMENT, that his GOVERNMENT ... will PROTECT his people against any invading force. God said to Israel: `But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries ... and I will cut them off' (Ex. 23:22-23). God promised supernaturally to fight any invading enemy [nation or terrorists] to protect the nation and people under HIS government ...

"A part of God's PLATFORM OF GOVERNMENT that he laid before the people [of Israel] before they became HIS NATION was the promise that HIS GOVERNMENT would protect its citizens from need of going to WAR. That is the OPEN PROMISE OF GOD, which would later apply to ANY nation ... " ("The Sure Way to End the Fear of Nuclear War NOW," The Plain Truth, September 1984, pp. 9-13).

Notice the following excerpts from Herbert W. Armstrong's article, "How the West Can End the Fear of Nuclear War NOW!", The Plain Truth, October 1984, pp. 20, 30: "War is so needless! War is WRONG! Yes, the West could put an END to the threat of nuclear war [or terrorist attacks] IMMEDIATELY - IF not only leaders, but ALSO the PEOPLE AS A WHOLE, could recognize REALITY - could understand that God is REAL - and would humble themselves before him, BELIEVE HIM - RELY ON him! But, if our people WILL NOT, then it is decreed we shall, in fewer years than you will believe, see OUR CITIES DESTROYED, along with a full third of our populations by a foreign invasion."

Did God Order His People to Sin?

Some might still say: But God ordered them to go to war, and God would never order anyone to sin. This argument and objection seems persuasive only at first sight, but certainly fails once we understand the truth on the subject.

As we explain in our booklet, "Angels, Demons and the Spirit World,"
 
beginning on page 46, God even uses sinning demons, at times, to carry out His Will. God did not order the demons to sin; rather, the demons decided to sin. God used or "ordered" them to do what they wanted to do, but only what conforms with His plan and purpose. For instance, Jesus told the demons to "Go and possess the pigs" (compare Matthew 8:32). One might say, He gave them an order, but it is clear that the demons wanted to do that - in fact, they asked Christ whether they could possess the pigs (compare Mark 5:12-13; Luke 8:30-32).

In another example, God told Satan that he could plague Job, but only after Satan asked permission to do it (compare the first two chapters of the book of Job). God told the spirit in heaven who wanted to become a lying spirit, to go out and deceive the king (compare 1 Kings 22). It was first the demon's decision. God then used him to accomplish His Will.

The same is true for Israel's wars. In reading the accounts carefully, we find that many times, Israel asked God, "Shall we fight this battle?" And God's answer was often times, "Yes." Sometimes, though, He said, "No," as to fight that particular battle was not within the parameters of God's plan and purpose. We must firmly keep the truth of the matter in mind, that it was Israel who WANTED to fight, generally speaking, otherwise, why would they have even ASKED God to fight in the first place?

It was MAN's decision to fight, just as it was the demon's decision, for example, to deceive people. God ALLOWED and PERMITTED such conduct FOR A REASON.

Some may say that Israel was guiltless because God ordered them to fight, even killing women and children. But was the spirit guiltless who became a lying spirit in the mouth of all the false prophets? Was Judas guiltless when he betrayed Christ, under the influence and possession of Satan, although it was determined from the outset that it would be he who would betray his Master (compare John 6:64; Matthew 26:24-25)?

This does not mean, by any stretch of the imagination, that there is any wrong with God and that God acted wrongly when He commanded the Israelites to fight in war. It was Israel who sinned, not God. It is true that, at God's command, the Israelites "utterly destroyed the men, women, and little ones of every city" (Deuteronomy 2:34).

Passages like these have led many readers to conclude that the God of the Old Testament was harsh and cruel, while Jesus Christ was gentle
 
and meek. The fact is, however, that it was Jesus Christ - the second member in the God Family - Who appeared to Moses and gave this command (compare 1 Corinthians 10:4). It was He - the Giver of life - Who created mankind (compare Hebrews 1:1-2; John 1:3; Colossians 1:16; Ephesians 3:9), and Who rightly determined to take the lives of certain people. Christ, in His wisdom, ended the suffering of those people who lived in that evil, demon-worshipping society, knowing that God would later resurrect them to physical life in a better world - a world in which His right way of life would be taught to everyone and enforced throughout the earth (compare Revelation 20:11-12. For further information on man's future resurrection, please read our free booklets, "Do You Have An Immortal Soul?" and "God's Commanded Holy Days").

Since carnal and unconverted Israel did not trust in God's might and strength to lead them and protect them, they decided - against God's Will - to take care of matters themselves. Rather than leaving the fighting to God (compare Exodus 14:14), they CHOSE to become a warring nation. Still, God used them as His instruments to carry out His Will to bring them into the Promised Land, as He had unconditionally promised Abraham.

We find, in Deuteronmoy 20, certain laws regarding the principles governing warfare. Remember, God NEVER intended Israel to fight in war, but after Israel decided to be a warfaring nation, God gave them certain principles to go by. Those principles differ fundamentally from the cruel and merciless way in which wars are being fought today in this world.

Of course, the prerogative to take human life belongs solely to God. Only He has the right to kill a person or command someone else to do it. Angels don't sin when they kill men, in compliance with God's Will, as angels are higher than men (Likewise, humans don't sin, when they kill animals for food, as they are higher than animals). Angels would sin, however, if they were to kill humans against God's Will (as humans sin, when they kill animals against God's Will - for example, by slaughtering them just for "fun," without any need for food or other permissible purposes). And this is why we, once we are glorified members of the God Family, will not sin either, when we take human life in the future. In fact, as God beings, it will be impossible for us to sin, as we will always live in perfect harmony with the Will of God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ. But as long as we are humans, we are not guiltless if we

fight in war and kill other humans. To do so would be, and is, sin.

Some have wrongly concluded that it must be pleasing to God when we fight in war, but they do not understand what happened in Old Testament times, and why. For instance, James Fenimore Cooper quoted a soldier in his historical novel, "The Spy," saying that since God had ancient Israel fight in war, He could not be against Christian soldiers fighting.

No Christian Soldiers!

As we pointed out earlier, originally there were no Christian soldiers. But as paganism crept into the Roman Catholic Church, militaristic ideas began to be embraced by Church leaders as well. And so we find in historical records that even members of the true Church of God were at times - over the centuries - not immune from participating in war. Are we today? Or, are we going to fall into the same trap when the time of temptation comes? Unless we KNOW, and we KNOW that we KNOW that it is a SIN for man to fight in war, we MIGHT be in danger of making the wrong decision when every nation will be engulfed in an all-encompassing future World War, soon to come.

Let us review, at this point, the historical record in more detail.

The Paulicians are first mentioned in historical records in 555 A.D. Traditionally, they have been considered to be a part of the spiritual body of Christ. The word "Paulician" is a derogatory term that means,
 
"followers of wretched little Paul." They preached strongly against any participation in war. But when, around 800 A.D., the Catholic Church began to persecute them, some of them began to defend themselves with weapons. Their great leader Sergius, who taught them from 801 to 835, condemned fighting and retaliation. But after his death, even those who had listened to him, began to fight. Now the Paulicians became known as a warrior people.

At one time, the Waldenses were apparently part of the body of Christ. Their founder, Peter Waldo, started to teach in 1161. He taught, among other things, that taking a life was wrong. But after his death, and that of early subsequent leaders, many of the Waldenses took up arms in 1380 when the Inquisitors invaded their areas. And in 1619, their leader, Simon Pechi, went to war in Austria, although he still taught and kept the Sabbath. His right understanding regarding the Sabbath did not prevent him from having ACQUIRED a wrong understanding pertaining to killing and war!

When we review the records of the early Sabbath-keeping Church of God in America, we find that although the Church officially condemned warfare, some Sabbath-keeping members began, as early as 1776, to participate in war.

There are indications in the Bible that members of the true Church of God, who once professed to believe it was wrong to participate in war, will soon take up arms and fight in war, because they have never fully convinced themselves that it is wrong to do so. If, and when they do think to get involved, they would do well to remember Christ's stern warning to Peter: " ... all who take the sword, will perish by the sword" (compare Matthew 26:52). They should also remember what God says, in effect: "My soul hates those who delight in war" (compare Psalm 5:6; 68:30). And they should recall that, "Every warrior's sandal from the noisy battle, And garments rolled in blood, Will be used for burning and fuel of fire" (Isaiah 9:5).

At times of temptation we can keep ourselves on track in our relationship with God by recalling the Scriptures God has provided for us, rightly applying them in any given situation. Understanding God's viewpoint on fighting and war, is one example of "rightly dividing the word of truth" (compare 2 Timothy 2:15).

Several Church organizations, describing themselves as part of the "Church of God," as well as certain "Christian" writers, claiming to belong to the true Church of God, have already officially adopted the position that it would not be a sin for a Christian to fight in war. There are others, who, although preaching against the participation of a Christian in today's wars, still do not want to give up their wrong ideas as to why Israel and David fought in Old Testament times.

Let us quote from another article that Mr. Armstrong wrote on the subject of war. It was published in the Plain Truth magazine of February of 1986, one month following his death on January 16, 1986. The article is entitled, "Why Does God Allow Wars?"

"God's law or way is love. Love is always away from self - not toward self. Never lust or anything of that sort. The opposite way is lust and greed, that's all toward self - vanity! And it leads to the system in this world - competition and strife - yes, the getting way, the accumulating, the taking way. And that is the cause of wars. Why does God allow war and human suffering? We have competition. Everything is competition in this world. Everything is carried along on the selfish, the getting, basis - greed and vanity. To prevent the evils of competition and wars today God would have to cram his religion down our throats. Our way, the violation of the law of God, the law of love, is causing war, human anguish and human suffering. God had to allow it (to let us have our own way) in order to fulfill his purpose of creating holy character.

"The only way that God could stop war would be to stop the cause. He would have, in effect, to cram his religion down our throats - down the throats of all humanity. There wouldn't be any free moral agency; there wouldn't be any [development of Godly] character and God's purpose could never be fulfilled. That's why God allows wars, and that's why God allows suffering."

Killing in War Breaks the Ten Commandments

God does not change. His character does not change. God gave man the Ten Commandments and He won't change them. They will stay in force and effect as long as there are human beings living in the flesh. The Ten Commandments reflect God's character; that is, how He would live if He were a man. And when God became a man in the person of Jesus Christ, that is how God DID live in the flesh. For instance, Christ kept the Sabbath, which was made FOR MAN (compare Mark 2:27).

Christ did not go to war. He did not enter the military. He rebuked Peter for picking up the sword to defend Him against an illegal arrest. When Christ was reviled, He did not revile in return; when He suffered, He threatened not, but committed Himself to God who judges righteously (compare 1 Peter 2:23). Is this our approach to life? Is this how we think and act in the face of adversity?

Since God's character has not changed, we know that He felt exactly the same regarding ancient Israel and war. It is sin for a human being to fight in war today, just as it was sin in Old Testament times. It has ALWAYS been a violation of God's spiritual law, the Ten Commandments.

Some disagree, claiming that God never prohibited killing in war. They say that the Ten Commandments only prohibit "murder" ("ratsach" in Hebrew), and "killing in war" is allegedly not "murder."

We have already discussed the fact that Christ and James equated killing in war with murder. They taught that killing in war is in violation of the Ten Commandments.

The Avenger of Blood

A brief discussion here of the provisions regarding the avenger of blood might also be helpful in showing the error in reasoning that killing in war is not murder.

A perpetrator who "accidentally" brought about the death of another person (Numbers 35:15), without hating the victim, was allowed to flee to a city of refuge to escape the wrath of the avenger of blood. He was only allowed to escape death if he acted "unintentionally" or "ignorantly" (Deuteronomy 19:4). For instance, he might have killed a person by throwing a stone at him, not realizing that the victim was there (Numbers 35:23). Or, he might have killed the victim without wanting to (Deuteronomy 19:5; Numbers 35:22). If, on the other hand, the perpetrator hated the victim in the past, or if he struck him intentionally with a stone, an iron implement or a wooden hand weapon, even though he might not have hated the victim, he was still to be executed (Deuteronomy 19:4, 6, 11; Numbers 35:20-21; 16-18).

Some misunderstand certain statements in the book of Numbers to say that only the person who acted intentionally, knowingly and/or with hatred is called a "murderer" ("ratsach" in Hebrew; compare Numbers 35:16: "But if he strikes [Hebrew, "nakah"] him with an iron implement, so that he dies, he is a murderer [Hebrew, "ratsach"]; the murderer [Hebrew, "ratsach"] shall surely be out to death."). This understanding is technically incorrect, as sometimes the perpetrator accidentally or unintentionally causing the death of a person is also called a "murderer" as well (compare Numbers 35:25; Deuteronomy 4:42; 19:4 - in all these cases, the Hebrew word for "manslayer" is "ratsach," i.e. "murderer."). In addition, Numbers 35:30 equates the Hebrew words for "killing" [nakah] and "murder" [ratsach]. We read: "Whoever kills a person, the murderer shall be put to death ... " In most cases, however, the underlying Hebrew word for "manslayer" is "nakah" - one who smites another.

The meaning of the passage in Numbers 35:15-16 [referred to above] is that a person who kills intentionally, knowingly and/or with hatred is a murderer worthy of death, whereas others are, although still called "murderers" at times, not worthy of death. Note that even the avenger of blood who was permitted - but not required - to kill a murderer worthy of death, is still sometimes called a "murderer" himself, compare Numbers 35:27: " ... and the avenger of blood finds himself outside the limits of his city of refuge, and the avenger of blood kills [in Hebrew, "ratsach," i.e. "murders"] the manslayer [in Hebrew, "ratsach," i.e. "murderer"], he shall not be guilty of blood ... "

The Scriptures tell us that the killing or "smiting" of another human being is wrong in God's eyes and in violation of the Ten Commandments. The "accidental" manslayer, who did not hate his neighbor whom he killed, was not considered innocent, as his conduct, albeit unintentional or unknowing, led to the death of a person. With proper precautions, such a death could have been avoided. The accidental manslayer still had to flee to a city of refuge and stay there until the high priest died. If he left the city before the death of the high priest, the avenger of blood was permitted, although not required, to kill him.

We might also ask, in this context, how "accidental deaths" of innocent war victims, commonly called "casualties of war," can be explained in light of these Scriptures.

Killing in War Not Murder?

Some point out that sometimes, the Hebrew word for "killing" in the context of war is "harag," and since this is a different word than the one used in the Ten Commandments ("ratsach"), killing in war is allegedly not murder and therefore permitted. For instance, we read in Numbers 31:7: "And they WARRED against the Midianites, just as the LORD commanded Moses, and they killed [Hebrew, "hagar"] all the males."

This argument is only convincing at first sight, because the Hebrew word "hagar" is also used to describe "murder." Compare Psalm 10:8: "[The wicked] ... sits in the lurking places of the villages; In the secret places he murders [Hebrew, "hagar"] the innocent ... " Compare, too, Jeremiah 4:31 and Hosea 9:13. The Hebrew word for " murderer" in both cases is "hagar."

Please note, too, that Cain murdered his brother Abel, as it is clearly explained in 1 John 3:12: " ... Cain who was of the wicked one ... murdered his brother ... " But notice, too, that Genesis 4:8 tells us: "Now Cain talked with Abel his brother, and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother and killed [Hebrew, "hagar"] him." The Hebrew word "hagar" in this passage clearly describes "murder." The concept, then, that the Hebrew word "hagar" does not describe murder is clearly erroneous. It cannot be used for the argument that killing in war is not murder, and that it is not a violation of the Ten Commandments.

Another argument is that killing is only "murder," according to the Bible, when it is done with hate. To support this argument, some quote Christ's words in Matthew 5:21-22, claiming that murder begins with a hateful heart. Also, they point out that 1 John 3:15 defines a person as a murderer, who "hates his brother." It is certainly true that hate can lead to murder. This fact does not help those, however, who allege that killing in war is not murder, as soldiers are trained to HATE their enemies, so THAT they can kill them. In addition, as has been explained in our discussion regarding the "avenger of blood," killing out of hate is not the only way in which one is labelled, Biblically, as a murderer.

With that same rationale, someone would not be guilty of adultery, as long as he or she does not lust after another person (compare Matthew 5:27-28). Adultery can begin, and many times does, with looking at another person to lust for him or her, but this is not the only way in which one can commit adultery. Although Abraham may or may not have lusted after his wife's maid, when producing offspring through her (compare Genesis 16:1-4), this was clearly a case of adultery, and it had terrible consequences for all of the parties involved.

"Feed Your Enemies" in Practical Application

We find a very powerful example of the application of Christ's words, to bless and help our enemies, in the sixth chapter of 2 Kings. We read, beginning in verse 14, that the king of Syria "sent horses and chariots and a great army" to the city of Dothan, to capture the prophet Elisha.

The king's army "came by night and surrounded the city. And when the servant [Gehazi] of the man of God [Elisha] arose early and went out, there was an army, surrounding the city with horses and chariots ... And Elisha prayed, and said, `LORD, I pray, open his eyes that he may see.' Then the LORD opened the eyes of the young man, and he saw. And behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha [Christ's servants - legions of angels]. So when the Syrians came down to him, Elisha prayed to the LORD, and said, `Strike this people, I pray, with blindness.' And He struck them with blindness according to the word of Elisha. Now Elisha said to them, `This is not the way, nor is this the city. Follow me, and I will bring you to the man whom you seek.' But he led them to Samaria. So it was, when they had come to Samaria, that Elisha said, `LORD, open the eyes of these men, that they may see.' And the LORD opened their eyes, and they saw; and there they were, inside Samaria! Now when the king of Israel saw them, he said to Elisha, `My father, shall I kill them? Shall I kill them?' But he answered, `You shall not kill them. Would you kill those whom you have taken captive with your sword and your bow? Set food and water before them, that they may eat and drink and go to their master.' Then he prepared a great feast for them; and after they ate and drank, he sent them away and they went to their master. So the bands of Syrian raiders came no more into the land of Israel" (2 Kings 6:14-23).

This can be the result, if we obey God and bless those who curse us - if we feed our enemy when he is hungry and give him to drink when he is thirsty, rather than killing him in war. Is this too simplistic, too impractical? Here we see that it is not: When the king of Israel applied Christ's words to bless his enemies, they did not again try to raid his country.

The Bible is clear that every war fought by human beings is sin. It is murder in the eyes of God. Is it sin and murder in your eyes, too?

Conscientious Objection

Today, most of us are not being called to fight in war. There is presently no draft in the United States of America, Canada or Great Britain, although the question of instituting a draft in the USA is being discussed. In some European and other countries, there is a draft. In any event, members, or prospective members of the Church of God must know the Biblical truth on the matter of military service. A true Christian will not join the military, as he or she is conscientiously opposed to so doing. But in order to be a conscientious objector, one's conscience must OBJECT to joining the military and fighting and killing in war. In case of a draft and an examination, those who claim to be conscientious objectors must be able to convince the examiners that they are in fact convicted that they cannot participate in war.

A vague answer, such as, "it is probably wrong," is not going to convince anyone. Neither will an answer like, "It was Godly to fight in Old Testament times, but it is not Godly now, because we are living today under a different administration." Such an answer will surely prompt further questions, such as, "Do you believe that a soldier who is not a Christian SINS when he goes to war, since he is not yet under the new administration?" If that question is answered with, "No," the applicant is, in all likelihood, not going to be exempted from military service.

Most countries will not recognize someone as a conscientious objector if his conscience only bothers him in regard to fighting in selective wars, while not being opposed to fighting in all wars. For instance, an American would not be recognized as a conscientious objector if he is opposed to fighting in Iraq, while he would have been willing to fight in World War II.

The Biblically correct answer to all of these questions is that ALL wars fought by humans, are, and always have been, a sin! This applies to all wars fought in Old Testament times, and it applies to all wars that have been fought since the beginning of the New Testament and on into our own recent history. To properly understand the events that

took place in Old Testament times, one has to read them with "New Testament" eyes. It is foolish and wrong to attempt to read "New Testament" Scriptures with "Old Testament" eyes.

When someone is being interrogated about his beliefs pertaining to military service and war, the examiners will also look at what the person does, how he lives, how he acts and reacts in his personal life. They want to know that what the applicant says is backed up by what he does. Do your actions back up your beliefs?

How Do We Protect Ourselves?

The question boils down to this: What do we do for our own protection since it is a sin to fight, and even to have a vengeful spirit? Do we believe in God and rely on Him for our protection, having the faith that it is GOD who is our protecting shield, or do we think that we must have additional security in the form of a handgun or some sort of firearm?

Do we think that God is incapable of helping us in certain circumstances?

We should, of course, do everything that we can do to avoid getting into dangerous situations. We obviously should not go to places where gangs assemble, and we should not get involved with people who are known to be active in crimes, for instance.

In addition, Proverbs 15:1 tells us that a soft answer turns away wrath but that grievous words stir up strife. So then, we need to be peacemakers, and we need to avoid everything that would create strife. Proverbs 18:6 reminds us that a fool's lips enter into contention and that his mouth calls for violent reactions.

We are also told in Proverbs 26:17 that he who passes by and meddles with strife belonging not to him, is like one who takes a dog by the ears. The point is, the battles of this world, which are fought by this world, are not our battles! This Scripture tells us not to be a fool, meddling with strife not belonging to us! We are to be ambassadors for Christ (compare 2 Corinthians 5:20). We are citizens of another kingdom. Our citizenship is in heaven. Our kingdom is not of this world. That is one of the reasons why we don't vote for leaders in this world (see accompanying Boxes). That is one of the reasons why we don't fight in the wars of this world. Do you see how the Scriptures teach us right living?

The most important of all the things you can do to avoid using violence is to pray to God, on a daily basis: "Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil" (compare Matthew 6:13). We are to plead with God daily to NOT ALLOW a tempting situation that might be too difficult for us to bear, to overtake us.

However, we read in the Bible that righteous persons have sometimes found themselves being attacked by others. What did they do, and what should YOU do, if God allows it?

First, realize that God would NOT allow it if you were not able to bear it, as 1 Corinthians 10:13 tells us. And when God does allow it, He will also provide a way of escape for you. This is sometimes literally the case. Sometimes you need to actually flee, to run away! Christ did so on occasion. We read in John 10:39: "Therefore they sought again to seize Him, but He escaped out of their hand."

What Not to Do!

When we find ourselves, or others, in a dangerous, challenging, life-threatening situation, we must PRAY to God, with faith, to HELP us out of that situation. To fight our fight for us! To give us the wisdom and the power NOT to do the WRONG thing, however tempting it may be.

We must realize that no matter what harm we may WANT to do
 
physically in a given situation, we must not seriously injure or kill the attacker. But unless we understand beforehand, and have in our mind that we are not to do something with the intent to seriously injure or kill the attacker, we might very well do so when the occasion presents itself. If we carry a gun with us or have one handy, say, next to our bed, we will certainly try to use it, but then may be killed in the process.

People who disagree with the foregoing may ask you what you would do if you came home and a robber was in the process of raping your wife or killing your husband. These kinds of questions are reminiscent of questions asked by those who are in favor of abortion. They never address the fact that abortion is clearly wrong when used as a means of birth control. They always use the dramatic exceptions, like that of a young girl who is raped. But even in such a tragic case, the answer is clear: Abortion is always wrong! Since that is the Biblical teaching, abortion is not an option, even in such a tragic situation of rape. But there are solutions. Adoption might be one of them. A young girl in such a situation would need a lot of guidance through spiritual and emotional counseling, as well as physical assistance. But we do not help the girl or the unborn child, by saying, "Well, okay then, let her have an abortion."

The same is true for an attacker threatening a loved one. Realistically, how many times does this happen? But if it does happen, do you really think that you can take a gun and shoot the attacker, and that the attacker would let you do it without any resistance? Chances are, he will use his gun first. In any case, to use a gun and shoot the attacker would be against the clear Biblical teaching of prohibiting killing. But what about just trying to injure him? In the heat of the moment, you may not be able to do just that, even if you wanted to. And if the attacker would only be injured, he would still have the chance to kill you or others who are with you.

Christ told Peter, when he pulled his sword in defense of Christ and just injured the servant, to put his sword away. Christ's protection did not depend on human weapons. It depended on God the Father and His angels. So, too, with us. Our real protection comes from the same source.

Some claim that Christ resorted to violence when He overturned the tables of the money changers. In fact, He did so twice - at the
 
beginning of His public ministry and also near the end of His life here on earth. The events are described in John 2:14-17 and in Matthew 21:12-13; Mark 11:15-18; and Luke 19:45-46. A careful study reveals that Christ - the legitimate owner of the Temple - overturned the tables of the money changers who occupied the Temple for inappropriate purposes that were not sanctioned by the owner. We don't read that Christ injured the money changers - or even, that He drove them out. He used whips to drive out their sheep and oxen - but He did not use the whips to beat the people. The New International Version translates John 2:15, as follows: "So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables."

Where Our Trust Is ...

The whole issue really comes down to where we place our trust and confidence for our protection, in EVERY situation.

Notice God's promise to His people, in Exodus 34:22-24: "And you shall observe the Feast of Weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the Feast of Ingathering at the year's end. Three times in the year all your men shall appear before the Lord, the LORD God of Israel. For I will cast out the nations before you and enlarge your borders; neither will any man covet your land when you go up to appear before the LORD your God three times in the year."

When man places his trust and confidence in God, God will protect man. Ultimately though, no matter the consequences, we must be living a life pleasing to God. We must never fear the ones who can take our physical life from us, but we must fear, or deeply respect, the One who can refuse to give us ETERNAL LIFE.

We must always have the attitude that Daniel's three friends had when they were asked to violate God's laws by worshipping an idol, and in case of refusal, were threatened with being thrown into a fiery furnace. We need to speak and act in the same way when we are being tempted to worship Satan - the god of war - by picking up a gun or a knife or another weapon to injure or even kill another person. We read their answer in Daniel 3:17-18: " ... our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and He will deliver us from your hand, O king. But if not, let it be known to you, O king, that we do
 
not serve your gods, nor will we worship the gold image which you have set up."

We must not serve the wisdom of this world, worshipping the power of the air and the god of destruction and war. Rather, we must always follow the PRINCE OF PEACE.

Remember what the angels told the shepherds when Christ was born: "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men on whom His favor rests (Luke 2, 14, NIV), or, as the NRSV renders it, " ... with whom He is pleased." (Compare accompanying box.)

When God is pleased with us, when His favor rests on us, THEN He will be our shield and protection in times of impending battles. We must trust in God (compare Psalm 56:3-4, 8-11), AND we must be willing to obey His commandments, no matter what the situation, circumstance or consequence. God tells us: "You shall not kill!" Are you listening to Him?

The following booklets are available, upon request:

Europe in Prophecy: The Unfolding of End-Time Events

The Theory of Evolution - a Fairy Tale for Adults?

The Gospel of the Kingdom of God

Don't Keep Christmas

Is God a Trinity?

Do We Have an Immortal Soul?

The Keys to Happy Marriages and Families

And Lawlessness Will Abound...

The Great Tribulation and the Day of the Lord

God's Commanded Holy Days

God Is a Family

Baptism - a Requirement for Salvation?

Angels, Demons and the Spirit World

Are You Already Born Again?

Sickness and Healing - What the Bible Tells Us

Jesus Christ - A Great Mystery!

Tithing - Today?

United States
Church of the Eternal God
PO Box 270519
San Diego, CA 92198
www.eternalgod.org

Canada
Church of God, ACF
Box 1480
Summerland B.C. V0H 1Z0
www.churchofgodacf.ca

United Kingdom
Global Church of God
PO Box 2111
Derby DE1 1ZR
www.globalchurchofgod.co.uk